Nov. 29, 2012 (#1224)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Nov. 29, 2012:
Neuroscience Freezin' Ability to Reason:
"The World is Made Safe for Corporate
Although Even Young Children See Through Hypocrisy
Until They're Taught Group Consensus in School
Which Enables Doublethink, a Political Tool,
Which Stops Logic Like Auto-Lube Tainted with Salt,
Setting the Mind, Pavlovian-Style, Back to Default,
State-Approved Thinking Causes Cerebral Ischemia,
Strangling Restrictions Re-enforced by Academia,
Turns the Logical Mind into a System of Tunnels
Through Which Your Updates by Masters Funnels
Political Correctness, Where Bad Becomes Good,
Delete All Oldthink or Stay Sane - You Could"
© Alan Watt Nov. 29, 2012
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Nov. 29, 2012 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 29th of November, 2012. I always tell newcomers to make good use of the website cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the beginning of the broadcast rather than plug myself all the way through it. That way you can help me out if you want to, and if not you can tune in elsewhere. What I do is go into the system you’re living in, how it got to be this system that you’re living in, the one they don’t tell you about, at the top, because they really truly believe that it’s so awesome and over your head that you’d never understand it anyway. In other words, they don’t want you objecting to all the big plans that are underway right now. And this system of course, has been here before you were born. It’s supra-national. It was set up a long time ago by those who decided to take over the world, all of its resources, and alter all the people on the earth, including population reduction. They want to improve the stock, basically, of slaves at the bottom; and it’s all done through science and academia. The biggest boys at the top that set it up of course, control the money of the whole planet, and all the big corporations as well.
So you can go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com website, make good use of it. There’s over a thousand free audios for download. There’s also transcripts in English on all the sites you’ll see listed there, and you’ll see transcripts, for print-up, in other languages if you go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu. If you want to support me too, you can do so by buying the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com and donating, because really, it’s pretty, pretty tight these days. [Order and donation options listed above.] Remember, straight donations are really, seriously welcome.
As I say, you’re born into this system. Your parents don’t know it was on the go a long time ago, and your grandparents too. As I say, these boys at the top have brought about world wars in order to change the sides of all the competitive nations, and conflicting nations; that’s the dialectic of course. Many of their propagandists talked about this, about the year 1900, and even before in fact. They did bring about their world wars, because wars, as Carroll Quigley said, and others have said, change the cultures of societies on all conflicting sides, massive cultural changes. In fact, Quigley said, you can get more done in five years of war, because you’re under martial law type scenarios, than you can do in 50 years of peace. Hence, 9/11 was the kickoff for the 21st century really, and under this guise of anti-terrorism the whole world has been turned upside down, on queue, all at the same time, because of one major event. So it was all planned long, long in advance.
This parallel government, that has been talked about by Margaret Thatcher and other people, once they get out of government, she says, we all know each other, we belong to the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations, we all know the other leaders of the world, we get things done, behind the scenes, we’re not responsible to the public for the decisions and the things we make happen. So you’re living through a fast transition. This is the age of transition, this century of transition. And by the transition it means that all their old objectives that they talked about from the 1700s onwards – that’s more openly and publicly, and published in fact – they’re bringing into being. It’s a eugenical type society. Everyone literally has a function to serve in this big society. If you don’t have a function you simply will be euthanized, at birth. Interesting to see that Britain is actually bringing that in now, if a child is sick now, they’re already killing the elderly, and they are starting with the young now too, apart from all the abortions. So you’re living in a system that is scientifically designed and controlled. You are international. They use the nation-state only for voting time, so as you’ll vote for them and keep the farce going. All the politicians do is to rubberstamp the big handouts to international corporations, using your tax money, and to bail out banks of course, that run the whole show. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt. Many times I’ve talked before about the educational system, because big philosophers of the past, really deep thinkers who pondered things, and weighty problems of course, have gone on about brainwashing. Brainwashing is nothing new by the State. And I’m not talking about just MK Ultra and these kind of things, the advanced type; it’s even more advanced now of course. But really, for rulership’s purposes, they always have to brainwash the peasantry.
In the Middle Ages it was quite simple. The peasant knew all he was told, which wasn’t much at all, except the Lord over him, the warlord that was appointed over him to take over his lands, he now owned the lands and you worked for him basically. You were a tenant farmer, you owned nothing, and you had to supply him with enough stock and enough crops every year for him to make money and sell. Then of course they had their basic religion which kept the order very stable, you see; everybody had their place in the religious system. And that’s all you had to know; that was it, very, very simple. Then of course in the age of education, and education had to be given to the basic plebeians, basically, because they had to man the factories and follow simple written instructions and things like that. Then they had to train a managerial class, where they had to give them education to an extent, and even then it was a minimalistic education. It still is today, even for all those who go to university; what you’re getting taught is low-level stuff – there’s three levels of all realities in this world.
You find that children, children, regardless of education, can tell what’s right or wrong. If someone strikes a pal of theirs, they’ll tell you that was wrong; they know who did it and they’ll say so. Because children are so open to seeing things in black and white, then governments know to grab them very, very early because they can then indoctrinate them with a style, where they’ll give them parts of a story, they can make them prejudiced against certain things, or they can make them very, very prideful of their nation or their country or whatever or religion, and it goes on from there. They can get warped. And of course, all totalitarian societies grab the children early and indoctrinate them, to worship the state basically. You see that in China, it’s a state worship, which is communism.
As I say, the children are very easy to see what’s right and wrong. But as they get older of course their education system can also alter their ways of seeing black and white. Then they get older still, into the workforce, they tend to be all me-centered; they get hedonistic. That was the technique that was brought in for this particular time. Because you’re living through a stage where your whole culture was designed by other people for you to copy and emulate and think it’s all quite normal. Most of them are actually dead now but we’re going through the culture they created a long time ago. This particular part was created 60-70 years ago. They knew then they’d have the destruction of the family unit, they’d have incredible promiscuity, massive abortion to bring down the populations, and a hedonistic society. Bertrand Russell said so in one of his books, and many other people too. Julian Huxley that worked at UNESCO, at the United Nations, said the same thing.
So anyway getting back to this point, as we grow older you can be trained to be fearful of saying something. And there’s many, many techniques to make you fearful of saying something. And people, it’s like being in a workplace where you see something wrong happening and you complain, and you turn around to the ones who have seen it too and you say, well are you with me, we’ll go and complain about it? You’ll see the eyes going down, because they’re all scared of losing their job and all the rest of it. They know what’s right and wrong, but nope, they’ll go along and let others suffer. That’s just what they do. That’s human nature unfortunately.
But we’ve all watched Palestine, our whole lives – it was on the go long before most of us were born – and people getting put off their land and settlers coming in from Israel, or Tel Aviv, and spreading outwards. And we’ve watched the whole world sit in silence each time, like the Gaza Strip is attacked and so on. It’s like fish in a barrel, getting bombed from the air, which is not called terrorism. But everybody’s embarrassed to say anything, and afraid to say anything too. Now, the Palestinians have been trying for years to get some kind of status at the United Nations, at least be recognized as a people. See, the big con all this time is to pretend that they’re not a people. I guess we’re just blowing up dummies, you see. Here’s an article here for instance and it says…
Palestinians' UN upgrade to nonmember observer state:
Struggles ahead over possible powers
foxnews.com / November 29, 2012 / Associated Press
UNITED NATIONS – Although Palestinians achieved their goal of being upgraded to nonmember observer state status at the United Nations on Wednesday, they still face a series of struggles to capitalize on that recognition throughout the U.N. system. (Alan: And this is from Fox news, that’s not exactly impartial.)
The Palestinian Authority, by a General Assembly vote of 138-9 with 41 abstentions, joined the Vatican Thursday as the only other entity with nonmember observer state status. In practice, the Palestinians gain few new powers.
Much of what unfolds will depend on how hard the Palestinians want to pursue membership in various U.N. agencies, and who will support them. (A: And that’s where the eyes all go down, oh dear, because they’re afraid of others, you see.) Here's a look at how the Palestinians' role could change at the U.N.: (A: Then it goes through a little list of things too, to see if they can get different kind of organizations within the United Nations to back them on certain things and so on.)
Last year, the Palestinians tried and failed to get full U.N. member-state status. The Security Council must approve new members, and the United States made clear it would veto any Palestinian attempt. (A: So a child, you understand a child would see that as being wrong, very clearly. Why would these people not be given the same rights, to exist, as a people, and be recognized as a people, as anybody else? It’s only when you get older you understand that there’s something bigger behind this, and folk are scared to talk about it. Of course they’re scared to talk about it. And why does the US jump in and say, ‘oh no, we don’t want that’? And Britain did the same; Canada did the same too. What do they all have in common? What are they afraid of at the top? Anyway it says…) So the doomed full membership bid was never brought forward for a full council vote.
— The International Court of Justice, often called the "World Court," (A: What a disgusting name, the Court of Justice, right…) accepts only disputes between fully recognized member-states of the U.N. (A: So if you don’t get recognized, well, as I say, you’re just a straw dummy I guess.) In the past, countries that were not yet U.N. members — Switzerland and Nauru — accepted the jurisdiction of the court. However, parties to any dispute must be willing to accept the court's judgment, and it is hard to imagine any case in which both Israel and the Palestinians would agree to be bound by the court's decision.
— The International Criminal Court at the Hague can review war crimes, and Israel has objected to the possibility of the Palestinians bringing cases to the ICC. But to do so, the Palestinians would have to file papers of "accession" under the Rome Treaty that set up the ICC. That membership option is open to "all states."
In practice, the application to become a "state" member of the ICC system would go to the office of the U.N. Secretary-General, which is the official repository for signatures. The U.N. chief's office would, in that case, have to turn to the U.N. legal department for an opinion on whether the Palestinians constitute a "state." (A: So they’ll debate about if these people are real, are they there or not, you know; since, you know, the Romans mentioned the Palestinians, but we’ll debate if they're actually a state or not, you see, this farce, you know. That means, if you’re not a state you can just slaughter them, like the Aborigines of Australia? They used to do that in the 1800s, just for sport, you know. And I’m not kidding about that. Anyway, we’ll see how this goes. As I say, it won’t go very far, but at least they’ve got some kind of, I guess they can go in and look, as an observer, at what happens at the United Nations.)
But a child would see the hypocrisy and the wrongness in all the things that have been happening. But the adults, the adults that think they’re sane and all that, can be awfully disgusting cowards at times and they’re scared to say anything at all.
And here’s another one too. I can remember when the Inuit in Canada were given their so-called area and their freedoms as, basically, a people in a province area, an area which they own. And I thought, in no time at all the big boys in Canada that set all this up would have them in massive debt and bankrupt them, which happened actually, so they’re basically in debt and all the rest of it. The Inuit are sitting on billions of barrels of oil. And I wonder who would know that? Would the Intuits know that? or would the guys who, you know, said you can have that land, down the road there? Would they know that?
The Alaskans sitting on billions of barrels of oil
By May Abdalla / bbc.co.uk / 29 November 2012
After a decade of legal wrangling and spending $4.5bn (£2.8bn), this year Shell Oil was given permission to begin exploratory drilling off the coast of Alaska. But many in the local Inupiat community are concerned it could have a devastating impact on one of their main sources of food - the bowhead whale.
(A: It shows you a woman here, they go into her house and all that, and she shows you what she’s got in the fridge.) Marie Casados shows me the contents on her freezer. Inside there's whale meat, muktuk - frozen whale skin and blubber - a selection of fish and a polar bear foot, which looks like a human hand. (A: See, it’s very hard to grow vegetables and stuff, even Monsanto’s stuff, up that way. And these folk have been living like this for thousands of years.) She describes it as a real delicacy. But it's more than that - this is her food supply for the winter.
Fishing and hunting are central to the Inupiat way of life - archaeologists have found evidence of humans hunting whales in the area dating back to as early as 800BC.
"We are the oldest continuous inhabitants of North America," says Point Hope's Mayor Steve Oomituk. "We've been here thousands of years." (A: Well, that counts for nothing these days; as I say, if you don’t get recognized, that’s that.)
Oomituk shares the fear of many in the small community - population 800 - that offshore drilling by Shell could destroy the food chain that they rely on for survival. Over 80% of the food eaten in Point Hope is caught by the people themselves.
How the Indians elsewhere in Canada have been done in, I’m not kidding about this too, because the British did this very early on in fact, if you go through Willie Brandt, and other ones, that was inducted into freemasonry. He was a chief, a powerful chief, and they inducted him into freemasonry. Then a lot of the money that comes from government gets funneled through them, it doesn’t get to the people, and there’s a lot of cons that go on. But they’ll find people on the take within their own people there, who will eventually get big bribes to allow all this to happen in their hunting areas and even on the land itself. And nothing will come down to them. That’s just the way it’s been in the past, so that’s the way it is.
And out of all the things in the world that are going on, why would the US make a priority, for government loans and so on, a priority for countries to go along with the so-called gay bill, the homosexual agenda? That’s a priority across the world? Nothing else? Just that? You know… Back with more after this break.
Hi folks, I’m back. We’re Cutting Through The Matrix. As I’ve said before, the US, wherever it goes now, the World Bank does it too and the IMF and everybody else that puts out cash, they demand that every country they go into alter their moralities, and their views on morality, so they can be as debauched as all the rest of the countries that are already conquered. Anyway it says…
U.S. Presses Uganda on Gay Bill (A: ...the homosexual bill.)
allafrica.com / Sarah Namulondo / 27 November 2012
The United States spokeswoman for the State Department, Victoria Nuland, has said that the US is pressing Uganda not to pass an "Anti-Homosexuality Bill".
(A: Now, every culture is supposed to retain its culture, regardless, even under the hypocrisy of the United Nations – and it is really hypocrisy at the United Nations because they want to destroy all families altogether, for goodness sake, and then push this thing across the board. Now, governments should never be involved in morality in the first place; you understand that? That’s a fact. What consenting adults do is their business, as long as it’s not, you know, in the street and you’re falling over them and all that kind of stuff. But they’re involved in morality, and they can go into all areas of morality, and training people... stop smoking, stop that, stop eating this, stop blah-blah-blah, stop, stop, stop. And then pushing all this kind of stuff on them. And you’ve got to understand why they’re doing it all too. It’s the destruction part, because I mentioned it before, from the US military magazine, from an intelligence specialist, that said they’ll promote the debauched culture that’s left of America, that’s turned into America, across the world. And that’s part of weaponization of these countries. Anyway it says…)
The bill was denied in 2009 but resurfaced this year in February when the parliament resumed its proceedings.
MPs applauded as Ndorwa West MP, David Bahati, took to the floor to re-introduce the controversial Bill for reference to the appropriate committee.
What they say there is they don’t want to support homosexuality in their country. Well, that should be their right. You know, as I say, you’ll never stop it, people, whatever they do in their bedrooms, consenting adults, it’s up to them what they’re going to do. But these things should be kept out of all laws. These are countries remember… These are systems that we’re in, these global systems that promote certain things, like the destruction of all family values, and even local community values – they introduce a fake community value, which is you run by commissars that are appointed over you – that’s the wellness programs by the way too; that’s got to do with that. But they’ve got no rights to get in to tell people what to do and all the rest of it. They should have the right to decisions. And they’ve always got reasons for whatever laws or culture that they have. They’ve got reasons, they’ve developed along a certain line, and that kept the cultures intact. Of course they all have to be destroyed.
This article I’ll put up tonight too, is…
Welcome to One Planet Economy Network
(A: It’s from the European Union Parliament, this superparliament they’ve got, the Soviet Parliament.)
One Planet Economy Network (OPEN: EU) was a two year EU funded project (under the EU 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development or FP7).
(A: Of course it’s all about dishing tax money across to big corporations, like everything else is today. But you’ve got to understand that everything, everything today, is international, planned a long time ago, the end of nations, except when they need you to go to war and to fight for the big internationalists. They’ll give you ulterior propaganda, alternate propaganda, but it’s always to get you to go off and fight for things you don’t understand. And it goes through the different partners that they have and so on, the global leaders in the fields...)
Eight international partners were involved in the project, which brought together European and global leaders in the fields of resource accounting, policy and scenario development, stakeholder engagement and project management.
And all that kind of stuff. You understand, to understand what’s even happening in the world you would need something the size of the Rockefeller Foundation, that runs a lot of it, to even find out and try… Even then you’d be stuck to your own department; you couldn’t have all this data in your head. There’s thousands of organizations that are built up, above government, ABOVE government, that all network together above government, and even put their own guys in to your national governments. And of course one of them is the Royal Institute of International Affairs; they’ve always been international. And they’re all using your tax money today, it’s perfect fascism really, where they’re not just bailing out banks that are private companies, but dishing out your tax money to all these different projects, that they run. It’s freebies, freebie cash and grants to massive corporations, especially in the greening industry. They’re all on board on that too; everybody’s got a foot in the greening industry, for stuff they don’t care if it works or not as long as they get all the cash. It makes them awfully rich.
I mentioned too the other day that Obama, and others actually, have gone to what used to be called Burma, Myanmar, and they got the promise from the top chutzpah there that he was going to go make changes, they were going Democratic, and he says, they were irrevocable, they couldn’t change them, they’re definitely going that way. And here’s an article here…
Violent Raid Breaks Up Myanmar Mine Protest
The New York Times / THOMAS FULLER / November 29, 2012
Myanmar security forces use incendiary devices in raid on a protest camp. (A: This is today.)
Witnesses said dozens of monks and other protesters were injured when the security forces used incendiary devices that set fire to protesters’ encampments outside the offices of the Chinese company in charge of the project. The company has a partnership with the powerful military in Myanmar, formerly Burma.
(A: It shows you some of the photographs and you’ll see them all singed and burned.)
The raid came hours before Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, the Nobel laureate and leader of the opposition in Parliament, visited the city of Monywa, near the mine.
Her visit underlined the widespread support the protests had engendered across the country before the raid.
Analysts said the brutal way that the crackdown was carried out could hamper Mr. Thein Sein’s efforts to persuade the country that his government has made a clean break from the military regimes (A: ...that’s a good way of doing it.) that ruled the country for five decades.
“There will be political consequences,” said U Thiha Saw, the editor of Open News Journal and Myanma Danna magazine. “This may be the start of an uglier phase for the government. Things may get a little more complicated.” (A: No, it won’t, because it will depend on all the deals, and financial deals that China, the US, and all the rest of the big boys have made with this country. Back with more after this.)
Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix and... Hypocrisy, hypocrisy, we’ve got so much hypocrisy, as I say. But I mentioned an article a few days ago by John Pilger on an article written that described the Palestinians as really different from everybody else, they show no grief and all this kind of stuff, a culture of martyrdom, by a woman living in Israel, Tel Aviv, and she belongs to the Times Bureau, the Times newspaper. This article is from the Guardian and it says…
Times Bureau Chief in Jerusalem will now have
her Facebook entries edited
guardian.co.uk / Wednesday 28 November 2012 / Glenn Greenwald
The new measure slams shut an important window into a journalist's assumptions, and shows how constricted Israel discussion still is. (A: It always will be though.)
The New York Times has assigned an editor to "work closely" on the social media entries of its Jerusalem Bureau Chief.
While in Gaza reporting on the recent Israeli attack there, Judi Rudoren, the Jerusalem Bureau Chief for the New York Times, wrote several Facebook entries that caused substantial controversy. The episode began when she wrote a Times article on the funeral of the Dalu family, ten of whom (including several small children) were killed when an Israeli bomb destroyed their house. That article suggested several times that Gazans experience relatively little grief when their family members are killed ("There were few if any visible tears at the intense, chaotic, lengthy funeral . . . the tone, far more fundamentalist than funereal, was also a potent sign of the culture of martyrdom that pervades this place . . . the mourners, except for a few close relatives inside the mosque, were neither overcome with emotion nor fed up . . . "). (A: ...she says.)
But it was her subsequent Facebook entries elaborating on that article, first flagged by Phil Weiss of Mondoweiss, which caused real controversy. "While death and destruction (A: ...that goes on...) is far more severe in Gaza than in Israel, it seems like Israelis are almost more traumatized," (A: ...meaning, more human, you see.) she opined. That, she said, is because "the Gazans have a deep culture of resistance and aspiration to martyrdom." (A: In other words, if you have that prejudiced in you, and it’s a prejudice of course, that you’re seeing an inferior type, that by instinct or something they just can’t help but just move towards martyrdom and feel no emotion.) Moreover, "they have such limited lives tha[t] in many ways they have less to lose." (A: You know, much like the Aborigines of Australia; let’s go hunting them today, you know, because as I say, that’s what they did in the 1800s.) Thus: "when I talk to people who just lost a relative, or who are gathering belongings from a bombed-out house, they seem a bit ho-hum." (A: ...like, oh well, you know.)
She then proceeded to embrace the underlying Israeli premise about why the targeting of Palestinian journalists is justifiable ("The spokesman for Al Quds television, the office hit hardest yesterday, talked about news coverage as part of the Palestinian struggle, which is certainly different from the Western media ethic"). And perhaps most strikingly of all, she cited an article by Slate's Dahlia Lithwick, who was in Jerusalem, which described the fear Israelis and her children had from the war, and Rudoren - surrounded by unimaginable carnage in Gaza - said reading Lithwick's article about the trauma of Israelis is what produced her "first tears in Gaza". (A: ...because she’s Jewish, you see; she lives there, and her family, they moved there, and she belongs to a whole bunch of Jewish organizations. So what you are seeing here is really, it’s racism but it’s intergenerational, you understand. It’s intergenerational and it’s moved into the culture itself. It reminded me when I read it of many other things that have happened in the past. This article here actually, goes on and gives you examples of the British system too. It says here…)
Gen. William Westmoreland infamously said in the 1974 documentary (A: This is the US...) "Hearts and Minds" about the Vietnam War (the difficult-to-watch video is here): (A: And the link is here, by the way. He says...)
"The Oriental doesn't put the same high price on life as does a Westerner. Life is plentiful. Life is cheap in the Orient." (A: And also there’s other ones, British generals that have said in the past as well, as they try to dehumanize the folk that they then lord over.)
But as I say, it reminded me of the movie V: for Vendetta. In the movie of course there’s a scientist, a woman scientist who is really excited to use experimental vaccines on these prisoners. They’re all downtrodden, half-starved and all the rest of it, and they go by, one by one. She says, you know eventually daily as I saw them downtrodden, they wouldn’t look you in the eyes anymore, they looked dejected and so on, she began to despise them. Despise them because, see, if they were really human, in other words, they would’ve looked back defiantly, even though they would’ve got a rifle butt in the face if they had. But you see, that’s how racism, and the eugenical type of racism, because it’s all based on that, comes from; it’s all got that in common. And it’s pretty disgusting to see this being carried out, by people who know exactly what they’re doing. And they do know what they’re doing when they write these articles like that.
Now, the death pathway, I’ve talked about the death pathway, the Liverpool pathway, it started off there, of course in Britain. Now when you go in for the doctors, when you’ve maybe broke a hip or whatever, they’ll put you on the pathway and kill you off. After all, you’re a pensioner. You’re taking your pension money, that you paid in for all your life, and the government could use that and throw that cash to international corporations, that they’re funding, as we go green and all that across the planet. And I’m not kidding about that. In this new system you either have a use, for the system, or you don’t, as far as the big boys are concerned; and the same with the up-and-coming children too. I mean, most of them are getting aborted anyway; that’s how far gone the society is today. It’s been under warfare for a long time, and they didn’t even know it. They still don’t know it today, that they’re under warfare. They don’t know that all their opinions are given to them, that they will even agree with now, because they’ve all been brainwashed in that technique; it works awfully well. But it says…
Now sick babies go on death pathway: Doctor's haunting testimony reveals how children are put on end-of-life plan
dailymail.co.uk / Sue Reid and Simon Caldwell / 28 November 2012
Practice of withdrawing food and fluid by tube being used on young patients
Doctor admits starving and dehydrating ten babies to death in neonatal unit
Liverpool Care Pathway subject of independent inquiry ordered by ministers (A: ...the politicians.)
Investigation, including child patients, will look at whether cash payments to hospitals to hit (A: ...and use...) death pathway targets have influenced doctors' decisions. (A: They actually have targets to meet now, you understand. It’s all economics, folks. That’s what you come down to.)
Sick children are being discharged from NHS [National Health Service] hospitals to die at home or in hospices on controversial ‘death pathways’.
Until now, end of life regime the Liverpool Care Pathway was thought to have involved only elderly and terminally-ill adults.
But the Mail can reveal the practice of withdrawing food and fluid by tube is being used on young patients as well as severely disabled newborn babies. (A: So it’s not just the babies, folks.)
One doctor has admitted starving and dehydrating ten babies to death in the neonatal unit of one hospital alone. (A: I watched a documentary not so long ago about this whole eugenics movement, the history of it, and old, old footage and film. There was a guy in Germany at the time, who came out, and he actually appeared in his own movies, like fictional type movies. But he shows you this child, just born, and the nurse is going to cover the child up with a blanket to keep it warm. And he points at all, what he claims were the defects in it, and he pulls the blanket away and looks at the nurse, and she understands, leaving it to die. It wouldn’t be a fit type human being, you know; like they have a classification of little tick-offs on a form, if you’re fit enough to live and serve the system. But here we are. It’s all here. And it says...)
Writing in a leading medical journal, the physician revealed the process can take an average of ten days during which a baby becomes ‘smaller and shrunken’. (A: ...and then it shrinks and it dies. STARVE them to death, folks.)
The LCP – on which 130,000 elderly and terminally-ill adult patients die each year – is now the subject of an independent inquiry ordered by ministers. (A: Well it’s the agenda, so these inquiries go nowhere. This is the agenda.)
The investigation, which will include child patients, will look at whether cash payments to hospitals to hit death pathway targets have influenced doctors’ decisions. (A: Well, they do, yeah.)
Medical critics of the LCP insist it is impossible to say when a patient will die and as a result the LCP death becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. (A: Meaning, you can starve anybody to death, folks.) They say it is a form of euthanasia, used to clear hospital beds and save the NHS money. (A: It’s true. They want that money for other big projects.)
The use of end of life care methods on disabled newborn babies was revealed in the doctors’ bible, the British Medical Journal.
Earlier this month, an un-named doctor wrote of the agony of watching the protracted deaths of babies. The doctor described one case of a baby born with ‘a lengthy list of unexpected congenital anomalies’, whose parents agreed to put it on the pathway.
The doctor wrote: ‘They wish for their child to die quickly once the feeding and fluids are stopped. They wish for pneumonia. They wish for no suffering. They wish for no visible changes to their precious baby.
‘Their wishes, however, are not consistent with my experience. Survival is often much longer than most physicians think; (A: You understand, the human body is an incredible thing, and it really struggles to survive, a newborn and even in the elderly. It wants to live, you understand. And this article here might lead into injections for euthanasia, the way it’s worded here; I can tell you that right now.)
‘Parents and care teams are unprepared for the sometimes severe changes that they will witness in the child’s physical appearance as severe dehydration ensues.
‘I know, as they cannot, the unique horror of witnessing a child become smaller and shrunken, as the only route out of a life that has become excruciating to the patient or to the parents who love their baby.’
So as I say, you’re going to find that this will probably lead to them getting the right to just, you know, stick in an injection and that’s it, done. This is progress, folks, for those who don’t understand what progress means. You’re living a very amazing agenda, an agenda that the big top capitalists, the true capitalists, who created communism, used in the Soviet system, very freely in fact, and now it’s combined together.
Why Is The US Building A Secret $100 Million Underground Facility Outside Tel Aviv?
businessinsider.com / Robert Johnson / Nov. 29, 2012
Leave it to legendary Walter Pincus from the Washington Post to flesh out a Request for Proposal construction project planned for Israel (A: ... the site is...) called Site 911. (A: Who’s kidding who here, eh?)
The oddly named project will cost up to $100 million, take more than two years to complete, and can only be built by workers from specific countries with proper security clearances. Palestinians need not apply.
When complete the well-guarded compound will have five levels buried underground and six additional outbuildings on the above grounds, within the perimeter. At about 127,000 square feet, the first three floors will house classrooms, an auditorium, and a laboratory — all wedged behind shock resistant doors — with radiation protection and massive security.
Only one gate will allow workers entrance and exit during the project and that will be guarded by only Israelis.
The bottom two floors are smaller, according to the full line of schematics uploaded to the Army's Acquisition Business Web Site (A: And the link is on here too; I’ll put them all up at cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the night.), and possibly used for equipment and storage.
As impressive as the American design features already are, Ada Karmi-Melamede Architects will decorate the entire site with rocks it chooses, but are paid for by the contractor, and provide three outdoor picnic tables. (A: I guess that will look like a little picnic site or something.)
Pincus also found this detailed description of the mezuzahs that will adorn every door in the facility:
These mezuzas, notes the [US Army] Corps, “shall be written in inerasable ink, on . . . uncoated leather parchment” and be handwritten by a scribe “holding a written authorization according to Jewish law.” The writing may be “Ashkenazik or Sepharadik” but “not a mixture” and “must be uniform.”
Also, “The Mezuzahs shall be proof-read by a computer at an authorized institution for Mezuzah inspection, as well as manually proof-read for the form of the letters by a proof-reader authorized by the Chief Rabbinate.” The mezuza shall be supplied with an aluminum housing with holes so it can be connected to the door frame or opening. Finally, “All Mezuzahs for the facility shall be affixed by the Base’s Rabbi or his appointed representative and not by the contractor staff.”
Along with this request is another called 911 Phase 2.
Also in the $100 million range, Pincus finds the “complex facility with site development challenges” requiring services that include “electrical, communication, mechanical/ HVAC [heating, ventilation, air conditioning] and plumbing” requirements telling; and along with the fact that the contractor must posses a U.S. or Israeli Secret Security Clearance, he believes this phase to be a secure command center.
Pulitzer Prize winning, Yale grad, born in 1932 whose worked intelligence and media in D.C. since 1955 closes his piece with these shadowy words.
"The purpose of Site 911 is [un] clear."
So there’s, again, the US taxpayer at work. Now here’s another article too, it’s to do with the Desertec Concept. As I say, there’s thousands and thousands of organizations with big, big, big business, all intertwined at the top, way above everything; it never appears in the media and so on. Desertec is an idea for a corporation that came out of a foundation, that was set up by the Club of Rome; you know, this big so-called think tank, this impartial think tank. It says…
THE Desertec CONCEPT and Desertec-UK
The Desertec Foundation (formerly the 'TREC' international network of scientists and engineers), in association with the Club of Rome, has developed the Desertec concept, described below, to take advantage of the truly enormous quantities of energy falling as sunlight on the world's deserts—and wind energy in those regions too. (A: In other words, this corporation is going to live awfully well, in all the countries that have signed onto all these treaties, where they’re going to throw money at alternative energies, and you can’t lose. How can you lose when they’re going to throw billions and billions at you? But they’re doing it because they want to save the planet, you understand. And they want to make it a worldwide grid. It’s all part of the worldwide grid too, you know.)
Now the Desertec Industrial Initiative, a consortium of blue-chip companies, has been formed to make it happen, and the Desertec University Network has been established to promote Desertec-related research and teaching. (A: See, you understand, if you want to survive, or you’ve got children you want to survive, you either wear a black uniform walking around with a machine gun with a badge on you for the government, or the international government. Or you work for a bureaucracy in government. Or you have to get into all these so-called nonprofit organizations that rake in billions of tax money from the public and have corporations on the side. I mean, that’s just fact. This is true. It’s just the way it is. It’s true. Thousands and thousands of them… they never hit the media, you know. But I’ll put this one up tonight and two or three other articles about it too, about their literature. It’s interesting too, it says...)
DESERTEC began in 2003 and was developed by an international network of politicians, scientists and economists known as the TREC network, from which the DESERTEC Foundation arose. (A: Now, they had countries listed on it, across the Middle East, that were all eventually torn up by the color revolutions. It’s interesting, that, because now they’ll get them all in now, you see. They always know what’s coming up ahead, all these big, you know, guys at the top, like wars and overthrows, long before you hear of it, or anybody hears of it. They already know what they have to do. If somebody is in the way they’ll just overthrow you, you know; it’s as simple as that.)
Trans-Mediterranean Renewable Energy Cooperation (TREC) - http://www.trec-uk.org.uk/press/trans-csp_press_release5.pdf
Use the DESERTEC Foundation Flyer to spread the word - desertec.org
This article here too, is to do with Australia. I mean, Julia Gillard, who is not popular in Australia because she’s such a liar. Because she is a liar. She’s on many TV tapes there showing how she was going to definitely be against carbon taxes. And of course, she lied and got in, and she just immediately did all the Fabian stuff that she knew she was going to do. But she also lied too about slush funds for unions that her boyfriend was involved in; apparently money was even deposited in her account as well. Anyway it says…
Letter contradicts PM
smh.com.au / November 29, 2012 / Mark Baker
There are new claims that Julia Gillard helped setting up a union slush fund that was ultimately used to funnel crooked money. (A: I’ll put this up tonight; it’s mainstream news in Australia. Because she’s contradicting written proof of her involvement in all of this. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt, we’re Cutting Through The Matrix and talking about Australia and the Fabianist Julia Gillard, and how literally there’s an inquiry going on and the evidence is turning up, written evidence of course, that she helped set up a slush fund, a union slush fund that was ultimately used to funnel crooked money. So things are not going well for the Fabian, unless her pals pull the strings, or get some big thing happening to divert everybody off into some other area, which they are known to do as well. But we’ll wait and see how this goes.
Also in Australia, and I’ve mentioned about the carbon currency is to be another big boon, as they all live off the peasants at the bottom, all these big corporations and so on, and governments, and all those who work for government. Because they don’t work for you. They don’t work for you, they work for governments, you understand. And they work for world government and corporations. But here’s Australia again…
Australian bank accepts carbon credits as currency
carboncurrencyfoundation.org / Written by Carbon Currency Foundation
The idea of buying and selling carbon credits stored in trees on farms or in forests (A: It’s all hypothetical stuff, but now they’re putting it in as the new… It’s the new religion, you understand, you have to really believe in it awfully hard.), has been adopted by an international merchant bank. (A: Guess who?...) Rothschild Australia is setting up a managed investment scheme, that aims to buy and sell carbon credits to multinational companies, to offset the companies' greenhouse gas emissions.
Rothschild's Simon Games-Thomas says the scheme is more about learning how to legally sell this new type of commodity, rather than turning a profit. (A: It’s not about profit, no.) “It’s less of a profitable enterprise than trying to get involved in the market place. (A: Even though, mind you, the media in Europe has been mentioning the profits off carbon trading for the last, oh, six or seven years, because they are way ahead of it. It’s in the billions and billions, multibillions.)
“There’ve been a lot of questions asked by clients of the bank about how the protocol or how working in a carbon constrained world is going to affect their business and in response to those questions we decided to put together the consortium.” (A: Well, it’s massive. Remember, the Rothschilds too, in Britain, said that their private bank in Switzerland, the family’s private big bank in Switzerland, all the carbon credits of the world are going to go through that bank. Can you imagine the trillions of credits going through every night? and just the interest alone going on that? ...that’s theirs. Do you understand? Not bad of an idea, eh? It’s just an idea, it’s not real; nothing is real like that.)
The move has been welcomed by Professor Snow Barlow, from the research centre for Greenhouse Accounting. (A: ...Greenhouse Accounting... [Alan chuckles.])
Professor Barlow says the process of trading carbon credits can earn money for farmers with tree lots, as well as having an obvious benefit for the environment. (A: No, the farmers, you see, they can’t farm anymore. You see, that’s what’s happened in Australia as well. They’re told by the government, you can’t farm anymore. And also the big corporations are grabbing cheap land and getting bonuses and cut things from governments to buy the cheap land, calling it carbon sinks, you see; like an investment.)
So it’s all a big joke. But we live in jokes. You know, it’s another religion. It’s a good religion, this one. As I say, you need an awful lot of true faith to believe in it. But faith can be helped along by big bucks flowing in, if you’re a company dealing with all of this. It’s quite amazing how things work in humanity isn’t it?
Now obviously, as I’ve said before, the Jimmy Savile scandal, and he was a procurer for, you know, very important people in Britain, would have to be quashed. And it has been quashed...
BBC inquiry into Jimmy Savile scandal 'to stay secret'
telegraph.co.uk / 28 Nov 2012
There’s your democracy, and we’re for the people, and all that stuff. It’s all done, folks. You know. You vote for government? Why do you vote? Wake up!… And maybe grow up. Maybe grow up, eh. Try to become wise. Grow up, stop being children. Young children understand this is wrong, but once you’ve had the taste of the schooling and your hedonistic society, you know, that’s it.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Palestine's UN Upgrade to Nonmember Observer Status
Inuit Sitting on Billions of Barrels of Oil
Uganda---US Pushes Uganda on Gay Bill
EU "One Planet Economy Network"
New "Pro-Democracy" Myanmar Use Incendiaries on Protesters
Prejudiced NYT Bureau Chief in Jerusalem in the Spotlight
Eugenics Britain---Now Sick Babies Go On Death Pathway by National Health "Service"
Why is US Building Secret Site Called 911 in Israel?
Club of Rome's Desertec Concept Expanding
Same as Above--Worldwide
& More on Above
Gillard ---Australia ---Union Slush Fund Scandal Deepens
Rothschild Merchant Banks Accept Carbon Credits as Currency
BBC Inquiry into Savile Scandal to Stay Secret