Oct. 19, 2012 (#1197)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

 

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Oct. 19, 2012:

Monopoly:
Red, Blue or Green, Run by the Unseen:

"Agenda's on Target Selling Off Public Assets
"To Create Interdependence", Different Facets
Of the World United Under Regions,
Controlled by an Army of U.N. Legions,
All Business is Corporate, International,
No Small Entrepreneurs, Just Not Fashionable,
All Food Supplied by Big Agribusiness,
Eat GMO, You'll be Dumb, Sick and Listless,
From the Club of Rome, the Global Think-Tank
"Democracy's Unworkable", You've Them to Thank,
Richest Men in the World Run All the Parties,
Bringing You Fascism, All You Voting Patsies,
Entertainment Debases Normals of Every People,
Leaving Dysfunctional, Obedient, Simple Sheeple"
© Alan Watt Oct. 19, 2012

 

Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Oct. 19, 2012 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)

 

Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 19th of October 2012. Newcomers, I suggest you make good use of the website cuttingthroughthematrix.com. You’ll find, I don’t know how many audios are up there now, there’s well over a thousand audios, and always growing.  I go through the system, the big system you're born into and explain the guys behind it, the guys who gave you your reality.  And they really did give you your reality because they hired thousands and thousands of think tanks and specialists, to work round the clock, every year, for the last hundred years basically, to guide society the way it should be guided into the perfect society, to suit the Masters, you see. It’s well documented by those involved.  The history is definitely there and it cannot be denied. So help yourself to the audios there and find out what’s all behind it. You’ll find most of your reality is nonsense, including even your behavior in fact, and the modes that you adopt in your culture because these guys give you your culture. They run the media, the entertainment industry, everything, to make sure you’re the ideal, basically, airhead for your era. And they’ve done it to us all, generation by generation. It’s all a science, you see. And find out how it’s done, who’s behind it, and the big players who came out and published their books about it, that were heavily involved in the whole process.

 

Also too, remember you are the audience that bring me to you. I don’t bring on advertisers as guests who are there to sell their products. I don’t have shares in companies that sell products. All I have are the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com to help me tick over. If you’d like to help me out, buy them or you can donate, and you can go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com to find out how to do it.  [Order and donation options listed above.]  And straight donations, remember, are awfully, awfully welcome in these austere times. I’m not building an empire here; I’m just trying to get the truth out.

 

And what a truth it is, as we go through the farce of politics, which is just a Punch and Judy show for the public. You don’t vote a new guy in. You vote the old bunch out, you’re sick of them.  That’s how it works. And you go from left to right and left to right, and you always vote them out after a time, you’re so sick of them. And that stops you having rebellions every so often. Of course, the politicians are just that, they are the front men put in; as their own historian said at the Council on Foreign Relations, every President and Prime Minister has been a member of this organization for a hundred years, at the top, across the world, by the way. Which means that they’re just the show men and they’re there to take the rotten tomatoes and all the curses and all the rest of it; that’s their job. There’s one agenda. This one agenda steamrolls ahead with everyone involved in it, because there’s no other agenda, just the one.

 

We’re going into the stage now where we’re completely global, as you know, and we’re selling off assets across our own countries to overseas.  That was planned out in the 1990s at the big two-year meeting they held in France.  Every country attended and they drafted up this legislation so that any outsider, any country could invest in your country. And you have to go by their rules and their paychecks, etc., not your own. If you try to deny them, they’re allowed through the World Trade Organization to sue your country for billions of dollars and pounds. That’s actually happened to some countries already. So, it’s the selloff of nations, under the guise of unifying the world, under a global system. And that is your future. That really is your future. They’ve been teaching students for years, at some of the better universities, the higher up ones, the Ivy League, to learn Chinese, for instance, and they have been. Many of them have been brought up with Chinese nannies for the last 20 years, because the future will be for them, as China dominates the world, as it’s intended to. It was planned to do, not by China but the ones who already rule the world. Back with more after this break.

 

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix.  It really is such an amazing system we live through, because, you understand, there’s only one system. There’s one system and you see the same M.O. wherever you go. You know it’s the one system. Canada, Britain and other countries, after that 1990s meeting, when they went through the selling off of assets and infrastructure to private, overseas investors, they all rampaged ahead and sold off the water supplies, the roads, highways, everything. Rothschild did it in Britain; he put forth the bill to privatize the roads.  And everything skyrockets in price, electricity, everything.

 

Well, Australia’s doing the same thing, because they’re catching up now, rather quickly too. This is Western Australia and it says…

 

Assets sell-off worth 'tens of billions' to WA

au.news.yahoo.com / Shane Wright and Daniel Mercer / October 19, 2012

 

The State Government should sell to the nation's superannuation funds, most of Perth's electricity system, all ports and even convert major roads to tollways under a plan to slash debt (Alan:  ...the same excuse, eh.) and free-up cash for desperately needed (A:  ...magnates.  Sorry, it says projects here...) projects.

 

Infrastructure Australia believes Verve, Western Power, Fremantle Ports, the Water Corporation and Forest Products Commission should be sold in a move that would reap the State tens of billions of dollars.

 

Verve could be worth $2.5 billion to the State Government, Fremantle Ports $500 million and the Water Corporation more than $5 billion.  (A:  It’s going for a song.)

 

The authority believes by selling publicly owned assets (A:  ...publicly owned assets…THE authority believes...  Understand the wording of this? the standard wording… THE authority believes by selling publicly owned assets, that’s supposed to be all yours…), the nation's infrastructure deficit could be turned around while the assets themselves would be better run and at a lower cost. (A:  ...as we all get gouged, as they privatize it and skyrocket the prices. We’ve all found that out elsewhere. It doesn’t stop the same con, though, you see. It’s a worldwide con, it has to go on. It’s one agenda.)

 

It follows a Productivity Commission report this week that urged the privatisation of WA's electricity network, saying it would help keep a lid on power prices to consumers.  (A:  Now, they’ve already told us, at many world meetings, that we have to pay about 10 times more for power than you’re paying right now. It’s already started in Ontario; they’ve told us that from the power company, the private power company that it was sold off too.)

 

The Infrastructure Australia report was prompted by continuing high levels of government ownership and complaints, particularly by industry groups, that States have been unable to keep up with providing infrastructure necessary for the economy to operate productively.  (A:  So they go into the reasons why they’ve got to sell it off, basically. This is the con game.)

 

At the same time, Australian super funds hold more than $1 trillion in assets.

 

National infrastructure co-ordinator Michael Deegan said States could sell many assets and sink proceeds into schools, hospitals and roads.  (A:  What’s the point in doing that if they’re going to privatize the roads? Hmm?)

 

"Governments around Australia need to explore new methods of financing and developing the infrastructure needed to improve national productivity," Mr Deegan said.

 

It’s all about productivity, you see. That’s our job in life, is to be producers, according to the United Nations.  Then you find this one here, about Canada and it says here…

 

Chairman Harper and the Chinese Sell-Out

Andrew Nikiforuk, 11 Oct 2012, TheTyee.ca

 

By Nov. 1 three of China's national oil companies will have more power to shape Canada's energy markets as well as challenge the politics of this country than Canadians themselves. (A:  And they go on to say...) And you can thank Prime Minister Stephen Harper for this economic treason. (A:  No.  You see, as I say, that deal was struck in the 90s, for two years; they kept it out of the mainstream media as best they could. The CBC did touch on it at one point and they let one person in, who was a communist from Canada, and only asked, nothing about Canadians, she says, we just hope you treat the Chinese workers well, in your own country, and that was what she really went for. But it was a signed deal then; they tried to keep the lid on this. Every country was involved, long before Harper came along.)

 

The new agreement will not only support more foreign takeovers of Canada's natural resources, but pave the way for CNOOC's dramatic $15-billion purchase of Nexen.

 

That controversial deal, which the majority of ordinary Canadians oppose, represents the largest-ever overseas takeover of any firm by a Chinese national oil company.

 

Both the trade deal and Nexen sell-off prove that no one betrays Canadian interests better than a right-wing prime minister (A:  It wouldn’t matter who was in, because the left wing are, they all signed it too. Actually, they came up with the idea for the French two-year meeting.) beholden to the interests of Big Oil and the myths of free trade.

 

Now every literate Canadian recognizes that Harper, the libertarian economist, has been flying kites with pipeline lobbyists funded by China's national oil companies as well as the one-per-centers now ruling China for some time now.

 

Given that oil consumption in the United States is steadily dropping and that the incompetent petro state of Alberta has flooded the market with bitumen due to bad planning, low royalties and sheer stupidity, Harper is frantically trying to save his Tory cohorts and their special petroleum interests by peddling bitumen to Asian refiners at any cost. He’s prepared to sell out Canada in the process.  (A:  Well as I say, it was his turn to get in, and carry on with the same agenda.)

 

In fact "Chairman Harper" (and that's what members of his own party are calling him) crafted an Omnibus Bill last spring that cancelled federal science programs, gutted critical environmental legislation, made it easier to pollute water, centralized federal power, diminished protection for endangered species and attacked environmental groups. The bill not only makes it easier to build Northern Gateway but to serve some of the least transparent and most corrupt corporations in China: Sinopec and CNOOC.

 

But Harper's Omnibus Bill, which declared Canada’s formal entry into the ranks of dysfunctional petro states, was but window dressing for the Canada-China Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Act (FIPPA). (A: The mainstream have hardly touched that, Canada-China Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Act, FIPPA.) It's the most significant trade deal since NAFTA, but you won't read much about it in the national press. Given its deplorable content Harper appropriately inked the massive give-away in Vladivostok last month and then quietly tabled the deal in Ottawa without so much as a press release.

 

Osgoode law professor Gus Van Harten, an expert on such international doings, quickly found out why. After reading the brief document, he declared it a travesty and a formidable assault on Canada's democratic traditions. (A:  I wonder what they were?)  For starters the deal gives Chinese investors more rights and protections than Canadian entrepreneurs could ever win in China's incredibly corrupt markets.

 

Moreover the deal "allows Chinese companies to sue Canada outside of Canadian courts.  (A: That’s through the WTO.) Remarkably, the lawsuits can proceed behind closed doors. This shift to secrecy reverses a longstanding policy of the Canadian government."

 

Appallingly, the treaty would give Sinopec, one of the big Chinese backers of the Northern Gateway pipeline, the right to sue the government of British Columbia if it blocks the project. Sinopec could also demand that only Chinese labour and materials be used on the pipeline. (A:  Well, they’re already bringing in, for the mines they’re putting up in Canada, they’re bringing in mainland Chinese; I read that last week.) Moreover the treaty gives Chinese state owned companies "the right to full protection and security from public opposition."

 

The agreement, like all bad deals, comes wrapped in totalitarian paper. The deal does not require provincial consent. It comes without any risk-benefit analysis. And it can be ratified into law without parliamentary debate. The more Harper wants to do business with China, the more he acts like another tank in Tiananmen Square. Barring a revolt within Harper's own party, the trade deal automatically becomes law on Nov. 1.

 

To date Elizabeth May, leader of the Green Party, is the only politician demanding an emergency debate in parliament on a treaty that will deliver "reduced sovereignty" and "reduced democracy" and all "for more Chinese ownership of Canada's resources."

 

Well, it makes no difference, because as I say, the left-wing, look at the left-wing in Australia, and how well they’re doing with their deals there with the Chinese too.  So forget this left-wing/right-wing stuff; that’s the con. It’s one agenda and any politician, of any party, whenever they’re in power, is going to continue the same agenda. They’ve been doing it since the 90s, by the way, as I say, for those who don’t know.  And then this one here, it’s another one too.

 

In two weeks, Prime Minister Harper could pass the most secretive and sweeping trade deal of a generation. - leadnow.ca/stop-fipa

 

It’s about the same thing. And it’s really a protest if you want to add your name to it, you can protest to it, and just send it in… for all the good it will do anyway. As I say, every country in the world signed on to this deal, in the West I should say, including the Far East, Australia, New Zealand and so on. They always had a plan to sell off all your assets, and so-called publicly owned assets.  Not that you really own anything at all. 

 

And this article here, it’s from Scotland actually, that really is the test bed for the new man and woman, you see. I think there won’t be any men really; they’ll have a new name for them, after they’ve finished. I’ve mentioned this article before, this particular topic, and it says…

 

(home-education.biz/forum/57679-post112.html)

 

Inverclyde Council has taken Girfec (A:  Girfec came out from Sarkozy and a whole bunch of them who were involved in creating this new society, birth to death monitoring, behaviorism is involved where you have to see psychiatrists/psychologists from childhood… ALL children by the way. They come into the homes and study all the parents, and to train the new generation the way that they want them to be: the perfect little, you know clones.) to a new level, it believes. The council has adapted the Girfec Shanarri well-being indicators (A:  It sounds nice that, well-being, eh...) to get it right not just for every child but every citizen and community as well (see chart, right).  (A:  It’s got a chart to show you how it works.)

 

Angela Edwards (A:  ...and I can’t find anything on this woman, her background, or whatever.), the council’s head of inclusive education, culture and corporate policy, (A:  Now, think about this…) the council’s head of inclusive education, culture and corporate policy, explains: “All authorities will be using the well-being indicators to plan in children’s services, but we don’t just want a nurturing class or school (A:  What’s a nurturing class? Is it something where they stick a tit in your mouth, with milk in a bottle or something, you know, and you suck on it?), we want a nurturing authority. (A:  I can imagine that, that’s where they splatter it all over your face when you go in to complain.) We adapted the descriptors so they could be applied to the whole council.”

 

So whether the council is planning a new road or refurbishing a museum, the well-being indicators drive that planning.

 

“Any child who lives in Inverclyde becomes a citizen of Inverclyde and lives in a community in Inverclyde. It’s about trying to impact on that child’s whole life,” says Ms Edwards.  (A:  So in other words it’s about bringing you up from a baby basically, monitoring you the whole way, and they come in with all their agencies if they think you’re wandering from the designed path that you’re supposed to be on, and engineering a society. That’s what it’s about, you see.)

 

The vision for a nurturing Inverclyde is focusing on making Inverclyde a place which nurtures all its citizens (A:  ...BIG BROTHER... It’s actually Big Mama, you know.) ensuring that everyone has an opportunity to have a good quality of life, good mental and physical well-being (A:  ...because they want to check your mind all the time), getting it right for every child, citizen and community.”  (A:  Back with more after this.)

 

Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about the big kaleidoscopic system we’re in, where we have lots of bread and circuses, etc; most things really are bread and circuses. Your politicians are bread and circuses; they take all the bread and give you a circus. But the thing is, people never catch on to it because you see, they’re not the bosses. The guys above them are the bosses.

 

I’ve gone through the history of the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations, across the whole planet, set up by the big banking boys; that’s the ones who lent to nations, the biggest money lenders, about 13 families. They set up their own little club that eventually got a Royal Charter, so the Royal Institute of International Affairs; and the Council on Foreign Relations across the rest of the world. They decided to take over all the resources of the world, run it properly; the wise men would run the world properly, all these tall guys.  That’s where it’s all going. They draft up all the amalgamations. They actually drafted up the amalgamation for Europe; they did it, they admit that. They drafted up the plans for NAFTA; they came on television in Canada and admitted it, openly. We don’t vote these guys in. They’re a private organization, a private club, of incredibly wealthy people. They own all the media. And we sit and just take it, of course. We watch this… Most folk get sucked back into the politics again; it’s like a big circus when it comes on, and that’s why it works all the time. You know, who are you going to vote for, that guy or that guy.  It’s just astonishing how it works so well. I left politics a long time ago after I realized what it was, and even then luckily I had never been in it.  So it’s rather transparent, when you realize there’s a big agenda run by much bigger minds at the top.

 

They wanted an integrated world and they would own all the natural resources through all their thousands of corporations, that they own. You understand, for all the thousands of corporations out there, they amalgamate them and amalgamate them, because you see, you’ve got to have monopolization of anything, including the media; you even have that on different radio hosts as well.  Monopolization, you knock all the rest of the competition out. And they’ve done it all through business. And these are all front organizations, with the major shareholders are the same guys who are the world’s money lenders. It gives the appearance of competition.

 

Also at the same time too, as they bring down your culture into utter destruction, of your particular cultures...  It’s all done as far as I’m concerned.  It’s over with, step by step by step. It didn’t take long at all. I’ve mentioned Jimmy Savile, for instance, at the BBC, one of many pervs working there. It’s got a lifelong history of perversion at the BBC. It’s generally little boys they’re into, but they’re trying to keep that out as best as they can. They go on about Jimmy Savile, and no one knew, of course, the ones who were all around him, because they can’t open up the can of worms.  Because you see, the British government owns the BBC; it’s been the biggest communist propaganda agency out there, forever. And they’ve put on the perverted stuff and deculturalized the public into perversions, with all their terrible dramas and all the rest of it over the years. This article here goes on about the…

 

Labour (A:  ...government; Labour, or Liberal.) faces embarrassment over its calls for a wide-ranging inquiry into Jimmy Savile as senior party figures have previously called for the relaxation of child sex laws.

telegraph.co.uk / Martin Beckford, Home Affairs Editor / 17 Oct 2012

 

(A:  You understand, Savile wasn’t alone. There’s a lot of pervs above him all pushing for this inter-, what they want to call, intergenerational sex. I’ve mentioned it many times. I mentioned years ago, in fact, at least ’98 on the radio, that you will see live sex performed on television, dramas, comedies and so on.  Live sex, it’s coming. Step-by-step it’s coming. And even child sex as well. That’s going to be mainstream. And there’ll be no such word left as pedophilia, you see. That’s been agreed at world meetings; I’ve mentioned the world meetings and went through them before.)

 

Harriet Harman, the Opposition deputy leader, said the allegations that the late TV and radio presenter abused dozens of young boys and girls had “cast a stain” on the BBC and other trusted institutions. (A:  Who trusts them?)

 

But at the time Savile was at the height of his fame, Miss Harman was calling for the relaxation of the law on child pornography. (A:  This is the top politician for the left-wings, you see.)

 

She was a leading light in the pressure group now known as Liberty, which advocated the lowering of the age of consent to 14.   (A:  But they actually wanted it lower. See, you just lower it once, and you lower it again until... you can go to babies, you know.)

 

The organisation, then run by the Health Secretary under Tony Blair, Patricia Hewitt, even counted among its affiliates a number of extreme pro-paedophilia groups whose leaders were later jailed.  (A:  They’re still there though, still out there.)

 

It means that any independent public inquiry into the culture that allowed Savile to abuse children for so long with impunity, could end up looking into the radical left-wing demands for the liberalisation of child sex laws that were made in the 1970s. 

 

Tim Loughton, the former children’s minister, said “It is rather eyebrow-raising to see Harriet Harman’s newfound zeal for clamping down on sexual exploitation of children, given that she was decidedly dodgy on the subject when she was part of an organisation calling for the relaxation of these laws.  (A:  These are top people running your government… Well, they’re not running your governments. They run the low-down parts like the culture and stuff.)

 

“What we are seeing now is the result of a culture of complacency which has allowed celebrities and others to cover up their crimes, and Harriet Harman must share some of the blame for not taking these matters much more seriously.”   (A:  Now, I think you’d have to get even further than that, and find out what’s in this woman’s head, that she was wanting child sex and all the laws relaxed. What’s she into?  Huh?  What’s she into? She belonged to the groups, folks.)

 

As The Daily Telegraph first disclosed in 2009, in the 1970s the extreme end of the sexual liberation movement included groups who openly campaigned for the abolition of the age of consent. The Paedophile Information Exchange and Paedophile Action for Liberation affiliated themselves to the National Council for Civil Liberties (A:  You’d never imagine that was under that, National Council for Civil Liberties was all a pedophilic run organization.), now known as Liberty.   (A:  Liberty before puberty, I guess they want to get pre-puberty as well. Back with more after this break.)

 

Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix, reading about the pervs that run what you think is government, and what they’ve been up to for an awful long time, as they destroy the cultures, for everybody, you see. Again, actually they’re tied in with all the entertainment industry, the BBC, etc., as they push their filth across the planet. And make things that used to be abhorrent quite natural to do, you see; they always do it in a different situation, and the music playing, as they rape children, and stuff like that. Anyway it says here…

 

NCCL (A:  National Council for Civil Liberties, which was actually part of the Pedophile Action for Liberation ...  Pedos for God’s sake.) complained to the press watchdog about their treatment by tabloid newspapers and in one article admitted it had “plenty of contact” with PIE (A:  ...you know, the PIE, the Pedophile Information Exchange, a piece of the pie…), and argued that children are harmed by having to go to police and courts after (A:  ...they’ve been raped by an adult. Sorry, it says here…) a “mutual relationship with an adult”. (A:  That’s how they try to get round it, oh it’s doing the children harm having to go through the police and complain about this; it’s a ‘mutual relationship’.)

 

In 1976 the NCCL submitted a response to the Government’s plans to reform sex laws that was dubbed a Lolita’s Charter as it claimed “childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in with an adult result in no identifiable damage”.  (A:  That was the big rage back then. They had it in Canada too, by the way.)

 

The organisation said that children as young as 14 should be able to consent to sex, to reduce the “harmful effects of the present laws”. (A:  ...which get the people who seduce and pervert them, you know. It’s just astonishing what’s been going on, but folk really… You can’t shock folk with this now because they’ve all been contaminated, with watching all the rubbish on television.)

 

It went on to say it is “logical” for the age of consent to be abolished but “we fear” it would not be “politically possible”.

 

Miss Harman, then a newly qualified solicitor, joined the group as legal officer two years later.

 

In April 1978 she wrote the NCCL’s response to the Protection of Children Bill, which was put before Parliament in order to tighten the laws on child pornography by banning indecent images of under-16s.

 

It claimed that the new law could lead to “damaging and absurd prosecutions” and “increase censorship”. (A:  Oh, we can’t have censorship.)

 

She suggested that pornographic photographs or films of children should not be considered indecent unless it could be shown that the subject had suffered, and that prosecutors would have to prove harm rather than defendants having to justify themselves.

 

The NCCL's submission stated: “Although this harm may be of a somewhat speculative nature, where participation falls short of physical assault, it is none-the-less justifiable to restrain activities by photographer which involve placing children under the age of 14 (or, arguably, 16) in sexual situations.

 

“We suggest that the term 'indecent’ be qualified as follows: – A photograph or film shall not for this purpose be considered indecent (a) by reason only that the model is in a state of undress (A:  These are the Pedos demanding all this, up there with all the politicians, who are Pedos, obviously, themselves. Obviously!) (whether complete or partial); (b) unless it is proved or is to be inferred from the photograph or film that the making of the photograph or film might reasonably be expected to have caused the model physical harm or pronounced psychological or emotional disorder.”

 

It added: “Our amendment places the onus of proof on the prosecution to show that the child was actually harmed.” (A:  So in other words, it’s all the victims’ fault, you see. Just put all the onus on them.)

 

Miss Harman left NCCL in 1982 when she was elected MP for Camberwell and Peckham (A:  ...interesting name.), by which time several members of PIE had been jailed for conspiracy to corrupt public morals.

 

A spokesman for Miss Harman said: “This allegation is an outrageous slur. Harriet has fought for child protection from sexual abuse over the last 30 years – any attempt to suggest otherwise is untrue and malicious.   (A:  ...it says.)

 

“It is completely untrue that she supported the lowering of the age of consent to 14 – she supported equalising the age of homosexual consent to make it the same as the age of heterosexual consent which is 16.”   (A:  Actually in Canada, it is… In Canada I think it’s 16, heterosexual, but they actually got it lowered for anal sex, to down to 14, for folk who don’t know that. See, it’s the same agenda in Canada and elsewhere, as I say. This is a world organization, you understand. It’s a world agenda.)

 

And as I said before too, you will see live sex on the jaded screen. You know, you’re coming down to bread and circuses, down to the end as your countries are plundered by foreign corporations colluding with your politicians and businessmen.  And…

 

Nicole Kidman quits real sex film

thesun.co.uk / IAN GARLAND / 19th October 2012

 

NICOLE Kidman has reportedly quit new movie Nymphomaniac after finding out she had to have real sex on screen.

 

The 45-year-old actress was due to star alongside Uma Thurman, Charlotte Gainsbourg, Stellan Skarsgård, Willem Dafoe, Christian Slater and Shia LaBeouf in Lars Von Trier's raunchy new film.

 

But sources says she threw in the towel after discovering Von Trier - who directed her in 2003's Dogville - planned to make his actors romp for real.  (A:  ...that’s real sex.)

 

Nymphomaniac follows sex addict Joe (Gainsbourg) as she recounts her erotic experiences to a man who has saved her from a vicious beating.  (A:  I guess if she did that she’d obviously be a sadomasochist, if she just got beaten up and she starts telling this other guy about her sex life.)

 

It may have scared Kidman off, but the prospect of having real sex on the big screen excites and "terrifies" Shia LaBeouf.

 

The Transformers star was reportedly so desperate to be cast, he sent Von Trier home made sex tapes to prove he was up to the part.  (A:  What a disgusting lot, folks. And you really don’t know what’s running you in your culture, as you lap it up, and what effects it’s having on you and all those around you. Because it’s not just dehumanizing, it’s lowering your whole quality and value, VALUE of life. That’s the key to it, value of life.)

 

Another article I’ll put up too is Name & Shame Social Workers site. It’s not a bad site actually, it seems. It’s mainly about Britain, but I think they’re trying to expand into other countries. Because it’s about people who are under the gun by Social Work departments that grab children, etc., etc. At least they’re getting organized and fighting back. Because it’s a huge business now in grabbing children for the authorities. And again, they’re involved in a lot of the Pedo stuff themselves, for those who haven’t been following it over the years. So it’s time they fought back to what’s happening and hopefully they’ll get something done.

 

Another one too, it’s interesting.  I never read the article but I noted something about a week or two ago about some futurist magazine talking about the coming phones, and eventually it gets into your brain, the chip in the brain, like the one they put in DARPA’s paraplegic some years ago, to make it all exciting. Well good luck to you if you want that. Lots will go for it, and they won’t live long. But anyway it says…

 

Mobile phones can cause brain tumours, court rules.

(A:  So a court has done this, a High Court.)

A landmark court case has ruled there is a link between using a mobile phone and brain tumours, paving the way for a flood of legal actions.

telegraph.co.uk / Richard Alleyne / 19 Oct 2012

 

Innocente Marcolini, 60, an Italian businessman, fell ill after using a handset at work for up to six hours every day for 12 years.

 

Now Italy's Supreme Court in Rome has blamed his phone saying there is a "causal link" between his illness and phone use, the Sun (A:  ...of Britain.) has reported.

 

Mr Marcolini said: "This is significant for very many people. I wanted this problem to become public because many people still do not know the risks.

 

"I was on the phone, usually the mobile, for at least five or six hours every day at work.

 

"I wanted it recognised that there was a link between my illness and the use of mobile and cordless phones.

 

"Parents need to know their children are at risk of this illness."  (A:  ...which there is massive proof actually. They keep doing studies, about 4 or 5 a year, showing the same thing.)

 

British scientists have claimed there is insufficient evidence to prove any link to mobiles.

 

But the respected oncologist and professor of environmental mutagenesis Angelo Gino Levis gave evidence for Mr Marcolini — along with neurosurgeon Dr Giuseppe Grasso.

 

They said electromagnetic radiation emitted by mobile and cordless phones can damage cells, making tumours more likely(A:  They interfere with your DNA; they can shatter some of it.)

 

Prof Levis told The Sun: "The court decision is extremely important. It finally officially recognises the link.

 

"It'll open not a road but a motorway to legal actions by victims. We're considering a class action." (A:  ...lawsuit. And that’s really what it takes, you understand. Once they start hitting them in the pocket they have to start looking at it. Otherwise your governments will be happy to go along with it and have you killed off too. It helps to depopulate as well.)

 

Mr Marcolini's tumour was discovered in the trigeminal nerve — close to where the phone touched his head.

 

It is non-cancerous but threatened to kill him as it spread to the carotid artery (A:  In other words, it’s nonmalignant.), the major vessel carrying blood to his brain.

 

His face was left paralysed and he takes daily morphine for pain.

 

Alasdair Philips of Powerwatch, which campaigns for more research on mobile use, said: "This is an interesting case and proves the need for more studies.   (A:  We can get more studies as we’re all getting brain tumors.)

 

"People should limit mobile and cordless use until we know more."

 

The World Health Organisation urged limits on mobile use last year, calling them a Class B carcinogen.

 

But a spokesman for Britain's Health Protection Agency said: "The scientific consensus is that mobile phones do not cause cancer."   (A:  You see, the British Health Protection Agency is on the payroll of the big corporate boys, and they get a lot of grants from them, given to them as well.  And so it goes on and on…)

 

Media lawyer Mark Stephens said the verdict could "open the floodgates" — even though there is no direct obligation on British courts to follow the Italians' lead.

 

He said: "It is possible people will begin legal action here, but I think the chances of success are less. I think they'll join any class action in Italy."   (A:  So good luck to them.)

 

Mobile phones can cause brain tumours, Italian court rules - news.yahoo.com / Oct 19, 2012

 

By the way, they should do the same with these darned… They’re actually more powerful, even worse, the smart meters they’ve stuck in everybody’s homes, without permission. Because that’s much, much more powerful than even your cell phone, and you really get zapped with that. If you’ve got a meter you’ll see it spiking like crazy all throughout your house, many times a day. And that’s deadly stuff. Deadly.

 

Now, I’ve also, I put up a link to a video about a week ago or so, where you saw the Spanish police with these big long batons just pummeling into the people who are peacefully protesting. And acting like vicious, vicious hoods. Of course, it’s the same across the world now. And it really shows you them… There’s even people sitting in cafés and so on, and they were just coming in and cracking them over the heads, all for the hell of it. Because that’s what’s happens when, as I say, the big power structure, that you think is democracy, takes the mask off. It’s always been the same, folks. It’s sheer brute force that makes you obey anything.  And even believe anything, for that matter. It says…

 

Spain Proposes Law Prohibiting Recording And Capturing Of Local Cops In Action

zerohedge.com / Tyler Durden / 10/18/2012

 

If a recently proposed law by the director general of Spanish police, Ignacio Cosidó, is actually enacted, it is likely that live (or replayed) webcasts, photos and any electronic recordings such as those seen recently from the Madrid anti-sovereignty riots may be a thing of the past. But not because they no longer exist: simply because very soon it may be illegal to actually record said events. El Pais reports that "authorities are studying the possibility that the next update to the Public Security Law could include an article prohibiting the recording, processing or circulation on the internet of police officers performing their duties (A:  ...that’s when they bash all your skulls in.), if doing so would endanger them or the operation in which they were engaged." These are the same riot cops who typically wear gas masks, and full riot attire and shields precisely to preserve their identity. But facts matter little when the liquidity tide is going out and all the Ponzi schemes are exposed to have been swimming naked. For now, Spain will be happy to little by little strip its citizens first of their rights to free expression, then all other rights, as it slowly but surely sells the country into Troika slavery. 

 

And remember too, what’s happening there will happen anywhere. And it will come everywhere. Every country is ready for this; they’ve built up internal armies for 30-odd years preparing for this part. See, you’re living a long-term business plan. If you ever understand that you’ll understand the whole thing. Things only can make sense when you understand it that way. And nothing is unforeseen. Every possible move, including the bank crashes, when they would make the bank crashes happen, what they would get out of the bank crashes, meaning social-wise and politically-wise and big changes for the world, it’s all part of it, as these big central banks, private banks get more money given to them. And now every citizen is not just bailing the banks out.  Perpetually you’ll have to give cash to the banks, these big private corps, that are running over, they’re above governments, you understand. They’re to be the government, the future government. I hope you understand this. You have to read your history and then it will make some sense to you.

 

Now, in Texas, it says here…

 

Strange Domes to Line the Texas Coast

in Preparation for Something to Come

theintelhub.com / Shepard Ambellas /  October 15, 2012

 

(A:  And it’s got nice little photographs of these big domes.)

HOUSTON — Disaster-proof domes that can sustain winds in excess of 250 mph will cost taxpayers more than $50 a foot.  (A:  It will be more than that by the time they’re finished.)

 

FEMA has now offered to pick up the tab of at least $50 million dollars (A:  That’s your tax money, folks.), to install disaster shelters in and around Houston that, according to the manufacturer, (ABC Domes based out of Sealy – Division of Golden Sands General Contracting out of Miami) are “almost impenetrable”.

 

The company has been building these type of shelters for decades.

 

The government has also offered to cover 75% of the cost on structures over 20,00 square feet in size. A facility of this size would cost around $1 million.

 

What is interesting is how recent reports vary in nature. Some say that the domes are to protect citizens from hurricanes while others say that FEMA equipment will be held in the domes.  (A:  Actually, that’s also where they put you INTO.  They mentioned that years ago.  In times of, you know, riots and stuff, they put you IN the big domes, and you can’t get out of them.  So I’ll put this link up tonight too.)

 

And with all the massive spraying that’s going on… And the spraying has changed, by the way. They’ve added some more potent stuff to the spray; it spreads faster, for rain, much, much faster. It’s also got a yellowish tinge when you see it getting sprayed in the sky, and then the sky becomes very dark, dark rapidly, and then you smell the stuff coming down. It really stinks; you get a metallic taste in your mouth. And folk are getting asthma attacks all over the place because of it. Of course it’s not happening, according to governments, you see; it’s all under national security and they can’t say anything about it. And they’re killing all the bird life off, and the small animals off, and of course us as well. And it’s the new normal. It’s been here since 1998 across the world. And they’re giving us the weirdest weather.

 

UK experiences 'weirdest' weather

bbc.co.uk / 18 October 2012 / Roger Harrabin

 

The UK has experienced its "weirdest" weather on record in the past few months, scientists say.  (A:  ...you know, experts.)

 

The driest spring for over a century (A:  ...because they can stop rain, you see.) gave way to the wettest recorded April to June in a dramatic turnaround never documented before.

 

The scientists said there was no evidence that the weather changes were a result of Man-made climate change.  (A:  No, they know. They’ve got enough sense, they’re doing it themselves. Look at all the incredible amount of photographs about the spraying coming from Britain and elsewhere.)

 

But experts (A:  ...again...) from three bodies (A:  ...oh, experts...) warned the UK must plan for periodic swings of drought conditions and flooding.

 

You see, because you see they’re manipulating ALL the weather now. I’ll also put up that PDF from the US Air Force, again, it’s manipulating the weather and how they have total weather control, etc. etc.  I’ll put that one up, from the horse’s mouth, at least from the American side of it.

 

Weather as a Force Multiplier:  Owning the Weather in 2025 - http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf

 

So it’s quite amazing as they’ve been doing it. You don’t get rain now, when you watch them spraying and spraying, and then you get these monsoons coming down. That’s part of it too. At other times they can… And they’re using it for weather warfare. You understand, it’s no coincidence that Rothschild bought over the Weather Channel, and at the same time vastly went in a few years before it, into India and others, with his Synerga, the GM company that he owns, the genetically modified company that he owns, and bought up all the farms in India and elsewhere, and started betting on a futures market for food, where it’s going to be drought and where it’s going to be flooded, etc. It’s no coincidence, folk. These guys knew it was coming because they’re all involved in it, including the spraying, because they own the mines that all this crap comes out of that they’re spraying on you. Back with more after this.

 

Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix.  What a matrix it is too, isn’t it? And just mentioning too about all the spraying that’s going on, and how they’ve got your food up on the world’s futures market, and they bet on drought and they bet on flooding.  A great thing for the guys in on the know, isn’t it?  Because they know where they’re going to flood and they know where they’re going to give you drought. This is weather warfare. It’s been well-established. As I say, I’ll put up some articles tonight, from governments themselves, talking about weather warfare. And it’s on; it’s been on on you for quite a long time. What a great way to control everyone through food, though, isn’t it? And great profits as well for the guys who are managing it all.

 

Also tonight I’ll put up a little video, it’s quite amazing…

 

A Conversation with Bernie Marcus - youtube.com / Oct 3, 2012

 

...Marcus (or Marx, I guess that’s where they took the name from), the guy who owns the Home Depot, the guy who helped put under thousands of small businesses and lumberyards and so on. Because they always monopolize, these guys, when they move in; they knock everybody out of business. That’s what they do. They’ve been doing it for a long time, these guys, like centuries and centuries; that’s the standard thing. Then of course they take over and then jack all the prices up when there’s no competition. So he’s bitching about the state of the economy – oh my goodness – and how bad Obama is.  Not that the other guy is any better. But guys like Bernie have been given the word – you see, they’re given the word from their own guys – to go for the other guy; that’s how it works.

 

Bruce Springsteen, of course…

 

Bruce Springsteen campaigns for Obama in Ohio - guardian.co.uk

 

...in a video I’ll put up tonight too.  And he’s all the way there. I wonder if he’ll sing “Born in the USA” for Obama, eh? Or is that kind of a no-no? I don’t know.  Anyway, I’ll put that up tonight too. And this one here…

 

Victoria Grant - youtube.com / May 8, 2012

 

That’s a little girl that came out with a video on Canada’s banking system, so that a 12-year-old can understand it; it’s given by a 12-year-old. It’s very simple. 

 

And also too, ha!  This one here is from The Telegraph, that Members of Parliament – every year this happens – they’re refusing to disclose their expenses now; because now the Members of Parliament are getting all their public expenses from the taxpayer, for their special houses when they have to attend Parliament and all that.  And they buy lots of them, and then they’re renting them to each other. We are paying for all their mortgages, as they’re supposed to be working for the government, for you.  [Alan laughing.]   What a joke. I’ll put that up too. It’s quite interesting.

 

Expenses scandal: MPs block details of new expenses

telegraph.co.uk / 17 Oct 2012

 

And also, Ms. Gillard in Australia, it goes through her history...

 

Gillard gave support for union group's registration

theage.com.au / October 13 2012 / Mark Baker

 

A TRADE union association from which hundreds of thousands of dollars were stolen by a former boyfriend of Prime Minister Julia Gillard was registered only after Ms Gillard vouched for its legitimacy to West Australian authorities. 

 

So she and her boyfriend seem to have diddled a lot of cash out of the union actually, and that’s been known for a while. But that’s why all these laws came out, to try to stop journalists talking about politicians. There’s just too much muck to be raked up here, and they’ve done their best to do it. They’ve actually pulled in one journalist actually for being politically incorrect and he’s been ordered by the government to take journalism training. He’s a radio talkshow host. Quite something isn’t it, eh?  [Alan chuckles.]  VOTE, remember, VOTE, for democracy.  [Alan laughing.] What a joke.

 

Alan Jones ordered to do journalism training - abc.net.au / Oct 23, 2012

 

Also tonight I’ll put up, from the Daily Mail, it’s a story about armed militarized police SWAT teams – I’m not kidding you – that chased a cow.  Armed, you know, with machine guns and everything and all their gear on, chased a cow that went AWOL during a market thing it was on; it jumped and started running through the streets, a young heifer.  And they machine-gunned it down for God’s sake. This is the world you’re living in today, and you think you’ll accept this? Gunning down a cow that was making a break for freedom…  You know. You shouldn’t have armed SWAT teams walking around in any kind of natural society, folks. And you’re all taking it for granted. God help you. God help us all.

 

From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you. 

 

 

Topics of show covered in following links:

 

Western Australia to Sell-Off Publicly-Owned Assets

Canada's Sell-Out to China

Protest---Canada Not for Sale

Scotland and "Engineering the State-Authorized Citizen"

The "Progressive" Liberal-Labour Politicians Behind Jimmy Savile's Paedo Crusade

Nicole Kidman Quits Movie---Real Sexual Intercourse Required

Name and Shame Social Workers U.K.

Mobile Phones Cause Brain Tumours--Court Rules

Mobile Phones Can Cause Brain Tumours Italian Court Rules

Spain May Outlaw Recording of Police Smashing-In Heads of Public

Strange Domes to Line the Texas Coast in Preparation for Something to Come

UK's Weirdest Weather

Owning the Weather--US Air Force

Bernie Marcus of Home Depot Monopoly--Who Put Thousands of Hardware Stores and Lumberyards Out of Business Complains on the Financial State of the Country

Springsteen Campaigns for Obama---"Born in the USA"--eh?

Canadian Banking Explained

Another British MP's Expense Racket.---Blocked Details of New Expenses

Gillard gave Support for Union Group's Registration

Australian Gov. Orders Broadcaster to do Journalism Training

Armed SWAT Teams Chase Terror(ized) Cow in Britain