Nov. 29, 2020 (#1805)
"Cutting Through the Matrix" with Alan
Watt
(Blurb, i.e. Educational Talk)
The Dark-Arts-Deep-State:
"See the Dark-Arts-Deep-State, Effects
Symptomatic
Of a Predatory Beast, Beneath a Cover Democratic,
Comprised of Wise Men, they're Carefully
Selected,
Trained To Move Through Systems, Seldomly
Detected,
The Magic-Money-Managers Keep Their World
Revolving,
Spells on Currencies Prevent Moneys from
Dissolving,
Purchasing Power of Realm Specie is Totally Elastic,
From Silver, Gold, to Paper, now Recycled
Plastic.
They Lead People's Realities, News and
Institutions,
Forever Causing Problems and Heading-up
Solutions,
Scoffing at Religion While Training Your Reliance
On the New-Most-Holy-Order of
Agenda-Driven-Science,
Now they Deploy The Military's Cyber-Warfare
Might,
To Maim Free-Thinking People, Abolishing the
Light,
Psychological Operations unleash Diabolic
Calamity,
Targets the Very Soul of Man, Turns Sane Into Insanity."
© Alan Watt Nov. 29, 2020
*Title & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt -
Nov. 29, 2020 (Exempting Music and Literary Quotes)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDRESS: CTTM
P.O. Box 815
Keene, TX
76059 USA
EMAIL: alanwattcuttingthrough@yahoo.com
(Because of
bombardment of Trojans and Downloader Viruses and Spyware, will be deleting ALL
mail containing attachments.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE OFFICIAL WEBSITES OF
ALAN WATT
cuttingthroughthematrix.com, cuttingthroughthematrix.net,
cuttingthroughthematrix.us, alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca
MIRROR SITE
cuttingthrough.jenkness.com
INTERNATIONAL AND
MULTILINGUAL SITE
alanwattsentientsentinel.eu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting
Through The Matrix on November 29, 2020. What a year, eh? What a year. And it’s not over yet. I can’t believe
it. It’s rushing in, and yet it’s
stretching out at the same time… because of all the, probably our cognitive
dissonance as they call it, as we get so confused with our mind bombed news and
with all the contradictory reports from specialists. The same specialists often too, which give
you really opposing viewpoints on all of their statements. Hhhch, and depending
on how they feel that day I guess, they’ll hammer you into the ground if you
read one of them and you interpret it the wrong way. Because you see, there’s only one way to
interpret it and that’s just believing everything they say. And saying that, I
suppose, you’ll probably get a lot of applause from them and acclaim for just
repeating what they’ve printed for you to read basically and to speak about.
But don’t say anything negative, even when you get reports in from their own
sources [Alan chuckles.] that blow your mind on some of their findings because
it’s not what they want to push across.
You’re living through a big agenda. Massive agenda. A very old one too. I’ll put up tonight one good discussion by
James Delingpole and Patrick Wood of Technocracy. Patrick Wood worked with Anthony Sutton at
one point, they worked together on studying the Trilateral Commission and
putting out their findings on them. But
of course it didn’t start there. Anthony Sutton was way ahead of the game too,
even long before that when he stumbled upon the big organizations with very old
ties to Britain as an example. He tied that in with findings from other
investigators that lived in the late 19th century, early 20th
century, who had already realized there was a power in the world which ran
things, really ran things, you know, above voting and above politics.
Which makes sense actually. Do you really think
when you read even the books put out by the aristocracy, who were also members
of the House of Lords in Britain, and the British Empire, they’re all based on
the same system, lots of books, and committees that they belong to and
organizations they all belong to, when they talked about the coming system,
which they already controlled in their own time, but the system that was to
come, they didn’t ever think that they would give anything away to people who
wanted democracy. Power never gives itself up.
These people were not browbeaten or just weary
through wars and so on. They were at the height of their power at the time and
so they had no intentions of ever giving up their power. They knew that they
could do an awful lot if they got more of the public on their side through
false claims like, we’re here to serve you and let’s use democracy. All you
have to do then is just stop basically the Soviet system taking over, the
Bolsheviks, with a revolution. They decided to give you spokesmen and labor
unions in the West, and they’d supply you with the leaders, who would talk with
all the communistic propaganda terminology and certainly emulate it to an
extent too. But they had no intention of
giving up their real personal private power. Not at all.
So they brought, you came into the 20 century
with two world wars. You’ve got World War I, you already had the Boer War that
really was a continuation and they went straight into World War I pretty well
as Britain was taking over good part of Africa before that. I hate to say Britain. It’s not the British
people. So don’t blame the British
people. They could have used other countries too and use their troops and
finance them and train them just the same way.
It’s really interesting when you really think
about it, how you’re given people to like and hate, or even feel ambivalent
about too. Because you see, and we use these, I hate this, I’ve said this for
years and years, they’ll say, well the British did this, you know. But what
does the British mean, eh? Or the
Scottish, you know? Or the Welsh or the Irish? What does it
really mean? It’s a handy tool for propagandists and the media when they want
to blame people for something, oh the British did this, the British did that. It wouldn’t matter what part of the
plantation of the planet you lived on, if the Masters wanted you to go and
conquer somebody else and made it a prideful thing to put on a uniform and go
and fight, and give you really simple propaganda you’re going off to bring
civilization to the world and so on, but in reality too, they’re telling the
poorer folk, you’ll get some pride in yourself if you wear that uniform, and get little pluses when you come out of the
military and you can get a higher status in society then you would ever get on
your own basically, you see. Every country would do the same thing. That’s the
history of the world.
So those with the understanding of that always
run countries. It’s like Rothschild, Rothschild was awfully good at saying
[Alan chuckles.] what he thought at times.
He said, give me power over the
money of the nation and I care not who rules it’s government, basically.
Because obviously the government would have to come to him to borrow money.
That’s what governments had already done long before he came along when they
created the central banking system. All
governments went cap-in-hand every, maybe four times a year to ask for more
cash, etc., and to decide how much to increase taxation which pays for the
money the government is borrowing. That’s what it’s all about, you know.
It is quite interesting to me to see all that
kind of happening and to see that most folk really don’t understand it even
yet today how it really works. They
forget too, they had a massive long-term war with the Spartans. That changed
Sparta. It’s like Quigley said and others have said too, that wars do more than just create winners and
losers. They alter both sides, or all sides of a
conflict. Your culture gets changed, and often very similarly so in long
term drawn-out wars.
As I say, Britain came out, went into World War
II to fight national socialism in Germany, and came out as a national socialist
country for a while. The irony seems to allude most people, you know. But
that’s really how it is. Because it’s planned that way. Again, you’ve got these
unseen characters with big organizations behind them, these quiet clubs, very
powerful clubs indeed that really run the show. The media are all part of it
because they are employed, they are employed by the folk who belong to these
big clubs, you see, all the journalists are.
But as I say you’ve got to remember too, that
World War I eventually they got the slogan makers in on the act including HG
Wells, you know, who came out with the idea of calling them the Hun, you know,
like a throwback, you see. Because you
must always dehumanize your enemy. It’s
much easier to kill them when you don’t see them as humans, so you put them out
with these derogatory terms and so on.
So you have the Hun, and then for the war in the air, it was Hun in the
sun, beware the Hun in the sun
coming out of the sun with these aircraft.
All that kind of stuff, you see. You can see all, it’s like massive books full
of the propaganda cartoons they used in the newspapers at the time, just
incredible. And World War II was the same. But regardless, yeah, dehumanize the
enemy and use propagandists like HG Wells to dehumanize them. Again too, Wells
was awfully good for his masters, he did, he served them awfully well. At least he got the credit for it, but I’m
sure there was a team behind him.
He also came out with the idea of the white
feather, you know. Because in World War
I initially you just didn’t draft people up right back then. Not initially
anyway. They did want to get national conscription in, you see, it was a goal
of theirs. It was kind of hard to do when you’re pushing this new idea of
democracy. It was new, you understand, this idea of democracy. Most
of the men couldn’t vote any more than the women in Britain at the time for
World War I. They says, well, we’ll give
more of you the vote afterwards and that kind of thing, and better housing. In
other words, something back from all your taxes, we might give you something
back. That was the promise.
But again, they came up with the idea, the war to end all wars. That was a
good one for the youth, you know, all young folk would go for that. Who wouldn’t want to stop wars, eh? And the
idea of utopia, you would have cash in your pockets for a change because it
wouldn’t be getting spent on wars. It was a nice fallacy. And pleasant. And you
were used. Of course you were used, incredibly much so by the
military-industrial complex that reaped in the harvest from all of its
weaponry, and guaranteed payment by the government who was borrowing it all
from the bankers.
So yeah, you’re run by quiet systems, very
quiet systems, that have the big meetings, mind you. When real communication, radio and so on
became prolific then they became even quieter behind the scenes. Because at one
time, you see, there was no problem communicating to each other in their
special magazines or books. And books, they had their own publishing companies
not just for magazines, for themselves, but their own private publishing
companies would publish their world meetings. Like the Royal Institute of
International Affairs before it was even called that, you know. They had their
own publishing companies. Strangely enough too, it’s a small world because they
go way back even to the Rockefellers who often paid for their international
meetings, even long before World War II.
So these private clubs have always been
around. One of the first things they
came up with, the ideas they came up with, was that human resources should not
be given for the rest of the general public to just lay claim to… or members of
the general public to lay claim. It should be held by the responsible
people, and old Rockefeller thought that he was the one to do it, you know.
And then his son David was more open about it too because he was more of a
figurehead for the speeches, world speeches on sustainability and all that kind
of stuff. But they all told the truth from their point of view when they
said that competition is a sin.
That’s where, again, this video I’ll put up with Delingpole and Woods goes
into.
Technocracy And The Great Reset - Patrick Wood and James Delingpole - bitchute.com / 28 Nov 2020
It takes off really in about 1930s when the term Technocracy
took over. You see, that was only part of it, Technocracy. You have to remember
that the group existed as this, it was often called pan-American or
Anglo-American establishment that preexisted the Technocracy group being formed
inside Canada and the States in the 1930s. You’ve got to realize what Technocracy
was. It was about the taking over of resources not just by responsible people
as they call it, the right kind of people, who would limit access to other
people coming in to own different parts of it, they would be very, very
selective. In other words, when you’ve got a gang together it’s much better if
your own gang owns it all, eh, and you don’t let anybody else come along, and
you limit the number in the gang so you can be wealthier and you’ll be more
powerful and so on. That’s sustainable development, you see. That’s where it
comes from. Of course it does.
In the old Anglo-American establishment it was
well understood at the time by many people when they were forming a Federal
Reserve system in the US who was behind it. Colonel Mandel House wrote a book
about it, his own memoirs. He admitted it, that he, well he said himself, he
wanted to take the credit for really
being behind it because he was kind of managing President Wilson, which
he had a kind of contempt for, for being so manageable, hhhch, so easily
manageable I guess, they created the Federal Reserve.
So you’re living through a script basically, a
script do with again a very big establishment, but secretive at the same
time. Big in the sense that it runs the
affairs of nations. You’ll find Carol
Quigley, I’ve mentioned it so many times, he was a member of it, and he was an
historian for the American branch, although he worked with the British branch
as well. He was so enthused by it and
its goals and aims that he published the book , Tragedy and Hope, really
believing at the time he said that it
was time the public got to know what it was about. Because he says,
these people have, these members, which he was all for, had been responsible for world wars, and they were behind almost all
the big changes in history of their day and back into the 19th
century at least and probably before. But he thought their goals were good and he said the only complaint he had was the occasional
misuse or the techniques they use to achieve some of the goals, that’s
the only place he ever differed with them.
However, he let so much out of the bag that the
publishers confiscated the plates, they had the plates for printing at the time
and they broke them and told him that, no more, after the first publication. I
don’t think he had that many sold initially, but luckily enough it got out
there that under, because they had basically written it all off, that many
other publishers could grab the original one and republished them. You can get
copies anywhere. And I’ve checked some
of them, and with the original, and as far as I can see they’re the same. So
you can get them really cheap if you want to go through it.
He let a lot out of the bag of the fact that they
had been behind the movements to take over South Africa and different places.
He went into some of the history of Cecil Rhodes in other books he did. Cecil
Rhodes and Lord Rothschild by the way, that formed the Rhodes Society and
Rhodes foundation. And took over the
gold mines in Africa. And diamond mines
as well. Because again, getting back to what they do, monopoly men, it isn’t
monopoly money that they use, they are monopolizers. They take over resources. The first thing you
do for resources, is you just take over the wealth of a nation. What gives them the wealth? Raw resources,
what is it? Take it over, snuff out the competition by everywhere you can because
it’s war, they see it as a war, you see. It’s quite easy to do that when you’ve
trained yourself to believe you’re doing it for the better, for the good of
all, the greater good, by taking the power out of other people’s hands and
putting it into your own pockets, you see, that’s how they rationalize it.
They cause world wars. They thought that world
wars could achieve change, the planned changes that they had in mind for taking
over the world’s resources. That’s where you are today basically. You’ve been
here for a long time. Sure enough, they
created the Council on Foreign Relations in America, the Harold Pratt
group put the money up for it, high member of it. They based it on Chatham
House rules in England for the Royal Institute of International Affairs,
which used to be called simply the Lord Alfred Milner group and The Kindergarten
group, different names for the same organization. It was so secretive at
one point, and it ran the British Empire.
It placed its members across the globe in all the high positions as
Lieutenant Governor generals and all that kind of thing. They would administer businesses and
resources and taxation over conquered peoples that they were enlightening, you
know, by conquering them and taking the resources. And using the British
taxpayer to fund it all, railroads and troops and things like that.
It’s pretty good when you’ve got a nation like
Britain, this corporation – that’s what it is, it’s a corporation – which you
could always tax the people for its upkeep.
A kind of public/private partnership, only the public don’t know they’re
in it as a partnership, you see, except that you’re signed on to pay all the
debts for the conquest and things and the cost of it all. Nothing’s changed.
Nothing has really changed. They’re very simple cons really. It’s a form of
perception con, that’s really what it is. It’s all down to perception
management and training the public to see it in the way that you want them to
see the system.
Now, the big organization, the big one at the
top, that we know of, I don’t think it really is the highest, I’m sure there’s
one above it, at least one, maybe two or three in fact. But we know about the Royal Institute of
International Affairs. We know about the
Council on Foreign Relations. We know
that they spawned off in Jimmy Carter’s term in office the Trilateral Commission,
and they were drawn again from members of the Council on Foreign Relations and
again, the Royal Institute of International Affairs. They truly, as Patrick
Wood mentions, they truly were modeled after Technocracy, you see. In that, technocrats run the world, people
bypassing politicians. They would
eventually phase out the politicians, that was the idea of Technocracy Inc. in
the 1930s.
After the shambles of World War I, then the Great
Depression, obviously they had to follow it, and World War I didn’t end with
1918. It was still on the go and went right into the Great Depression. Because
now all those who, hhhch, held all the bonds and everything and the bankers
were looting the country, that’s what it was for, now it was time to take over
the wealth of the nation, in the States too, you know. And the land and everything else too in the
process. It was quite an enterprise.
Most folk don’t realize, they always think of
conventional warfare, the first type, the first class A is troop against troop
basically. You don’t realize that economic
warfare is a big part of it regardless of using troops or not. It was very
successful with the Great Depression. It consolidated the power of the
monopolists, you see, who again bought over bankrupted stock and space and
property for pennies on the dollar. That’s how you acquire more and more wealth
and become more and more powerful. Your
institute, if you’re an institution, it’s part of it, like a club with members
and you have your rules that you must follow. You’ve all sworn, you’ve sworn to
all the different rules, just like any secret society which of course in a
sense it is. You work together. You’ve got a command system so you’re
coordinated in whatever you’re doing.
You can’t just jump the gun and do your own thing. You must go along and
take orders from above and obey them whether you understand them or not. That’s imperative in these
organizations. It’s faith-based. Faith that they looked after you. That’s it.
But again, you find getting back, this thread
that you can catch onto, this thread is, that Quigley talked about, the Rhodes
Foundation, and Cecil Rhodes’ great dream, which really wasn’t his. He got it
from another guy, a professor, the idea of this just world, when the right
folk ruled the world, you see, the justness of it all. But to do
that you’d have to take the world over, you understand, you know, so it’s a
little problem there, and to make it just. It isn’t until you really understand
it that they realized that Technocracy didn’t really start in the 1930s at all.
It was much older, at least the idea of, again, the right folk running the
show, efficiently. And again, efficiency is very important with Technocracy,
hm, awfully important.
So as far as I’m concerned, through the 19th
century into the 20th century you had this idea of democracy.
Because you’ve got to get the people going along with you, eh, thinking they’ve
got rights maybe, or maybe they’re going to get rights, or get more rights or
something, as time goes on if you just fight for democracy and do what you’re
told and help the system. As opposed to telling them, no, behind the whole
thing we’ve got Technocracy, or more of a scientifically run system which is efficient,
and we’re only using democracy in the meantime to achieve our goals. That’s
what it is.
Things To Come, HG Wells, he wrote the
book. He was a member of the club too
naturally as a propagandist with a team of writers with him, of course
there were. He even gives you clues of that in some of his books with the
beginnings of them, how he comes in the morning and all this information has
just been laid on his desk by professors and things like that. And it wasn’t
far off the mark. But Things To Come
showed you a system of, it was meant for the people, again, remember when it
was written, eh, it was to make people think, oh no, this is going to go on
forever, more wars and more wars and more wars, and we don’t know when to stop.
When you really look at World War I and there’s
many ways you can look upon it. You can look upon it traditionally, meaning the
authorized version, which still can’t give you real answers as to why it
started, to be honest with you, you know. But they used the same techniques as
they always do, the boys will be home by Christmas. That’s the first lie. Things like that.
Because the first casualty of war is truth naturally. And since those
who rule the world are at war with you all the time, [Alan laughing.] they’re
always telling you lies anyway regardless of the time period, eh. So says
Machiavelli I suppose.
But anyway World War I, and the incredible loss
of life. We can’t really fathom it at the moment today. Again, the newspapers
that would just daily, daily print out the propaganda, our boys at the front. All that kind of lead up to the ideas
for 1948 and George Orwell, you know, World War I and World War II propaganda, our boys at the Malabar front have fought off
the enemy with an extra so many airplanes, so many extra, so many thousand
tanks and yada, yada ya, just reeling off all the munitions in a
materialistic fashion, eh, of weaponry.
So, science is very important to Technocracy and
the idea of it. Right down to how to
reshape the world. Again HG Wells was all for this utopia. He called it A
Modern Utopia at one point in one of his writings. And A New World Order
too, he wrote a book on that as well. He also said a lot of people will die fighting against the New World order, they’ll
die in vain, he said. The reason why it would be that you would die in
vain is because you see, hhhhh, this is the hard part folk can’t really fathom.
Because people are dual minded, your conditioning will always fight with what
you perceive in realism, eh. And I see
it in people, that should know better, falling right back into, oh,
where is the one person that’s going to save us, who can we vote
for? I see them, people who should know
better, hm, after being conned for centuries, you think one person is going to
just turn up out of the blue and be allowed to stand up for you? Even if he was
real? [Alan chuckles.] Which is doubtful.
But no. People fight against their own
conditioning, that’s really what it is, and what they’ve been taught, that
they’re still free. No, you’re not really free. HG Wells as I say, shows you or
tries to get it through your head in Things To Come and A Modern
Utopia and The New World Order basically, as he termed it as
well. As he said, thousands will fight against it, or many will
die in vain basically. Why did they know that? Is this the first
kind of struggle for freedom that you couldn’t win, you see? What’s he telling
you here? They’ll die in vain…? What he’s trying to tell you is, you’ve all
been conditioned to believe reality by the people who already own you, they’ve
conquered you.
I gave this talk in the late 90s on a radio
show. I said, you grow up thinking
you’ve got, that you’re free simply because you don’t walk into bars, that
don’t suddenly appear there, you know, normally wherever you’re going. Until they end up in some kind of martial law
situation and suddenly, you’re walking along the same roads and the same
country lanes or whatever it happens to be, and bang, the bar has just come up
in front of your face, just like that, boom, that’s it! You’ve never seen them
before, because you see, you’re allowed a certain amount of freedom to get
the perception that you’re free. A certain amount. But when the big boys
and gals wants to let you know, they press the button, up comes the bars very
quickly.
But also, HG Wells knew that your conditioning,
because they make you think you’re free, will be your worst enemy when you’re
trying to be free. So in the 90s I said, you know, you’re taught and
trained from childhood that your country, because again Britain was
socialistic, eh, to win the people over they give you socialism at times, and
also to train you to be obedient to government agencies as they proliferate,
you see. And you say, well there are
departments of this if I ever need welfare, I can just get it, if I hit hard
times. There’s unemployment I can use that will give me cash if I get laid off.
And you’ve got all these complaints departments, official complaints
departments, they can go and put an order, a complaint to basically, and
they’ll jump into action and deal with it on my behalf. That’s what you think,
you see. Even today, if I get sick, I can go to hospital. But you’re forgetting that you may be, if
you’re a certain age or whatever, they’ve already demoted you before you walk
in the doors by your age and everything else [Alan chuckles.] and if they’re
even going to spend money, waste money, your money, mind you, are they going to
waste it on you in treating you or just let you die, you know? Or even help you
die now as they do in Canada.
Still you take a lot for granted until you need
it. As I say, eventually it's like when things happen and you need those tools
that are out there to help you, that you're paying for all your life, right,
it's like okay, I'll take a pick, you know, like a pickax, you know, or spade
or something. Then you go to dig with
it. You find all these tools that they've given you are made of rubber, so that
pickax bounces off the road when you whack it, and so on. I'm showing you that
the tools are fake, they're not there for you at all, and they're not meant to
work for you. That's how it really is. That's
just the start of it, isn't it.
So you see, the New World order that HG Wells was
talking about, who are you going to complain to? When you see those who rule,
they ARE your order that you have, they run your whole system, the whole
system, they run the complaints department, everything, they run it all. You've
been deceived, brainwashed to believe that you're free. You don't realize, no,
you're conquered. Technically conquered. It's the best form of being conquered
because who do you fight when you're conquered? It's like everybody has been
appointed by somebody into a position of power over you, but you’re taught that
it's just natural and that they just appeared out of nowhere and you know,
little committees in your towns appoint them.
Really? Who owns them? And who owns your town?
That's it. That's what you're living in. You're living in Fantasia in a sense
inside your own head. So if you're fighting this, that's what HG Wells was
doing, he's talking about this way at the beginning of the 20th century, eh, if you're fighting the New World Order,
he says, many will die in vain. But he's not telling you the rest of it. The
rest of the story is, you see, the whole system is theirs. They're not taking over, you see, they took over
a long time ago. Your
politicians are all preselected to be front men and women, and they know that.
Quigley said that too in his book Tragedy and Hope he mentions, yeah,
there is a group and has been a group that blah blah blah, and he goes into it.
He said that it has existed for, that
the heads of parties, political parties, all parties, eh, are members of the
same organization. He says, they have been for at least the last, I
think it was 60 years, maybe
further back. No, he wrote his book in the 1960s. We know from the British side
that it preexisted that by at least, well probably going back into the 1880s
maybe.
Still we're living through a system that is
clever enough to give you a fake version of reality, so that you just don't
collapse mentally and think, oh that's okay and things will get better, because
we're optimists. And media, their media will tell you, things will get
better, don't worry. Or, the war
will end soon, eh. Or, the economy will take an upturn, you know, it
will be good again. All that stuff that they play with you with.
But you've had the greatest example in the States
this last while with Trump getting in, you know. Regardless of who he is,
really, but there's no doubt about it, certain forces were not happy with it at
all, from the beginning obviously. He couldn't get any cooperation, regardless
if the guy is right or wrong with what he's doing, he couldn't get any cooperation
on anything he was doing pretty well. Almost anything he was doing. He couldn't
get it.
Then we, for the 2020 we've had this coordinated
effort, and I said that months and months and months ago that I thought that
China and the States and the rest of the world had all agreed to come on board
with this Covid thing before we even heard of it. They would do the drama, I
even mentioned that, how they would fall down in the streets and stuff. Why
would they, why would China, if they don't want you to see anything, you will
NOT see it, it won't get published and put on the net somewhere for you to see.
But we saw the terrifying images of these big dump trucks spraying stuff out
into the, down through the streets, hundreds of feet into the air. Horrifying stuff,
eh? Hmmmmmmmmmmmm. Yeah. To terrify the West. To get us
ready for it. To get us ready for terror, you see. So it had to be a collusion
with them. Of course it was. Yes, it was. All the countries are working
together.
Don't forget, I used to give the talks about the
CFR and the bigwigs themselves who always said in their speeches that China was the model state for the world to
emulate. What part of that don't you understand? And people say, well we're not Chinese, you know,
they're communist and... They get tied up with terminology. China is a technocratic state. It was set up by outsiders [Alan chuckles.]
who were in China. The first thing they
needed was massive cash and those who could understand and manage cash and debt
and credit and the conology of money, you know. The West provided them with
that and funded them into existence with the free trade agreements and the GATT
treaty and so on.
It's just astonishing, people don't even know,
even folks who live through it all don't even know. That suddenly everything was made in China.
Suddenly their factories were going over, and it was in the papers, shipped
overseas. Wholesale, the factories dismantled and put over there somehow, all
the tooling, everything. They were
getting paid to do it by your tax money. Your own government, what you think
are your governments are not yours, did it all and made it happen. Made it so, as they say. And you're still
paying for it. And millions of folk lost their jobs.
I can remember a place in Ontario alone, one of
the towns there, there was a factory town, one factory after another, within a
span of two or three years went under. Bom-bom, like dominoes. And folk
applying for jobs, and being there for two or three weeks, and then that would
close. One after the other. They were terrified, these people, families and
home mortgages, the whole thing. All planned that way, by the politicians that
signed us all onto it under the guise of free trade.
The group that drafted up all the agreements for
free trade came out on television eventually in 2005 in Canada as the Council
on Foreign Relations and quite happily told us all that they had drafted up the
free-trade for the Americas. Nobody
votes for these characters. But they've got their members all through politics
and civil service positions, media, you know, the whole thing. They also
proudly boasted that they'd done a similar thing for the European Union. And
they had. [Alan chuckles.] Small world, eh, isn't it? The same thing for China,
the China deal. And more to come, the TransPacific Partnerships and so on. I've got books that they wrote from the 1920s
and 30s where they go through a European Union long before the public heard
about anything like that, or free-trade deal, or economic meeting group or
whatever as they were initially called in Europe by the same groups, by their
own publications. You're living through a script.
Now it's time to go into real efficiency and do
away with, they've used democracy. In
fact, they've used your tax money to force this totalitarian system across the
planet, by helping people, we're here to help you. Hhhch.
Now, set up a system just like ours, we’ll appoint the people in charge,
and we can't let folk just come in and start their own businesses, we’ll take
over the resources and manage it responsibly. Oh by the way, there's too many
of you, etc. We'll supply the education for that and the facilities to reduce
the population and keep it to a lower figure. I mean, this is how it's done.
And the hardest folk to get through to are the
more brainwashed folk in the West because they really think that they had, that
they lived in a free society. They still
do. As I say, in 2020 you had get-rid-of-Trump on the go, the mantra, you had
riots in streets, color revolutions that were run by the military by the way,
military agencies, or agencies attached to the military, often special forces
by the way in some of them. And I really
mean that, you know. And they put in the leaders, etc., who are
well-funded. The followers are all
expendable. They're useful, that's all.
So they're burning down streets and so on,
instances, and homes across the US, all in the one year, along with Covid, this
Covid, oh suddenly it just came out of China they said you know, now they're
trying to deny it even came out of there and yada, yada ya. Now the whole world
has to change because of Covid. And that's happening, folks are getting locked
down, but rioters and protesters are allowed to riot and protest. And the cops stand back and do nothing. And
so does government. That doesn't happen by itself all in the same year,
folks.
Then you have an election. And you know that with
Antifa and Black Lives Matter, and the riots and protests and all the rest of
it and the burnings, and lootings, hhhch, that more folk swung that would never
have swung even, to Trump, way more, because they didn't want a communist, what
they thought, what they saw or perceived as a communist uprising, that's what
they thought it was taking over. So they weren't going to vote for the liberal
or left wing. No way.
So it doesn't matter that everything is fudged,
all the voting things were fudged. It didn't matter at all. And it never will.
Because the establishment at the top want it this way. The same
establishment that was there before want it this way. Of course it is.
It's managed. The deep state, the CIA, alternate parallel government say, come
up with what you want. Again, the CFR group who called themselves the
establishment by the way because they’re put into all prominent
positions. But folk want to believe that
suddenly, no, it's just a little hiccup in time, that's what we’re noticing on
the graph here, that's our present time space, this little hiccup, we’ll go
back to...
Even though there is no, nothing going to point
to, they've all said the opposite, you're
not going into any kind of normalicy, the old normalicy again, things will never be the same again.
Fauci said back in, what, about March? [Alan
chuckles.] How would he know? Because he belongs to the same CIA club in
his position that manages bacterial and viral warfare and so on. Of course it
is. He knows the big club wants to use this across the world for the great
reset, the technocratic system that Mr. Patrick Wood and Delingpole were
talking about in the video.
It's the same system as I say that was on the go
long before the Trilaterals came along in Jimmy Carter's time. And how
technocrats can be put into any position in advance. They've all sworn
allegiance to the club that selected them to even go into politics in the first
place. Guaranteed to get put in, by the way, as Prime Ministers, and then
Deputy Prime Ministers and Governors, etc. Across the world. The British Empire
is a good example. Again, this corporation, eh?
It's a good example because New Zealand and
Australia and a part of India too, where they’re also having riots in India.
They're trying to keep that out of the media too. But folk are fighting back
for sure. But Australia and New Zealand,
you can see all their leaders suddenly, these Democratic leaders suddenly
are all complete stern technocrats.
We can’t have freedom and democracy during this period so that’s it, it's
gone, it’s vanished, and it’s emergency powers.
Which is martial law, you know, and do what you're told and so on. But they're
all members of the club, that's how they were selected long ago.
If you ever look at how people, look at the
resumes of folk who end up in politics. They generally are of the same
ilk. Men and women in them. They don't
want to work for a living. I mean, work, really work. They might have jobs but
they're not, I don't call it work, you know. They go into charitable agencies
and committees, on the boards and committees, not to work inside them and do
the actual work but they join all these different things on the boards, you
see. You'll find that if there's
anything, for instance a good example is drugs. In any organization in your
community is to do with drugs, to fight the war on drugs or something, and is a
charitable institution, and it will be registered as a charitable institution,
that's where folk can go to become politicians. You start off there.
And get a few other ones on the go too. You come in with your little briefcase and so
on and you all wear little business suits, men and women. There's always an
older guy at the end of the table who everyone knows, he just reeks of
authority. The congenial authority, he'll
make you feel at home, but you know that he's the boss. Even though this is a panel supposedly to
decide on dispensing money and aide or whatever it happens to be to do with
drugs or any other private charitable institution, you see. It's always to help
people.
But he is the selector, he selects people to go
up. He's the one who will write their resumes, you know, like a good report
card, and steer them off into the right direction. If they're the right stuff, you see. He'll give them, well you should join this
club now, you know, this other group. That's how you get up the ladder, one
step, step-by-step. You're being initiated
and tested the whole way to see if you've got the right stuff, of keeping your
mouth shut. They'll even give you little
setups to see if you will keep your mouth shut. You're tested.
These are the people who are put forward for
politics, you see. In fact, you don't, you didn't have any political ambitions
at all, or convictions I should say, left or right. They'll create a role for
you. You'll be a left-wing or a right-wing or a moderate or whatever it is, they'll
create it for you. You're pretty well an actor. But you'll always know that
you've got bosses above prime ministers and presidents. And when the word's
given, you'll all swing in and say exactly the same things, at the right time,
and at the same time. Like total lockdown, etc. That's how it's done.
They've all sworn to obey. All of them. You can
look at the media for goodness sake with the same phrases. Why have 500 different TV channels across the
States, or more, I don't know how many they've got, where they all say the same
things, the same statements, same line for line everything, verbatim, on the
same topics? Which proves there is no independence in any of them.
So yeah, I've got some old books too, fascinating
ones from the 19th century as well when they talk, you know, the aristocracy
talk about their meetings, in the clubs, and they are actually meetings in
their clubs, and who they meet. I saw Randolph today, and things like
that, and Winston, young Winston, you know, and all that kind of stuff, at
the club. They're sitting having
their little drinks and cigars, as zeppelin bombers, the old zeppelins of World
War I were dropping the occasional bomb and chatting about it. Things like
that. It's quite fascinating to get into the mind, and the fact that Winston in
one of the books commented on this ridiculous, hhhch, phantasm of a thing called democracy that they kept pushing in
Britain at the time. During world
war, and it's true, they were pushing it.
We'll get rights for, if you go off and fight and die for the
corporation, we’ll give you, you know, which is really handy getting rights
once you're dead, eh, then yeah, you'll get rights afterwards and so on. That's
the reality of it. That's how things really were. And still are to a good
extent too.
But again getting back to the point of it, this
is not a new thing, it's just the later phase as they call it, Technocracy. Technocracy,
with Jimmy Carter promoting them all, mainly, most of them actually in his
cabinet or in his office were technocrats for the first time. We see it now. They appoint them to run countries now when a
Prime Minister or something collapses like Italy or France or somewhere or
Spain. They'll occasionally appoint a technocrat, they actually say it in the
papers, a technocrat from their central bank and put them in as prime
minister. They mean, unelected, you
see. That's Technocracy at work. That
happened a few years ago.
But most folk again, they still go back to
falling in for the voting. This is our
man or woman, this is, this person speaks for me. [Alan laughing.] There you go. As I say, all
you had really in the last four years in the States, and the world has had, was
a bit of a breather, a temporary respite. Which was abused and missed use
because most folk couldn't see what was coming. In fact, they missed the point
in it. The one thing that perhaps Trump did, at least one thing, I don't know
if he, hhhch, did an awful lot. But he pulled the US out of the Paris Accord with
the climate change stuff. Which was the whole agenda for sustainability under
the guise of using the climate. You see? Now they’re using Covid for the great
reset. Hm.
But sustainability was always the idea. Too many
folk causing problems and there's too many people, we've got to start culling
the population and bringing it down, etc., you see. And totally coupled of course with Technocracy,
which was energy units. And you are a human being, you are an energy unit, you
consume energy too. You've seen the
publications, if you bothered to look at them from the Paris treaty accord and
so on, the climate accord, and the Conference of Parties, where they talk about
this quite openly. That yeah, each person born will, that little baby will
consume X amount of energy units, meaning money and resources, etc., they had
us all put down to energy units, in the first six months of its life just
keeping it alive.
They're quite blatant about it all but folk
don't like to hear unpleasant things, so they turn their head away. They've
been taught not to look at the unpleasant. That's
what a good part of the New Age was about. All you saw in the New Age movement,
avoid anybody that's negative.
Well, what do you mean by negative?
Well, makes you feel unpleasant. Okay, so topics that are unpleasant
should be avoided. Absolutely, think of the good things. Think of the things
you want, and they'll just come your way if you think properly in the magical
formula about it, and you get what you want. What YOU want, you see, it's all
about what you want and personal power for yourself. But yeah, don't look at
anything that's negative.
So you saw the coming free trade with China and
the money that was your money, tax money that was going to fund all the
movements for businesses and corporations and factories over to China, from the
West. The whole West, it was like an armada of goodbye factories and
everything. Literally. And we paid for it with our tax money. Through the free
trade agreement, that wonderful free-trade agreement. And they gave China the most favored nation trading status. Meaning, they didn't have to pay any taxes
for 15 years, it could pollute like crazy. But it could still apply
taxes to any imported goods coming into China.
But your stuff, you'd have to buy it from China and don't penalize them
at all for taxes as import duties. Wonderful.
And at the end of 15 years if any of the corporations that were over there
making things in China said that they hadn't made the proper profits that they
expected to make in that time, because of the move, then they could extend the
free taxes and that for another 15 years. There's 30 years of free taxes and so
on. Not bad, eh?
And we're still giving out free-trade. Because
you see, it was planned a long time ago by the same club who boasted about it,
as I said, in 2005. But they were also behind it in the 1930s. Talking about the same deal that's now the
TransPacific Partnership. And they had the TransAsia Partnership and so
on. From their books in the 20s and 30s.
But facts don't matter to most folk, do they?
They still prefer to believe that we're fighting a battle by voting, day by day
and year by year, and they're eventually, the person in the white hat will come
along and say vote for me, I going to fix it, and you'll all go and fall into
the same trap again. But as I say, you had four years at least of a bit of a
reprieve. Trump knew that, and I read
the articles even before Trump got in, that Canada and the States, state by
state to the provinces have done combined agreements on implementing all the
free-trade measures regardless of national interest and national policy. We've
been doing it all along, you see, implementing all the climate change
agreements, whether he went to the meetings or not. [Alan laughing.]
Because they're appointing the same people.
That's what I'm saying, this monster, this monster of an organization already
has placed all of its people in the right positions of power. Always has, you
see. They are selected, preselected as
Quigley said. Just like all the Ministers for Health in all the Western
countries, and Australia, they're all members of the same club with the WHO,
etc. Some of them even have, have been, are still board members of the WHO,
kind of dual interest, eh. Well, I don't
vote for the WHO either. Do you? Np.
Technocracy again was to be efficient. Margaret
Thatcher joined it eventually. When she retired, she talked about it. She says I now belong to a group where we get things
done. We’re not responsible to the public for votes. We don't have to persuade
the public to go along with that, we just do it quietly behind the scenes. And she says, I as a former prime minister know other prime ministers and former
prime minister's, current and retired, and top civil servants across the world
and presidents and so on, and ex-presidents, and we get the job done.
She's talking about the Trilateral Commission. Not responsible to the people,
you see.
The things that HG Wells showed you in Things
To Come, in the movie version they put a bit of it in there too, where the descendants
of the technocrats who took over the system, in fact there was the same actors
they used for generations later, but the descendants, hhhch, they showed you
were still going on into the future regardless of the little people they left
behind down at the bottom. But still the same descendants of all the leaders,
which shows you eugenics there too, obviously. Superior groups, you see, who
would go off into space and conquer the stars and leave all the useless folk
down below to do paintings, you see, and sculptures because they have nothing
else to do except play because everything is made by machines, you see.
Technocracy shows up in the great reset, same
thing. It’s all there isn't it? Old, old
plan, you see, very old plan. Before, as
I say, they used to believe that world
wars were necessary to get the countries to their knees, as HG Wells
said, and give up their national
sovereignty and allow themselves to be governed and ruled by the proper people
who would manage the resources and all that. M-hm.
Old agenda. It's monotonous to me. It's maybe monotonous to you
too. But there we are with it. It's a never-ending
agenda. The never-ending story I used to call it. It's like chapters in a book, but the book goes
on forever because it's the same controllers for centuries really.
Remember too, cuttingthroughthematrix.com.
Send bucks my way, hopefully, and I can keep ticking along here, and maybe even
expand in some small way perhaps. Because we're on a real roller coaster now,
we're really going into it now. It's on
steroids obviously. You can smell it coming down the pike, this long sought
after stage of their dream, you know.
It's not the whole dream, it's a big stage towards it though. The whole stage of this part of the dream won't
be finished until the end of this century. Again, Agenda 21, the agenda for the
whole of the 21st century is split up into sections, like 2030 and so on. Each
goalpost like 2030 is what they want to have achieved by that date, then it's
on to the next 15 years and the next 15. And they want to have the whole of Agenda
21 finished at the end of the century.
By that time they're talking about a whole different
society, a whole different, a much reduced population too, worldwide, eh, going
towards their goal of sustainability. Meaning massive reduction of population.
They don't want people around that have no real purpose, or, they have no
purpose for you. Hhhch.
So again send a few bucks my way @cuttingthroughthematrix.com.
PayPal is fine. Cash is fine. A personal
check is fine. Some people can even send international postal money orders from
their countries to Canada, but not from the States now, they stopped that from
the States. Even small bank checks you can get done at the bank. Or Money Gram. We'll see how well that goes
as time goes on. Because big changes are happening so fast now. Free speech is
really out the window. Really out the window. It truly is. You know. When they
bring in the military cyber war agencies and attack the people, like I
mentioned last week and the week before, they've declared war on their own peoples. In the newspaper, it's published
articles.
So cuttingthroughthematrix.com. Make a
list of the sites I have because if one goes down hopefully the other ones,
there's always one up there. If you don't hear me on the Sunday night / Monday morning,
then try the other sites. Make a list of them for your own benefit.
Because we're truly going through momentous times
in history. It's bad enough having world war and watching mass slaughter across
countries, and monuments getting put up in towns and cities and hamlets across
the world to all the folk who got slaughtered, you know. All for the greater
good, you know. It was for the war to
end all wars, another HG Wells big lie. And his white feather as I said before,
I'll just finish that, I should have finished that. He said how to get the guys
to go off and fight in this war, world war. You’d think HG Wells would be a
pacifist. No, he was all for the agenda. He was selected. He says, if we get the women to shame their fiancés or
their husbands by wearing a white feather in their hat in public in the
streets, that would make people point, it could make the guilt complex, so
shame, shame, shame them, and the men would go fight.
The dirty tricks that they played, eh! Never ending. Never ending. It doesn't stop,
does it? The same characters that used World War I for Things to Come,
hhhch, oh, we can't go on like this, look at the chaos and slaughter,
and perpetual war, though it would continue after it, eh, so we need a
really ruling caste, a ruling elite to rule the world properly. The
Freemasonry of the Air, he called it in his book, a secret society all sworn to be a brotherhood of the air,
eh, hm. I tell ya. That's what he said, yeah, many
will fight in the world order, and they'll fight and die in vain.
Because you see it's the whole system. It's the whole system. It never was for
the people. Hhhch. It never was at
all. Np.
Our indoctrinated version of history, the
authorized versions, they make you think the world is always fighting itself through
different factions, just fighting and wanting to dominate and so on, and that
there are clear lines between different kind of groups and parties and
associations and nations. But it's nothing like that at all when it comes to
the big organizations that run the world. Just pondering through their own
books with their international meetings, just for the Royal Institute of
International Affairs itself, and all of its affiliates too that attend, you
know, they have international affairs groups for India and all the Commonwealth
countries, still today, and other countries now as well. They brought the US in with the Council on
Foreign Relations long ago too. Now they
have one as well that was set up for the politicians and the higher elite, the
commission areas in the European Union. The same groups, all the same across
the whole planet. And the Asia-Pacific
group for the Far East as well including Australia.
So it's a vastly different world than the way
you're trained to believe. That it's always a, we need world government because
we're always fighting each other. But when you look at the attendees of the
meetings, the world meetings that they have for the Royal Institute of
International Affairs in the 1930s, as an example, they have all kinds of
people as members. Communists. Revolutionaries. They had members in southern
Ireland who were revolutionaries too.
Full members in those meetings in the 1930s. They already had chapters on free trade with “most
favored nation trading status" categories in them. The same organization
that all the way down through 1960s, 70s and 80s brought you the European
Union. And brought you the free-trade agreements for the Americas. And for NAFTA, the USMCA I think they call it
now, same agreement really. The same group behind it all.
Some of them you know their names of, the people
who attend the meetings because some of them are your presidents and prime
ministers, other ones are high civil servants.
Other ones are members of your central banking system. It's one big
club, you see. They have specialists in all different areas. They actually say
that too. And all the other
international organizations that they own, and Institutes of International Affairs. Lots of them. They couldn't use the ‘Royal’
title in some of the countries naturally because they were not members of the
British Commonwealth.
So it's an ongoing process with again the idea of
wars which we can find out by Quigley's other books on South Africa, the Boer War,
who was behind it to make it all happen to grab the resources. And how the
group that he belonged to also studied intensely the Russian or Bolshevik
revolution. Studied it. That's why, you
see, they have all members, all kinds of members in their organization. Quigley
said the same thing, we have, we don't
care if they're communists or dictators or whatever, they'll take anybody on
board, if they're useful, you see.
But for the people that they rule over, they
train you to believe that everybody's definitely, we all think this way in this
nation, and we all think of these are our enemies over there in that nation.
That's the historical version that’s drummed into you. But in reality, it's vastly, as Quigley says,
we don't care what they are,
hhhch, they bring them in, eh.
And they all have their drinkie-poos together after these big meetings and
lunches, and very congenial and jovial, you see. That's how it's done.
From an organization that, it says pragmatic,
it's very, it does things out of necessity, to get things done.
All the eggs you break, like Rockefeller said, you know, you can't make an omelette without breaking
the eggs. Well, all the fallout
and chaos and unemployment that's caused, or even wars and so on, it's just
unfortunate, that's the shells that are all broken from the eggs. And you can't
make the omelette any other way, you see. So they can always rationalize anything
that's done.
For the greater good, that's
all through their books, the greater good, yeah. And, the good life. They
had all these code terms and buzzwords and phrases. The good life, the one that Bertrand
Russell always used because he was a member of it too of course. But yeah, it's
to bring the good life to the people. But really study Bertrand
Russell's ideas, he didn't believe that it was a matter of distributing more
goods to the poorer folk. Or even to the
folk in the working class in Britain either, who were still poor. It was more
of a careful, again, is Technocracy is what it’s called today.
Technocracy is the system to be brought in on
behalf of the Royal Institute of International Affairs / Council on Foreign
Relations and the Asian-Pacific group of course and so on as well. It's all the
same bunch bringing in the same agenda. And of course the proper people
will decide how you distribute the goods and redistribute the wealth of the
general public. [Alan chuckles.] We’re doing that already through the whole
exercise of Covid. Because obviously with all this fake money being flakily
created by the fake bankers, but how can you be a real banker if there's no
real tangible thing to point to? You're
not transferring gold or silver across bank to bank and so on. It’s all blips on
computer screens, it’s created on the spot basically. So you don't really need
a banker who really carefully meticulously looks at debt and profit and so on,
if it's not backed by anything.
But it's a matter of control, that's, there's no
doubt about that. It's a better form of
control management of the general populace. Because it decides, even in
population control, if you make it almost impossible to afford children
then fewer folk will have children. Or if the ones that do have them,
they haven’t got the cash, and they’re not getting subsidized to have the child
and take care of the child, then the child is probably going to get sick and
die, and maybe their parents will die as well, because they can’t afford the
proper nutrition, etc, or heat in the winter and all these things. This is
stuff that Malthus talked about and other ones after him too talked about, and
all the top economists that belong to the group I’m talking about now have
often brought up that there’s many ways to control population, economic
factors being one of them.
So we’re going through a long-term agenda and of
course it’s now married with Technocracy, which is technocrats basically, a technocrat
system using technology to manage the general population on a global
scale. You’ll find it written in a lot
of nonfiction books, and fiction as well. It’s through a lot of the movies that
you watch in the sci-fi movies, all these little predictive programming type
implants that get put into your mind through watching them. Well yeah… It starts off as a
possibility. Then you start to see it
becomes a reality. Then eventually it’s
pushed as a necessity, for your own good and for safety and for
antiterrorism reasons you’ve all got to get chipped or at the very least
monitored on every move that you make using your cell phone or whatever it
happens to be at the time. But the fact is you’re always programed for what’s
to come.
And a lot of folk like it, you know. Especially if you’re brought up with
watching the Sci-Fi’s and believing it, and say, oh that’s fantastic, that’s a
great thing, I wouldn’t mind living in a world like that. Of course you
don’t realize you’re getting programed to do something similar, but not quite the same.
It won’t be a wonderful utopia, that’s for sure. But you certainly will be
monitored and managed with your social credit score. The same as China. You
know, China is, it’s the model state we’ve all to copy. I’ve got articles going
back to the 1970s before they really buildup China by using our money, hhhch,
and creating the modern China, talking about this could be a model state.
Because the people are so obedient in China, you see. They’re more used to dictatorial feudal
systems of management. Feudalism and socialism too. Ancient China tried all kinds of government
systems to manage the people and meticulously studied it all of course, and its
efficacy, etc. to compare them all. Today you have the outcome of it all.
Again, you’ve got the leaders of the world today,
the communist leaders, again, all members of the same international club, they
don’t discriminate on your point of view. If you’re handy and you believe in
totalitarianism, then they’ll bring you in. For democratic countries they’ll
give you kind faces that say things in a much more pleasant way, but want the
same thing, you see. They want international duty, you have an international
duty to your fellow man and woman, and you’ll be trained to have that. It’s
like China, that’s what China’s based on, you see. So that’s why, you’re going to copy China, and
you’ll all be happy doing it, and you’ll live with a lot less, like Klaus
Schwab said.
Mr. Schwab.
And who appointed him? The same club basically, a different branch you
see, specialized branch, that’s what it is. He speaks for the monied interests
that manage the world. Because it’s a
big part of the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Don’t forget, the
Royal Institute of International Affairs came out of the Rhodes Foundation with
Cecil Rhodes and Lord Rothschild, hm, then merged with the Lord Alfred Milner
group, that also was getting funded by the same financiers in the
British Empire, to create the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Long-term planning, eh?
And when you really have these massive committees
with massive think tanks, that work 24 hours a day at times, and literally have
used generations of people, hiring and retiring and hiring and retiring, they
always achieve their goals. Why can’t they? Because you see, no ordinary
middle-class businessmen can imagine, oh, I’ll still be working down the way
through my work, this company here will be going full steam ahead in two
hundred years time. You couldn’t imagine that. But with private foundations,
you see, with all that money, and their incredible vested interests, and all
the monopoly, the monopolization of the world’s wealth and resources that they
do, and then they sink it in, and they call themselves charitable foundations,
and reinvest it for themselves. And pay themselves incredible salaries off it
too, mind you, which they, since they’ve written up all the laws on it, it’s
all quite legal. So yeah, they can give
their workers at the top billions of dollars a year, just like the bankers do
too.
Many of the top ones get paid awfully well. And
the big think tanks that they have, they’re really like private civil servants,
like whole corporate, whole battalions of them sitting there doing their
work, each working on precise planning of the future in their own specialized
areas. That’s how it’s done. Too much for the average person to imagine
because you don’t hear that coming out of the mouths of politicians. Because you see, their job is not to bring
you into the big secret. That you’re meant to just fall in line… Well this guy
in Toronto there, that Ford guy, he’s annoyed that folk are protesting his
lockdowns, that’s how folk see things, you know. You’re trained to see the
person and the Punch and Judy show that you throw tomatoes at. That’s what
their job is. They don’t plan on this stuff. They don’t plan.
Look at the organization that turned, from the
start, on Trump, President Trump when he got in. It was like, we’re not
going to work for this guy. Like, [Alan chuckles.] the whole government, we’re
not going to work for this guy.
You’re, what on earth is this? what is this real thing of
government? Because after all, if the
people really voted him in, they’re supposed to jump to it and do what they’re
told and get on with it. But nope. Fought, fought, fought the whole time in
office. As I say, there’s no doubt, there is no doubt overwhelmingly that,
never mind the fraud voters, fraud that they’re claiming and so on. But the
fact is, the whole antics of Black Lives Matter and the Antifa burnings and so
on, and all the lootings that we saw as well, well-paid, as I say, these were
all paid and funded by the so-called deep state, the big boys. Which is the real system that runs the world.
That’s your evidence.
But there’s no doubt about it, it made more and
more folk vote for Trump regardless. Because who would vote in a communist
government? to sit there and watch communists go to work? That’s the impression
that was put over to the people at least. Even though, as I say, the leaders of
these groups were all professionals. Many of them had worked across the world
in other color revolutions on behalf of the CIA. But yeah, and all the fake
voting and so on.
I don’t know if you noticed that one, some, more
of the 1%, I’ll call it 1% in Egypt, of another dynasty they found, over 100
mummies they found, they have them on display some of them, and there’s more
and more to come. Have you read that recently? It was about two weeks ago in
the papers, eh. At the time I thought, you know, and it sure is funny, if you
look up the names of these mummies, they all voted for Biden, I guarantee
they’ll be on the list. But that’s how
farcical it all is. It’s so farcical.
We all know it. We all know that the real rulers
wanted Biden in this time, you see. And sure enough, they’re even making statements
like, we’re back on course now with the climate agenda and Paris accord and
this, that and the other, you see. And
the same old, let’s bash Russia, let’s get the war going with Russia, the same
kind of stuff. And again, we’ve got the war drums going for parts of the Middle
East and so on. So they mean it, they’re
back on course. That’s why they were really upset with Trump. If Trump had just
gone to war with the rest of the list that was mentioned by the PNAC group that
General Wesley Clark talked about, if he had just gone to war with them, you
wouldn’t have had any of these problems on the go, I think. Would you?
Because this agenda run by the big organization
I’m mentioning here gets upset when its plans and timetables get upset
too. Trump was supposed to finish off
Syria, you know. We had the whole thing from Bush Junior and the PNAC group and
all the wars that they brought the States into. The whole list was made public,
as I said, what was on the list to be taken out of countries? Then when they couldn’t just go all the way
and get rid of Syria, then they had all these proxy armies that they funded, by
the West. We paid for it all, our tax money paid for it all. Rather than get
American boots on the ground and other European countries, they got their proxy
armies.
I remember doing the talks on them, it was in the
newspapers at the time, the general newspapers.
The money was coming into Qatar and different places, and weaponry, and
etc. They were all getting funded and trained and all the rest of it. We know
who the coterie of groups that were doing it all were about. It really upset
them, you see. They continued with Obama, and Obama had more wars. He
expanded the wars and got approval from the PNAC group. Rumsfeld, remember,
Donald Rumsfeld congratulated him for
continuing the same wars and expanding them against the same countries.
Then you get Donald Trump, you see, who didn’t
even really retaliate big-time against the fake chemical attack in Syria.
Because they put out that little thing, well, we can’t go to war with them
unless they use chemicals on their own people. So, that fake one, of course.
And it’s all being expounded by Craig Murray and others as to what really
happened there, who followed up all the real details on it. Then you have Trump just, you know, a kind of
a half, not even halfhearted, it wasn’t even that much of a retaliatory against,
he was, something in him said no. We’ll
never really figure it out. But the press initially gave him kudos for it and gave
him good points, for the first time that he got in he got good points. He had
like, continue Donald, get rid of Assad, you see.
Because that’s what the US does. Through the CIA.
And the CIA really runs it all, that part of it, right. They wanted Assad out.
Of course their, the deep state, the PNAC group and yada, ya, it’s all the same
group, but they wanted Assad out and they had wanted him out for years. To
democratize, you know, at the very least what they say is, to put in more a representative
type governments, more secular, they call it, a more secular type
government. Remember when they had the big one in Egypt, the revolution? Again,
funded by the West. The one that got in wasn’t secular enough, so they
got rid of him too with a color revolution. This is what they… This is all
admitted to now.
That’s what you just had in the US, was a
complete color revolution. Following the psyop warfare groups, that are special
forces by the way, and the taking over of all, the whole Internet, using it
against Canadians and Americans now, and Britain, by their own psyop
forces. I read the articles which they’ve
published themselves. Then you have the ones in the streets of course that
they’re all psyops groups. They always
look for favorable groups that they can actually buy off and help lead, to get
the numbers up for their riots or so-called demonstrations and so on. This is
standard, standard color revolution, out of the manuals of warfare put out by
the Department of Defense. Yeah, your own governments are behind it. That’s why
you didn’t get the certain generals who were going to stop it, by the way. I’ll
probably touch on unconventional warfare before the night’s out.
But it’s just astonishing to me listening to
people, that should know better, falling right back into the idea of
voting. As I’ve said before, if voting did you any good it would be made
illegal. Obviously. I’ve heard people recently again say something I’ve
said for months and months and months, and years actually, is that the whole
system is so corrupt anyway, you could never get justice even if it was real,
you see, it’s so corrupt. Because we are corrupt people, you see, today. The
culture is corrupt. Wealth was elevated above all, everything else. You’re
taught to worship the richest people, and those that made it good, become
stars, you know, either music or entertainment, acting. That’s what you’ve been
fed, a steady diet of the lives of the rich and famous.
The rest of the people, the ordinary folk, are
just cast aside as somehow irrelevant. Because that’s a class system, isn’t it,
let’s just talk about the rich and famous. And everybody wants to become that
with their American Idol and British idol and all that, it’s
across the whole planet at the same time. Just coincidental, you know. We used
to say that the rich just get access to the big honeypots, which is the cash
that all comes from you through taxation. Corporations got lumps of money long
before Covid came along, long before the crash of 2007/8. They’re always
getting big cash grants to tide them over, you know, who don’t pay them back
because they’re just little gifts from the public. Because they’re essential
businesses, some of these big businesses, you see. You don’t get it, the little guy, but the big
ones do. Just like Covid, I mean, just the big corporations are allowed to stay
open, their big outlets, eh?
Quite coincidental too because we find that in
the communist writings from 70 or 80 years ago, they’d have become you know,
just big shops that specialize in their own areas across the world. One for
wood products. One for leather products or shoes and things. And maybe one for
food. Isn’t that coincidental? Just, that’s all this is, coincidence, isn’t it?
The big companies.
It’s coincidence too you see, because this is the
most intelligent virus you’ve ever, ever heard of. It’s got so many human
aspects to it, doesn’t it, this virus? Have you noticed it? Not only does it not attack people when
they’re demonstrating or rioting or looting, or burning cities down, it doesn’t
attack them... And they don’t bother either wearing masks, or social
distancing, or staying indoors like everybody else has to stay indoors. And
your governments know too, they’re obviously working with the virus because
your government tells the cops to leave these rioters and looters and that
alone, you see. If you went on the streets for lockdowns you’d be
arrested, or 12 of them would pounce on you. I saw that happening in a little
clip in the video. Some guy was in the street in a curfew place in the States,
I think I mentioned it last week, and about 12 of them pounced on him and
battered him into the dust. The same cops that would not touch, hhhch, the
Antifa.
So how come? Have they all got pacts with this
Covid virus or something? When they can… The virus too, knows that if you go
into a restaurant and as long as you sit in the right place and you take the
mask off, just to eat the food, and put it back on, it will not attack you.
That’s a very congenial human trait, that, you know. It’s got some sympathy for
the starving people. You’ve never seen a virus like this, obviously. And as
soon as the riots and that are over, eh, there’s the governments parroting the
same mantras. Because they’re all getting it from the same source worldwide,
including the phrases and sentences to use and that. Total lockdown again, oh,
it’s just rampaging through. But if you
get tested every day you might get a little pass so that you could be out in
curfew maybe, if you have the apps on the phone and all that, and you’re a
good, good, good citizen, you see, you’re doing what you’re…
We are becoming more and more like the Chinese
all the time with their social credit system. Which is part of it, folks. It
was all tested out in China. Including the apps for the color coding on your
app for your virus, you know, and if you’ve been near someone it will flash
red. You’d better turn yourself in or the cops will pick you up, eh. Ftt. I tell ya.
Technocracy. Technical. Hm. Technocracy. So here it all is. And the folk can’t really recognize it. But
at least we’ve got a congenial virus that’s got some sympathy once in a while,
eh, for the human condition. Obviously. Yep. [Alan chuckles.]
There was some article the other day in the
paper, it was about some fellow, a father who went into one of the big stores.
The father had a mask on, but his son has a problem with the mask, I think he
had asthma or something. So the, I think the, I don’t know what happened but
anyway they said the manager asked them to leave because the son didn’t have
the mask on, even though he was told he had a problem with his breathing. Which
tells you that humans definitely don’t have the same sympathy as the Covid
does, eh?! But anyway, the father, you see the father getting arrested by the
two cops behind him, neither of the cops is wearing a mask! So again, this
virus knows who’s an authority and is working for the greater good, as opposed
to that nasty man who had the son who couldn’t wear it because of asthma or
something. There ya go. What kind of…
I have no faith in humanity that won’t stand up
against… what would you call these characters, who sell out their own people
for a paycheck, with the cops there doing unspeakable things to quite innocent
people?! These are the same characters that Solzhenitsyn warned you about when
the NKVD and the Cheka would come in the middle night and grab your neighbors
and turn out streets, to make sure you’re terrified as you saw them bundled in
and beaten up into the vans and taken away. A terror campaign on the people. He
says, that’s when you stop it. That’s when you stop it. He says, the
neighbors could have stopped it and grabbed anything for weapons and just went
for them right at the very first. That would have
stopped it. Instead of having 70 years of horror. Hhhch.
But when I saw those guys working for a paycheck,
arresting the guy, you know… Never mind the stores that should be completely
boycotted by the general public! But it won’t happen because you’ll never, and
this is what the elite know, you’ll never get the general public collectively
standing up against anything. That’s what they’ve always known. In fact, with
unconventional warfare and psyops they know they can create divisions amongst
the people. And they know the types that
can actually turn upon you, in the general population, the ones who want to
please and have brownie points, they’ll turn on you. They create these groups
by the way.
The system you live in is completely alien
to what you’ve been brainwashed with. You’ve been trained to be good little
citizens. Just play yourselves, don’t
cause waves. And for a long time you were taught just consume, consume,
consume. Until they had the global system in place, now it’s time to go into post
consumer society [Alan chuckles.] as you’re taught basic necessities and
austerity, that’s the rule. That’s what Technocracy is about now. That’s what
Mr. Schwab is about. You’ll owe nothing,
he says, but you’ll be happy.
There you are, there’s your new masters. Why bother voting when you’ve got
these characters making the rules for you already, and your politicians bowing
to them and doing it all. Why are you voting?
Another thing to
mention here is all the laws now about speech and what you can say and what you
can’t say, right down to what you can think now, eh. And this isn’t new in
Canada. Canada especially is, we’re progressive, you see, and we’re all for everything that comes
down the pike. All to save, to be nice citizens, like China, you see, social credit
systems and scores and go along, be nice and pleasant. Once again, don’t talk about negative things, talk about nice pleasant things. And
be good, and they will tell you what good is, and if you can get little tick
marks for all the good points, then, you’ll be a good citizen, you see.
Canada has had these
speech laws and hate laws since about the 90s, I think, late 90s. And they
enforce them all here in Canada, you know. It starts off as something most
folk, oh well, maybe that’s okay, you
know. But then, as I say, every law that
goes on the books is meant, is MEANT and designed to be expanded to get to its
real goals, and now you’re
seeing them all today. You can’t even, well, Fauci said it and others
have said it too, don’t question the science, you know, like little peasant
you, don’t question the science. Just obey. Just obey. Yep.
Leave it to the experts. Again, Technocracy, you see.
It doesn’t matter if,
and again, years in the future they’ll say, well you see, here’s what happened,
and they’ll give you their version about how we all came into this global
society, a post consumerist society, austerity society. They’ll say then that, yeah, the leaders had
to use noble lies, noble
lies to get the public to comply and go along with it because they would’ve
never done it otherwise, you see. That’s how
they do it, you know. They actually admit that once in a while, with their
noble lies. After the fact though.
In the meantime, yet
they will lie away and tell you that you’re wrong for noticing it. Oh, you’re
bad, you’re bad for speaking about it, did you notice that awful lie they said
there… Even when you’re reading their own articles from the authorities, eh,
the scientific, the authorized scientific authorities. And so many of their own
ones have been pulled now because they say we’ve been misinterpreting what they’re
saying. Even though it’s quite plain
[Alan chuckles.] what they’ve been saying. [Alan chuckles.] What they’ve been
saying, that’s the reason they pulled it, because it doesn’t go along with the
flow of the agenda. Facts don’t matter, eh, when there’s big agendas at work.
But as I say, there’s
a war on the go and so many countries have got all these laws in place. And starting with hate laws. That’s how they start them off. And then
gender laws. And all kinds of laws. But it’s meant to be expanded and expanded,
all the way into a whole new type of human being, eh, where you will be compliant
and happy and have little gold stars on your social credit system. And just
like China, you’ll have access to public libraries and things, and maybe even
better schools, maybe, because that’s how bad it is in China. The parents, if
they’ve spoken out or question it, black mark and the children can’t go to the
better schools and so on. This is your real class system, you see,
based on compliance. And definitely anti free thought. [Alan chuckles.] And we are to emulate all
that.
Because it’s not
efficient. D’you realize how long it
would take with propaganda to persuade you to give up all your rights and
freedoms for the greater good? Quigley said it, he says it would take, you can get more done and five years of
wartime, war, right, where/who take away all the rights and freedoms of
the people, you can get more done,
he’s talking about on a social system basis, in
five years of war than 50 years of peace and propaganda. So there you
go. So this a handy virus, this congenial pro authority virus here, you know,
is helping them put through, and Mr. Schwab himself has said it at the World
Economic Forum, he says, this will help
us get the whole agenda through, the climate agenda. So did the Club of
Rome say that. So did Justin Trudeau
jump on the wagon to get his face in the paper. But many others have said the
same.
This is an old agenda
and this is the way to get it through. Much faster. Much, much faster. It was instant, wasn’t it really, instant
war. And never in wartime before have they actually collapsed the economy by order. [Alan chuckles.]
It’s all happened with an order, they've ordered it all collapsed. Let's
collapse the economy, shut everybody in their homes. Boom. Nothing moves. That's amazing planning,
eh. Amazing. So this handy, one day
there'll be a big museum set up for this virus, you know. You'll walk through it, at the beginning of
it, all through it to the end and the exit door of how they brought a whole new
system in. This is the most congenial virus they've ever had for the big boys
agenda. Step-by-step, all the way through it. Yep.
At the other end
you'll have, you won't have health anymore. I remember giving these talks again
20 years ago, wellness, wellness.
Where'd you get this term wellness? This is all part of the agenda, you
see, wellness. You say, how is
your health doing, you know? How is your wellness now. Now, wellness
also according to Schwab and people long before him by the way have said, well
wellness is your complete self, that’s the holistic you, you see, it's all one,
your mind, body, soul, everything, all brought together, how is...
I remember giving the
talks again 20 years ago, I says, one day the techniques they're going to use
on you electronic and otherwise, hm, the Technotronic type warfare, I says, it
was like the movie, that movie that Schwarzenegger was in when he goes to Mars,
you know. He goes to a place for, you
get a virtual holiday. He's strapped in
a chair and they inject something in you to get the whole process, and then
they put this thing on your head, a kind of Corbin type helmet idea. They could
literally give you, you could actually pick your adventure, to be a spy or an
agent or something, an adventure.
It all goes wrong
because he's already been programmed, you see, the folk who are doing this
entertainment thing on him didn't know he'd been programmed already. It was a
good story, quite entertaining. But from that I remember giving a talk saying,
you know what you're going to get is a system, in a post consumer society... So
you're postindustrial... They were given consumerism for a while as they
expanded the agenda worldwide, to keep you brave, munching happily in their
fields, you see, and now they're taking it away from you step-by-step across
the planet now for the global system. And you need global governance to manage
this pandemic. Again, a very congenial virus. Accolades to this virus and this
big museum in the future, eh, for what it accomplished.
You see, you didn't
need governments. You didn't need all these organizations. All you needed was
the right kind of virus that was congenial to all your agendas, you see, and it
will accomplish it all. So you go into a wellness society. And wellness as I say 20 years ago said, they
said, I said you could be literally standing with a pitchfork mucking out a bier,
as they call it, in Britain, mucking it out, you know, the animal bier, but in
your head you could be on Mars or the moon or somewhere or having an adventure
in space. In a virtual world. And you’re quite happy, you know, quite happy
doing awful work that somebody has to do. And paid pittances, because you really
won't even need money when you're happy, will you? You could, in your own mind
you think you've got everything at my fingertips, everything, you know, and you'll
be a happy compliant citizen.
And you'll have a
little stamp on your head saying, socially approved by the authorities. Bang.
Quality control. Bung. A little tattoo on your forehead, eh. I used to joke
about that, but not really jokes, I knew it would come. And it is coming, and folk still think it
must be a joke. No, it's not. [Alan
laughing.] It's coming all right. Faster than you think.
I remember reading
about the earth armies, they were creating these massive earth armies they
called them. They had different, when
folk started to catch on a little, a few folk catching on to what they really
meant, then they put fake earth armies out to just pull you off and sidetrack
you. But really these were the environmental armies, eh, and the sustainability
armies. For human sustainability. Which meant the population. Post consumer
society. Austerity. Yep. Austerity measures. That's where you're all going, you
see, austerity.
And don't think for a
moment that China is going to get preferential treatment out of it all. Because
the same people that created modern China, I mean, the elite of China are part
of the big global society that runs the world. The big club. They and their
children and their grandchildren will go on for centuries. This is how it's planned; they’re going to go
on for centuries. They are in the same thing.
They're not going to keep millions of Chinese around in a society where
they don't need them. And eventually they won't need even the human labor.
We truly are managed
like animals. You don't frighten animals, you be nice to animals, and you pat
their heads once in a while, you know. But you always maneuver them up to the
next step and the next step and the next step.
That's where we're going with it all.
There are those who on
the higher social credit system, who've served the system, and serve
the masters on higher levels of the system, the pyramid… The pyramid symbolizes that, the pyramid they
use in the occult circles of course with its multilevel systems of building.
The dollar bill in the States is the famous one, everybody knows that one.
Although it was used long before that too by the way, thousands of years ago.
But on the dollar bill they used it, and it was, that there is a new secular
order, novus ordo seclorum.
Also it shows you all
the grass in the bottom of it, it's like brush. That symbolizes the general
population, the unwashed masses, the raw, the raw, raw resources you might call
them. So untamed, you know, basically the primitives of Huxley's Brave New
World in a sense too. Then there is all the shaped bricks, you see, for the
building, the pyramid, and the tiers of management going up to the top. And you
go up towards the top, it actually gets narrower and narrower, and there's
fewer and fewer in each section that keep the secrets of management of the
populace down below. That's what are running, that's what runs us of course,
are these occult organizations that the public never ever, they laugh them off
as, great how you can actually be taught to laugh it off and think, oh, it's
just conspiracy nonsense, isn't it, eh.
Isn't it?
It's quite amazing
too, I mean, I was asked to go on TV shows quite some years back when it was
becoming popular to go into conspiracy shows and so on, television shows. And
they quizzed me, you know, by phone in advance. It was an awfully well-known
one. I went through some of the agendas that was planned, but I was giving them
facts, you see. And they pretty well
said, can you kind of bend the
facts a little, you know, go around them? I says, well these are the facts though. They
says, we know that. I wouldn't bend, you see, so that was the last I
heard of them. But they quizzed me. Nothing spontaneous. Anything you see on TV, that means it's
watered-down, diluted or subverted, and it's off on a different tangent. That's
how you defuse something. That's counterintelligence, you see.
If you play the game
and go along in the world, and you've got the abilities and the knowledge,
yeah, you'll get well rewarded. And doors will open for you. And most folk go
along. It's the same as the cops I'm talking about that arrested that guy. And
other cops too from all the countless clips you see now, what cops are up to in
different countries. These folks should
be fired immediately. But again, you need the public to all stand and demand it.
Because they're supposed to be the public servants aren't they. Not the masters.
Even this very talk I
gave 20 years ago I said, the public could stop anything if they wanted to. But they never, again, you
cannot GET them to go along with it all. Can't do it. That's why the psyops, if
you study again Department of Defense psyops, they go into how to divide and
conquer the population. And the specific propaganda aimed at the women, in
different nations. They already have anthropologists and sociologists working
with them, and psychologists and behaviorists all working with them. I remember
giving the talks when they went into Iraq, they had about five or six top
anthropologists working with them to give them the culture of the people, so
you'd know what kind of propaganda, they'd work with the psyops teams for
propaganda and how to manipulate and get them on board with you, or create more
divisions, and then you would use some of the divisions on your side to fight
the other ones. This was in the manuals by the way, official government
manuals, Department of Defense. That's what you had during the whole time with
the riots and the demonstrations and burnings in the States. Perfect Department
of Defense psyop.
So I'll get back on to
what I was saying in the beginning was I'll put up that link to the video with
Patrick Wood and James Delingpole.
Technocracy And The Great Reset - Patrick Wood and James Delingpole - bitchute.com / 28 Nov 2020
I haven't seen it all
myself because I can’t, I, again, hhhch.
I know that psyops is working, I know the big agencies are working too,
military types too. It's in the papers,
they're attacking people who are speaking out. I've been attacked for years for
speaking out about the agenda, long before Covid.
But you can actually,
I've sat on the phone with my satellite company so many times when the speed
winnows off into dial up speed. When
there's no cloud in the sky by the way, you know. And going through the farces
of, well try this and try that, switch it off, switch it back on, dut-dut-dut,
as they play with you rather than tell you you're on a lock, you know. [Alan chuckles.] You've been choked as they call it. And it's
happening all the time. So the only time I can see anything for any length of
time, even 5, 10 minutes, is the middle of the night, literally. Then of course
that's the only time they will give you speed then. It's to train you to stay up all night long.
As Bernays said, you know, don't make a
better product to suit the people, train the people to suit your product.
But yeah, you
definitely get attacked, there's no doubt about it. The authorities are showing
more and more, um, it's like a school fight.
This is how they get the fight started in school. So you get someone who complains about
something. Somebody's going to either
punch somebody, I remember they used to do that at school, they'd punch you at
the top of the arm, in passing, you know.
Which is a nerve point, and you get, aaaa, oooou, or they get something
like a scarf and they just flick it, you know, on your skin, booooof. And that
would start a fight off. Then of course the person goes, well stop doing that.
Just like Fight Club the movie, hm. Then you'd see it escalating, as the
chins go out and head goes up, and the eyes stare at each other. There's a
system they go through before they really go for each other.
That's exactly the
same system that governments use with psyop warfare and technical warfare upon
its own people, you know, and you've got Internet warfare, etc. This is what
they do, a little bit at a time. But governments now are showing they are more resolute,
a little bit more resolute, as the chin goes out, as they try to train you to
simply obey and stop bitching about it, you know, yep, stop complaining about
it. A lot of folk buckle under right off the bat, in any fight, you know.
That's how they do it, expecting, they know pretty well how much of a
percentage of the public will just back off, okay, okay, we'll back off, you know.
But the people, you
could change anything if they wanted to. IF they wanted to do. But you cannot
get them to stay together long enough. Unfortunately all the things that glued
them together have been purposely destroyed. Again, I gave these talks, to me
it's like repetition. It's not just
seeing things as they are going to happen, which times you can get a darn good
whiff, no doubt about it. But also, it's repetition, hell is repetition,
isn't it? And it might give you an idea of who's running the show. [Alan
chuckles.]
But again, years ago I
remember giving a talk about how you'll be trained and trained and trained into
obedience, step by step, and how it would be done to you as well, and the
things they would tell you, you'd have to do in order to get your compliance.
It's all here. It's all being done. NOW.
Obviously it's been, these are well
understood techniques that are very, very old. And knowledge is never lost
because knowledge is power. That's why the
historians keep track of how to manage populations in all kinds of situations.
These are wealths of information for those that rule. It's never lost.
But we're going
through today, step by step by step for compliance, techniques and behavior
compliance for behavior modification. The United Nations of course is naturally
on board with it. They talked about how they were training the people to
self-police. Well, this was before you heard the term hate law or hate speech
or anything to do with that. Because hate now is expanded to cover a whole
variety of things. In fact, it's hateful, you see, to talk against Covid.
Unless you are one of the authorities that are authorized to speak about it,
it's hateful, you're an enemy of society, you know, you're dangerous to society
and you're an enemy of the people. This is straight out of the Bolshevik
revolution, that's what they did when they took over initially. Enemy of the
state. What are you thinking about? Oh, you're an enemy of the state. Are you
authorized to say that? To think that? Nope. To the wall. Yep, that's how it's
done.
You're seeing terrible
symptoms of the same kind of attitude. Because it's always the same steps to go
through as they push and they up the ante a little bit more. Up the ante, up
the ante, to see if the kickback is going to come. Or they'll back off a little bit if they
sense through all their studies, instantaneous and real-time studies through
all their algorithms what the public are chatting about, what they're arguing
about. They might back off a little bit here and give it a few days more or a
week more, then push it again, you see. This is like, this is a schoolyard
fight for dominance by the bully. That's what you're going through right now.
All of these things, and
your self-policing, maybe I
shouldn't say that I think that, maybe they're right, maybe I'm bad for society
if I say these things. You see how they
make you unsure of yourself? That’s psychological warfare, you see, self-policing.
Things you would normally do or say in normal everyday life that had no harm in
it at all, is now forbidden, you see. As
you self, oh, maybe I'll shut up and
not say that. Maybe somebody will get offended. Maybe, maybe if I say I cannot
breathe with this mask on somebody will get offended, if I mention it, maybe
they'll come down and clamp it down even, maybe they'll tape it on my face.
Because I'll be an enemy of the people, I'll be dangerous to them if I took it
off to try to breathe. Or maybe I should
just suffocate quietly, then I might be a good citizen with a good social score
or on my social credit system.
Massive psychological
warfare. I get lots and lots and lots of emails from folks that are really
suffering, have lost businesses, family split ups, all that kind of stuff, but
again, through finances all going to pot because it all. Folk locked in,
they're terrified to go out of their homes in case they catch something. Other
ones terrified to go out of their homes in case they get pounced on by
authorities. Because they’ve seen all these little clips of the cops beating up
people. It's just horrible, you know. Folk who at night now in the lockdowns in
parts of Britain and elsewhere, or in the States, are terrified if they get
sick. Should they try and go out or take the person in their home to the hospital? after curfew?
And get caught with the cops and might get beaten up or killed? Hm?
Think about it. These
are dangerous times. Folk are sensing it. But then again, they didn't care
previously with all the folk, and we've had plenty of the top professionals
come out, doctors and surgeons and specialists in all kinds of medical fields,
talking about the countless people who have died because they couldn't get into
the hospital, with the previous ones in the spring, as they shut the hospitals
pretty well down and stopped all elective surgery and emergency surgeries and
things. Folk were dying in agony in their homes. That's horrible. That tells
you the system, we're all expendable to get this agenda through. That's what it's telling you, folks. We're
written off, you know.
I used to wonder years
and years ago, I think it was back in the 90s when so many of the big changes
were, that's when all the bad smells were coming out, bad smells. Folk were
saying, what's going on, you know. You had the police changing the uniforms
into the combat black gear, you know. The
color of the executioner, hm, that's what they use that color for. You had the
antiterrorist bill put through which was a combined omnibus bill put out by Allan
Rock in Canada in the late 90s before 9/11 happened, which would suspend your
rights and lock people up indefinitely without trial, all that stuff, you
know.
At that time at least
the journalists were saying, what on earth is this, this is an antiterrorism
bill, you know, martial law type thing, what was coming down the pike? You had
all these different smells and whiffs of things to come. And whiffs of the
fact, again, they were testing the waters I think as well, never mind getting
the people acclimated to the combat gear and the cops and the changes and all
the rest of it and all that kind of stuff, all in advance of what was to come.
But training the public, constantly training the public into compliance was
part of it too, what to think, what to say, and so on, you know.
Again, even with the
laws, I says, where are they going to take these hate laws, you know? And a
judge was trying someone, a couple of guys had mugged somebody for a
wallet. For the first time I'd read it,
and the newspaper said, they said to them, what were you thinking when you, we know why you robbed the person,
and what were you thinking when you were robbing them? He was trying to find out if it was a racial crime?
Well, most people who are junkies, hhhch, don't care, they don't care who they
robbed. They really don't, you know, they're desperate. But this is where it
ends up going into, what were you thinking when you did that? Now it's, what's
were you thinking when you said that, and then it's, what were you thinking when
you thought it? [Alan laughing.] That's what's coming down to. And it's all
kinds of things they've added onto it as well.
That's when they first
brought out the term in the 90s as well, antigovernment. That's a term they
used to use in the Soviet Union, antigovernment. It was during the Bush reign
they started bringing it out more and more in the States and Canada,
antigovernment. So if you questioned anything about government, what they were
up to, or the undue use of military force inside the US in a few instances,
you're anti-, anybody who protested what they government was doing was
antigovernment. No, you weren't protesting the event, no, obviously you were
anti-government.
Hhhch. You see how they change it?
It's like saying if
someone doesn't want a vaccination, A vaccination, they're now called anti-vaxxers, like
smeared with all vaccinations. You see, that's how they do it. This
is psychological warfare. That's what it is. Pure psychological warfare. And
they smeared everybody that does it go along with it. That's again,
psychological warfare.
It isn't just the 77th
Brigade in Britain, but they've got brigades in the States and Canada doing it,
Canada is working with the States and the CIA all the time. In the 90s too, I
mentioned before, that they expanded it in 2001. They opened up bases, like
offices, and throughout Canada, for the FBI. And I says, what's coming along
the pike here with these bad smells, eh? What's going on here? People would be antigovernment,
not just anti-something that government had done, no. Suddenly you're going to
be antigovernment for
complaining about anything the government had done. That's how it, that's what's going on here.
Massive psychological
warfare against its own people. I've always said we pay for our chains, we pay
for it all. We pay the salaries of these, you know, cyber warfare organizations
that are being used against us. We pay for it all. And psychological war and
all the incredible mayhem that that it creates too, we pay for all that as
well. And you want to vote for these governments?
We are all Pavlov's
dogs. Do you understand that? We are all
Pavlov's dogs. That evil character Pavlov that Eleanor Roosevelt loved, she
went over to see him, she thought he was the greatest thing to humanity, the
greatest thing since sliced bread as they say. He was a genius of a man who
could modify the behavior of people. Do you think he just wanted to train the
dogs in a different way, you know? Of course he didn't. He was trying to find
out if humans would react the same, and they didn't just use dogs by the way,
oh, ho, in the Soviet Union.
But I mean, you see,
you're all dogs. You've been trained to be fearful, you know. Before, just take
your little bubble of a world, eh, you, personally, and you're Pavlov's dog. So
yeah, I can go to the pub and I can have a drink and I can go here and I can do
that, I can go to the store and I can dut-dut-dut, I can meet friends and...
eh, in a little bubble. But then Pavlov says, okay, let's watch what he does
now. You go off to do your usual
routine, I'll go and see so-and-so tonight. Bingo, as you just about near this
particular person's home or whatever it is where you meet your buddies, you get
an electric shock.
Bzz-zzz-zzz-zzz-zzz-zzz-zzz, you know, and down you go. Then you get up,
well what on earth happened there? And you're still confused and the whole
thing and you stagger back across that line, bzz-zzz-zzz-zzz-zzz, down you go
again, eh. Then you get back up and you're really still confused, and you say,
well what's going on here? Then as you get up off your feet, from staggering,
the cops jump on you and start beating you up and beating you up and beating
you. So you associate getting beaten up,
and shocked, with not to be where you are, you see, at that person's house,
that's it. So you go home, and you say, I'm not going to go back there again.
So few weeks go by,
and I'll go to... Richards house, right. So you go to Richard's house and it's
fine and you can go back-and-forth, back-and-forth. And you go to other pals houses, except that
one house where you got zapped, eh. Then when you go to Richard’s house, and
you get near the door and bzz-zzz-zzz, down you go again, eh. Then the cops jump on you, and they beat you
and beat you and beat you, you see. Then
you go back home, well I'm not going to Richard's house either, eh. So Joe is out,
and Richard is out, so...
Step-by-step, then for
a while it's fine. All the rest of them are fine for a while, right. Until you
get a zap at every one of them and beaten up. Until, and then the cops say, we
won't beat you up if you go there, and they point you to where to go. It's one of the old dingy bars somewhere. You
say, okay I'll go there then, eh. So you
go there and you're complying with the cops, and it's fine for a year or so.
Then one night you go into the bar and bzz-zzz-zzz, you get zapped there as
well. Then you have a complete nervous
collapse and a nervous breakdown like the dogs did. Because now you're doing everything that they
want you to do, and even then it's not satisfied, you still get punished. So
your mind collapses.
That's all happening to
you, folks. Intense never ending psychological warfare. Including the use
of the media to terrify you. Not just
with the Covid stories but with the reaction of the police in different
countries to the general public. It's meant to terrify you into
compliance. And you can't please them.
Because they've just started with their demands. You're supposed to come out of
this like a remade, you know, person, a person who has been through MK ultra
with a mind wipe, ha, a memory wipe, the whole lot, boof, remade in your master’s
image, Mr. Schwab, you know. Obedient. Post consumerist. Living in utter austerity. And as he says, you'll own nothing, but you'll be happy.
Woof-woof.
Now, I'll just mention
here again cuttingthroughthematrix.com. You can buy the books and discs
at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. You can donate to me. You can use
PayPal. Send personal checks. Send cash.
In some countries you can still get international postal money orders from your
post office to Canada. Not from the
States though, they stopped that. Money Gram and you've got other ways to get
the cash to me. So let me know and keep in touch with me. Keep me ticking along
here because we're going through incredible times. I have to admit, there's very few legitimate
groups out there now. You know? In psychological warfare and in psyop, psyops
are combined with information technologies and unconventional warfare, that's
what they do. They literally give you lots of people that would speak for you, [Alan
chuckles.] they make sure that they can eventually give you your leaders. It's
not new.
An example used to be
given with the Communists, and they gave examples many years ago about the
Communists. It would be often a lady who
would come in, a woman who would come in and volunteered to help the local group
of whatever the organization was. It didn't have to even be political or seem
to be political, but something that had lots of members. They would come in on
their off time, and eventually they would volunteer more than anybody. Oh, don't worry, I'll stay all night and fix all
these books and everything for you and so on and get everything shipshape, etc.
And before you know it, when it came time
to elect a leader, they'd all elect that person. So now you've got a Communists leading the
group.
It happened in labor
unions. It happened across the board. Standard techniques. Well now of course
your own governments use it all quite naturally and they use it with psychological
warfare and unconventional warfare techniques. Against their own people. I've
always said it, one of the biggest parts of the intelligence operation is
counterintelligence. It's as old as the hills. It's as old as Plato talking
about it in ancient Greece, you know, in Athens and, you don't allow grassroots operations just to come out of nowhere
and do their own thing, unless you create them. If you create them, it's
because the elite authorized them to be created because it's going to serve the
purpose of the elite.
You know if you are
going to bring them, for instance, austerity upon the people, as an example, you
would want to make sure that, because you know darn well it's going to be a lot
of little groups that will start off with a few pennies here and there and get
websites going. And they might get angry
and vent frustration about what governments are doing and pushing you into
austerity. So what you do is you create organizations that first come out
speaking against it all, you see, and you give them fantastic credentials,
sometimes, great things to get people on board. Well, the person must be
genuine because they arrested him once or twice, you know, stuff like that.
This is how, this is standard stuff by the way, from textbooks. They get people to accept them, and the next
thing you know they become the leaders, and they are well-funded, and then they
go along with the agendas, and they'll just swerve you off into a different
direction. You think you're all heading towards the same goal, the road you're
on starts to go off on a different tangent, and that's counterintelligence.
That's how it's done.
And LOTS of them came
out in the 90s. Folk have no idea of the intense warfare that was really going
on in the social spheres. Because they were getting, preparing for all the big
changes they'd bring in, in the 21st century. Preparing for it, and testing
some of it out, and then studying the reactions of the people and so on. Yeah,
a lot of them were invented back then, their personalities and their personas
and their roles. They even have them churning out books sometimes.
Ghostwritten. But collecting all the other so-called patriot or alternative
movement books, they would take chapters out of them and put them straight into
their own books. No one could take them to court for it because nobody would go
along with the court case. Nobody. Nobody. Absolutely none. Which tells you it was intelligence agencies
behind it.
But they would just
take whole chapters of people's books, on the Federal Reserve, or scams like
that, you know the money system, and straight into it. They would add little
bits, little sentences here and there, that's all they would have to do. Then they became the local hero. So they became
the ones that you would hear about. They were elevated into prominence and
their books get published across the world.
That takes a lot of management and money. [Alan chuckles.] But you get
little clues here and there of what's going on.
Other ones that were
struggling and genuine were even getting the advertisers threatened to get out,
or else, you know. The advertisers
would, the advertisers were told not to work with them anymore – I know this
for a fact – or something bad would happen to the advertiser. So, they would go straight to the advertisers
and stop their income to their little groups or radio stations or whatever and
they would go under. This literally happened. You have no idea the intense
warfare that was going on behind the scenes. Some of them definitely got bought
off too. Other ones got bought off, no doubt about it, absolutely. And
financial aid from government agencies to get rid of certain peoples as well.
Intense warfare was going on. There’s no point really bitching about it,
because I don't complain about these things because people would say, oh sour
grapes. No, it's not. This is just what happened. It doesn't bother me. That's
what warfare was all about.
What do you think warfare is all about?
Do you think it's Democratic
warfare? with some kind of gentlemen's agreement
somewhere? [Alan chuckles.] Fools. You
have no idea that cyber war and psychological war is just as intense and
ruthless as physical battlefield war. It is a battlefield. And this, as it
said before, when government, it was in the papers last week and the week
before, governments in the States and Britain and Canada are using these teams
against their own citizens. This is a dangerous, dangerous thing, stage to get
to. You've brought the military, your
own military on board to attack your own people. DANGEROUS! Dangerous.
Dangerous. These folk are ruthless. They are meant to be ruthless. That's what
military is about. You don't use them on your own people.
So as I say, you know,
help me tick along hopefully and I can maybe keep on going as we go through
these, probably in your lifetime it would be about the greatest change,
meaning, I mean the biggest change, it's the greatest change in your life's
history. Because what's happening now is going to dictate how it's going to be
for the rest of your life. Absolutely.
A lot of folk already
are, can you believe it, they're already saying, well you know, well Trump
might try with the next election. In
other words, let's wait four years or so and... Every four years that passes is
gone forever. Because the changes they bring in in those four years are here to
stay. And the folk literally, well, you know, are going to go along with the
farce of a front man called Biden. And Kamala Harris. And I think the intention
really is to put her in. He is just like
the launching pad I think really. Because the big characters at the top want
this to happen this way. They planned it this way.
Anyway, again, send a
few bucks my way, etc. and we'll see what we can do and keep on going. I'm
going to go into a few articles here, and I might as I say touch on some of the
cyber warfare that's going on and the psychological warfare that goes along
with it, in unconventional war. And how we know they're going to get their way
one way or another because again they're resolute, that word resolute. They've all sworn to
the agenda. They might not understand it
themselves, all the different officials in different capacities, but they'll
swear to the agenda. Because that's how they got on board with everything and
got their positions in the first place, is working their way up, and it's a
faith-based system, they do what they're told and that's why they're good
little lackeys for those who rule the world.
They're going to get
their vaccines through regardless. I've said that from the very beginning,
nothing is going to change, it's chiseled in stone. Facts don't matter about the whole fiasco.
It's for a new type of system, a new kind of, a monitored, again, China type
system. Everyone's monitored, numbered and so on. And uniform, uniformity is very
important of course. That's why the governments have been studying you for your
whole life. Since the 19..., well, the last 20 years especially more intensely
in real time by all your different social programs, that are part of the
intelligent systems. Of course they are.
Hhhch, they create the systems that they own and they put different people in
charge of them. Again, it's just like politicians and you can throw the
tomatoes at them. That's their job is to be splattered with tomatoes as you get
angry.
But no doubt about it,
the vaccines that come, and all the different ways to get you, coerce you into
it are being tried…
Ankle bracelets,
testing on-board sewage for coronavirus and NO boarding without a vaccine:
Qantas CEO Alan Joyce reveals the very strict rules Aussies will have to follow
just to fly overseas
dailymail.co.uk / 23 Nov 2020
(Alan: Well, they
should find other ways of traveling perhaps, you know. That's the only
way you can head off anything at all, just don't use their systems if
you can. It's a pity that they've demolished all the stores, all the
competition they said they would do, get rid of all small businesses. Even for food and now you've got just the big
ones only, the big standard names, the big club, the big clubs only, these big food
agencies and so on, corporations. The same with airlines too.)
(A: But here you
go, I'd find another way to travel if possible. Even personally, even if you
see all the rest of them will comply, well so what? You've got to be true to
yourself before you can be true to anything else. It isn't just, oh, all or
nothing if we all do it. No, this war is individualistic, folks. Hhhch.
And if there's enough individuals were doing it then, yeah, then you
could say we've got a bit of power now. But it's all individualistic, you know.)
(A: Again, don't
forget too, under a quarantine system, it's just the same as the agenda for the
21st century where they're trying to stop nonessential flying. That was on it
too. They came out with all the
different articles, oh you know, flying is causing pollution in the sky too,
you know. Any excuse using the climate of course to stop you from traveling.
It's the first thing they do, is the agenda for the 21st century, they want you
to live in your own community, and it was called communitarianism.)
(A: I gave these talks years ago, communitarianism, from their own articles. It's all here. And it certainly will be here very shortly. You'll all be part of your community, and you'd better turn up at all the different parades for the right kind of things and celebrations of the right kind of things and so on. Or they will want to know WHY you didn't turn up. That's what you had an Orwell's 1984 as well, you know, you had to attend these different parades that they'd have where they'd parade captured prisoners and so on, and you'd have to boo and scream at them to show that you were part of your system, you see, on board with it all. That's what it says…)
Aussies will have to comply with strict new rules when international flights finally return to the skies post-coronavirus, Qantas boss Alan Joyce has warned.
(A: Well, tell
Joyce just go and take his company to you know where, hm.)
From anklet
bracelets to DNA tests, (A: They want your DNA test? What do you think
the swabbing is about, folks? You think it’s just a test for little bits and
pieces of viruses so’s they can multiply them so many cycles then say well it
could be a virus there. Do you think is just about that? These are the same swab
tests they do for your DNA, eh, inside the cheeks, back of the throat,
whatever, inside the... It’s all your
DNA, folks. M-hm.)
Sewage testing on planes and mandatory vaccinations, overseas travel will never be the same again.
(A: Well, stuff it then. Stuff it. There ya go.)
Mr Joyce revealed his airline will overhaul its terms and conditions for travel where a coronavirus vaccination will be a compulsory requirement for passengers heading abroad, which could be as early as next year.
(A: Yep.
There ya go.)
There you go, so
that's it there. It's permanent, folks. It's just astonishing that this virus
has meant so many things to so many globalists, you know. It's a very compliant virus. It's on board.
It must be a high member, this virus, of the world dominant globalist society.
Don't you think so? But they want to even test sewage for it, there you go,
eh. Great money. I guess that's the only
work there will ever be now, is money in you know what, eh.
Also…
Tighter tier
restrictions could 'spell the end of the traditional British pub'
Again, to me
it's like Groundhog Day, you know. When I gave talks about the pubs in Britain,
were the places where everybody met to talk. For centuries that's how it had
been. A public house they were called, you know, that's where pub comes
from. They go there and chat. Again in Britain you see, the publican, you see,
are licensed to sell the booze. Because
booze is a big, big taxable thing for the government and they make a lot of
money at it. And their pals who own the
brewery companies and the distilleries, very selective, you know, high fees to
get the license, and not everybody gets them, so's only the right kind of
people traditionally make booze, can make the booze, and can make the money off
it.
But the pub
was awfully important because that's where all the chatting took place, you
would meet people, townsfolk or village people, and city people, but towns
especially you'd find about, did you know the Council was thinking about doing
this and doing that. And they would say, oh no, I wouldn't like that. And you could protest it and say no way. So
you could head off nasty things at the pass, you know, things like that. Even
school changes in curriculums, that's where the guys would meet in the pubs,
you know, a teacher, my wife is a teacher, some guy would say, and you wouldn't
believe what they're going to start teaching the children. Oh really? And the
people would get angry.
Because at
one time you had families and they kind of, that's one thing they did, where
they did stand together. Families had a lot in common with other
families, you see. So it was a natural focus for power to be played out with,
on behalf of the public was through the family units that would be combined
together against certain things. The very thing that HG Wells said would have
to be destroyed, [Alan chuckles.] he wanted to destroy the family unit, like
they all do of course. Because if you all, if most families back then and you
had children right, so you had a man and a woman and children. Therefore you
had the same interests pretty well, income, work, schooling, that kind of
stuff. So they would
stand together, very powerful institution was the family. So it had to be destroyed.
Communism
said the destruction of the family unit,
Marxism, and so did the British socialism. So did Freemasonry by the way,
Albert Pike. End of the family unit, and
private property. Agenda 21. The same thing. Just coincidence that
though isn't it.
So anyway...
So the British pub, they've got it in for it now. Well, that's the place where
the people met. I remember giving the
talks, I says, you know it wasn't until maybe about the 80s, late 70s and 80s
that suddenly they started to put television sets in all the bars in Britain.
Now, you went to a bar to get away from TV and radio, you see, and to hear what
other guys had to say. That's generally what you want for, was a place, that
was the meeting place for people. You would hear all kinds of points of
view. That's the wonder thing about it
too, when people used to think for themselves, you get lots of points of view
on the same topics, a variety of them and that was a great thing to have.
But once the
TV came in suddenly everybody, and people tried to shout over the TV sets, it
was mainly sports for goodness sake, promoted from the top, right. By that time
so many of the pubs in Britain belonged to like chains, chains, big corporate
chains. So the government, again, wanted
to end the people talking. It was a nuisance for folk talk about things, finding
out what government’s up to and then interfere. It's a nuisance, that, for
those that rule you. So they’d pay these
big chains or give them tax breaks if they would start putting TV sets in all
their, until literally you couldn't find a pub pretty well where you'd walk in
and there is this racket going on of screaming and yelling and people playing,
you couldn't tell who... Who CARED what team was playing who? Really. I had no
interest at all. I knew what it was all
about, you see. But it was to stop people talking. Eventually you would get fed
up yelling at people, you just gave up, because you had to yell to be heard or
in order to hear them. It was just too frustrating. It worked wonders for
stopping chat, you see.
At one time
too it was so important by the way, you know, that governments also used the
publicans in rural areas in towns and villages almost like spies, because
they'd get all the gossip [Alan chuckles.] of what the people were up to and
what they were thinking about and so on. So they could use them against the
people again, eh. Nothing is there for what you think it is, that's what I'm
saying to you. Even if some of them start off there for you, they get bought
over rather quickly and brought on board to work for the authorities. Then they
get little breaks as well, you see.
That's how it works. Nothing is ever as it really, really seems. So you
just tighten your tier restrictions as they say. It says...
Tighter tier
restrictions could 'spell the end of the traditional British pub'
manchestereveningnews.co.uk / 23 Nov 2020
Hospitality is facing another huge blow if the leaks about the new tier restrictions are correct - and industry experts (A: Again, experts, eh.) and local politicians have said it could spell the end of traditional pubs.
(A: Of course. That’s what it’s meant to
do.)
England is due to leave national lockdown on December 2, (A: Nonsense, they’ll keep it locked down.) and will enter back into a three tier system of coronavirus rules and measures.
(A: It’s just prison, isn’t it, it’s like
lockdowns in prison. This is what it is, eh, that’s what you use. It’s all
lockdowns in prison where you’re allowed to move to and whether you can go
along this corridor, not along that corridor and so on. Maybe in the exercise
yard. You can’t even do that now unless you have a reason for being there apart
from exercise.)
But compared to the system introduced in October, the new tiers are expected to be much tougher - particularly for pubs and restaurants.
It could mean that areas placed into Tier 3 restrictions - and with infection rates still above the national average here,
(A: Well, just stop testing, then they’ll
plummet.)
that could very well include Greater Manchester - will have to keep all hospitality venues closed.
Maybe if you got the right kind of variety or
strain of this coronavirus it will allow you to drink, you know, as long as you
just pull the facemask down for each sip, and then back up again. Or maybe
someday, I was thinking of, how come no one has invented a straw yet that will
fix on to your facemask, eh? And we could all learn sign language to talk to
each other. Because you know, and you've seen it in stores, the people that are
serving you sometimes pull the mask down, because they know you can't hear
them, and they can't hear you, it's all muffled. [Alan laughing.] You can't read the lips, you
see, so maybe we should all learn sign language as well. And have little straws
there. I guess you can still blare the
television in the background there and, yeah, he shoots, he scores and
rah-rah-rah, yeah. And you're sitting
there in dead quiet and sign language the other person there with your hands
and stuff, and sipping your beer through a straw, through the facemask. There
you go. There you go. How is that?
I'm sure somebody will come along with that
eventually. As long as authorities and experts, you know, the experts approve
it and say well that's okay that will stop it, you know. M-hm.
Maybe you could even have a little ultraviolet, here's a, I'm really
getting carried away here. All of my
ideas get picked up over the years, I gotta tell ya. [Alan chuckles.] So get a little facemask
one, as I say, with that straw through it, right. And a one-way valve, so when you pull it out
it closes, you see, it closes the valve and it's perfectly safe. And at the
other end of your beer, you put it in the beer, of course you could have a
bottle, and you could have a little filter from the bottle so's the air comes
in as you're sucking out the booze, then the air can come in through a filter
and it would filter out the viruses.
OR, if you really get the deluxe model, you could
get one where it, it will have an ultraviolet bulb in there, battery driven.
Because you don't want to get electrocuted maybe, so you get a battery one. It
will kill off any viruses that come through. So you could go really high-tech
with that. And you could have a classier
type of food place to get drunk in.
Because in the better bar you would have the electronic devices there
you see, the electronic filters and everything else for your booze, and you
will all be sitting signing each other, you know. How about that then? Good citizens, eh? Good compliant citizens. The governments
would love that. They really would. And the behaviorists would, oh, my, it's
working, it's wonderful. They love that too. So there you go.
Scotland, Iiiiii really, it's like, Scotland and
Ireland, it's just astonishing. I mean, with the histories the countries have
had, you know. And so socialistic, you
know. People don't know the histories of
it. But really, they were always
problems, they were always problems to the English crown, you know. Mainly
because they didn't like getting dominated.
That might've had something to do with it, eh. But once they got their,
they think they got their freedom, eh. That
was another big joke too, they had their national movements and end up
being communistic. That was part of the communist tragedy by the way, you start
off in a country and you give it wars of national liberation, that's what they
called it. It was programed to have/get them fighting against existing authorities
or rulers, and then they'd say okay we've got independence now. Then you
introduce the socialistic communistic ideas until it's communist. That was, that's from the handbook of
communism, eh, how to do it all.
So Scotland really thought it had become free,
and they have no idea that all the leaders they supplied you with were pretty
well working for the big global system.
So as soon as you end up being free, as they think, they've got mass
migration. In tiny countries,
really. Mass migration. Lots of them got
into Parliament that are wealthy, you see.
Or they're brought in, because they're not from Scotland. They're brought into Parliament and circles
and civil service. They immediately want
to demand that, basically unlimited immigration. Well, how can you have a country anymore if
it's not yours? It's got nothing in common eventually, in one generation you
could have nothing in common with what it stood for. [Alan chuckles.] Nothing
at all. So it's a complete bogus freedom obviously.
Ireland too, even in its initial rebellion, well
in the 20th century rebellion, was run by the official IRA. And it was a
menagerie of different groups, a kind of collage system you might call it. But they all had this idea of freedom and
independence. But also the official IRA were communistic, a lot of them were
communist leaders. So that had a lot to
do with what happened, the way that they ended up bringing in the system. A lot of them didn't realize, no, you
don't have to use the term communism, you know, to be communist. You just need
to see all the signs and symptoms of it, and you are. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a
duck...
So unfortunately, they've been ruled for a long
time now by a system that brought them under the yoke of the EU, a bigger
dominant factor, hhhch, as opposed to London. And they think that they're free.
Then they end up getting, Ireland especially got soaked, mind you, in the
2007/8 collapse. Because before that
they had been encouraged by the World Bank to borrow, borrow, borrow,
borrow. And they did. When they
collapsed it all then they said, basically in comes the IMF and says this is
how you're going to pay us back. And they pretty well own them now. They own
all their policies. When the IMF comes in, they decide how much you're going to
spend on the people, you know, your own tax money, how much is going to be
spent on your own people, or healthcare or anything else. Folk don't realize
it, when Margaret Thatcher was in, in Britain, England, the IMF ran the show for
a while. She was taking a lot of stick for the austerity measures, but
basically the IMF was deciding a lot of the policies. It's repayment terms, you
understand. That's what runs everything, eh.
So anyway, yeah, it's a sad thing that…
Scotland becomes the first country in the world to pass landmark legislation offering free period products to anyone who needs them - dailymail.co.uk / 24 Nov 2020
This from
The Mail Online. Also another article from a newspaper in India.
Scotland becomes first country in the world to make sanitary products free for women - zeenews.india.com / 25 Nov 2020
And it is awfully good at noticing what's
happening across the world. And sometimes more open about it. Because they
don't have the same guilt about saying things. They haven't been trained yet
to, hhhch, not say different things, so they're quite open about it. So it's interesting, you read different
articles from India, you know. In fact,
you'll find some of the journalists in India have the old type of journalism
approach to journalism as being true and get to the bottom of things. And they
don't have to be so politicized and be awfully nice about everything, they can
be straightforward. That's how
journalism really should have been, used to be actually. Now it's completely
bought and paid for in the West by those that own it all.
Scotland becomes
the first country in the world to pass landmark legislation offering free
period products to anyone who needs them
dailymail.co.uk / 24 Nov 2020
(A: So yeah, I
mean, Scotland, this is them vying for the vote again for re-voting for
independence for Scotland, eh. So they
aim for the women first, I think Ireland has already got daycare and stuff like
that for free. It's the first thing
generally they all get. Then you go for,
step by step, you buy people off, eh. So
it's going to…)
... make sanitary available to everyone
(A: What do you
mean everyone? [Alan laughing.] Do you
see how it's worded here? I mean, who wants them all?)
The Bill was brought forward by Labour health spokeswoman Monica Lennon
(A: I don't know
if she changed her name or what, but she goes by Monica Lennon. That might be telling in itself, I don't
know.)
Labour Member of Scottish Parliament working to tackle period poverty (A: ...period poverty, eh...) since she was elected in 2016
...make things free, eh? So there you go. Rather
than say, why are women so poor? Rather than tackle the real problems, eh? And
why are the rest of the people poor in Scotland? Why not deal for people as
people, not genders and so on. Poverty is not just a gender thing, you know. It
affects, you know, men, women and children. But this is how they waylay you
with this kind of publicity kind of thing, you see. There you go.
But remember, the socialist governments, even
Canada did it too, through the conservative government that was in at the time,
was pushing this on... When you see the
same agendas through different parties, you know that's what it is, it's
an agenda, you're under tyranny,
as Jefferson said, you're under somebody's agenda. Hhhch.
Because nothing halts, Trump is the first time I've seen them skipping a
beat. It generally makes no difference
what party is in, the same preplanned agendas go forth, you see. So there you
go. But yeah, let's not try, let's not tackle the poverty, etc., etc. Nothing
is free when the taxpayers have to pay for it. What are you talking about,
free? Yep. There you go. Ftt, there you go. N-n-n.
Another article here is to do with, hhhch…
hhhch...
Can I stay
overnight with family in Tier 2 or Tier 3 this Christmas? (A: Right.)
express.co.uk / 27 Nov 2020
CHRISTMAS is just around the corner, and anxious Britons have been waiting for information on how they can see loved ones
(A: You’re
waiting for information to see if you can see your loved ones? Do you
understand what’s going on here?)
during the ongoing pandemic.
(A: [Alan
chuckles.])
But can I stay overnight with family in Tier 2 or Tier 3 this Christmas?
(A: Can you
believe this stuff? Are they going to start publishing manuals, like prison
manuals, for their prisoners, you know? Hm? It says…)
Areas across the UK will be placed into either Tier 1, Tier 2 or Tier 3 depending on the coronavirus cases and other criteria.
Middlesbrough,
Newcastle and Yorkshire and Humber are among those back under Tier 3 status.
You can check which tier your area is in using the Government's postcode
checker here. (A: They give you a
link to it as well. Hhhch.)
However, Britons will have a break from the stringent rules over the festive period in a so-called Christmas bubble it has been revealed.
(A: Isn’t that wonderful! Your wardens are giving
you Christmas bubble. Ftt, ohh.)
From December 23 to December 27 three households will be able to meet indoors, with Mr Johnson calling on families to make a "personal judgment” about the risks of coronavirus to vulnerable loved ones when forming a Christmas bubble.
(A: Hhhhh!
Wow. What drama, eh?)
Can I hug my
grandparents at Christmas? (A: …it says. Mmm, ftt.)
(A: So anyway, it goes on about...)
… winter plan
(A: …and they give you into 2 and 3s and all the
rest of it.)
I think one of them, you have to roll up your
trouser leg and bear your breast, you know, just like Freemasonry. Hop on one leg maybe. And only on a Thursday,
but not on a Wednesday and stuff. It's awfully important you follow these very
important rules, you know. You know? As you get trained and trained into
further absurdities. Really.
You understand the countries that are not doing
the lockdowns are better off than anybody else. Their economies have not
collapsed. The death rates are not
higher, for winter deaths. Hhhch. I say winter deaths because flu is
everything, you know, pneumonias, happens every winter, etc. etc. They are not
up anyway.
But that doesn't matter. You see, it's your
countries that have been deemed excess consumerists. Remember all those years,
the worst country in the world for consumption is America. The US and Britain
and so on, yeah. Well, now you're getting taught by this very handy virus that,
just forget those countries that don't have these lockdowns and they're doing
fine like Sweden and so on, Switzerland too apparently didn't have the severe
lockdowns either. It doesn't matter though. You must because you're
BAD! There ya go.
Another one...
Level 3 of the 'Plan for Living with Covid-19' explained - independent.ie / 24 Nov 2020
…LIVING with Covid 19… This article here is from
an Irish paper. I'll put this one up as well for those that want to look it up
and see what to do, and how you can learn to live with Covid 19. Isn't that
nice, eh? It's like trying to live with
the bombs in the blitz, this is the, [Alan sings...] keep the home
fires burning, and all that stuff and all that nonsense. You know, learn to live with it, and make
the, put the best face on and step forward, there you go, hm.
Also in The Sun newspaper, but there’s more
articles on…
Fury as 20million
Brits are forced into Tier 3 despite R rate below 0
thesun.co.uk / 26 Nov 2020
(A: Hhhhh! The R rate, we're learning a whole vocabulary here now, eh? They're going to give a dictionary for Covid shortly, you know, because it will be a lifelong dictionary, you see, a rulebook, very... You've got to get trained here, for goodness sake.)
MORE than 20million Brits are being forced into the harshest Tier 3 lockdown measures despite falling Covid rates in their areas.
(A: Well, don’t let facts get in the way of
agendas for goodness sake here.)
A staggering 20
million Brits are being forced into… (A: …blah, blah, blah.)
Sixty one percent of the population are now worse off after being shifted into a higher tier.
(A: Well, who saw that coming, eh?!?! Hhhhh!)
Fifty five million Brits are now in tiers two and three - with tougher restrictions than last time.
(A: Well, they said that’s what they’d give you.
The spring was just a training exercise, people, complete training exercise.)
It comes after PM Boris Johnson ramped up restrictions despite data suggesting the R rate is now below 1 — meaning the bug has been kicked into reverse.
Hhhhh!
Well, again, these facts become an awful nuisance. They interfere with planning and things, you
know. Terrible. And this Boris Johnson, what a joke he is, eh? You know darn
well he’s been given his marching orders. He’s got the whole Brexit thing on
stall as well, eh. Because you see, the real deep state didn’t want any, hhhch,
Britain pulling out of that one either. No way. N-n-n.
Ahhhhh, you know, you could speak volumes on just
the free-trade agreements. The creating of centralized control systems like the
EU parliament, and one for the Americas, one for the Pacific Rim reason, and so
on and so on. You can do volumes of that kind of material. All from the same organizations running this.
The same organization. And they don't like Brexit. Goodness me.
N-n-n. I was going to just say,
read their next part, and I thought about Karl Marx. Why do you think he was put up at London? They
put him up in London. A revolutionary,
supposedly going to overthrow all governments and royalty and all the rest
of it. D'you really believe that? They
allowed him to get into the national library there in London, access to all the
very expensive reference books and so on. Of course they loved him, because the
same organization that said we don't
mind if they're communists are fascists or dictators, like Carol Quigley
said, they're all welcome. Is
this starting to make sense to you?
And what was Karl Marx's main thing? Who
congratulated Lincoln for the Civil War and for defeating the South. Karl Marx
in his telegram, for keeping the union together. Centralization of
government. Communist Manifesto. EU parliament, Communist Manifesto. And the
one for the Americas, they wanted, they discussed the parliament by the way up
into 2005 with the three amigos meetings, a centralized parliament for the
Americas, initially they said they might have it in Montréal. It was in the
newspapers. Communist manifesto. Centralized government, centralize the power.
Centralize. Just a coincidence.
Anyway, back to all these articles here.
Fury as 20million
Brits are forced into Tier 3 despite R rate below 0
thesun.co.uk / 26 Nov 2020
Sixty one percent of the population
(A: Not 60% but 61%...)
are now worse off after being shifted into a higher tier.
(A: Well, they stop you from working and so on,
eh. This is worse than any world war, you understand. And it's planned that
way. What a great trick, though, what a great, you must admit, that's a
brilliant trick. I said this years ago, I wasn't afraid of the atomic bomb at
all. I was more afraid of some real rogue letting loose with something that
been designed in a laboratory. Oh, what
a great trick. But even Schwab's posting
about it, a wonderful thing this bug has been to a lot of people down for this
agenda. Hmmmmmmmm. This article also goes on about the pubs...)
...could kill off four out of five boozers and rip the heart out of local communities.
(A: Well, that's
what they want to do, folks. Total war, you see.)
As I say, Boris Johnson is not your, not for you.
Never was. He was always a levelier [?] by the way, Boris Johnson. So they
remake him as a new type of conservative?
[Alan chuckles.] Who's kidding
who? Mayor of the City of London.
Hm. So this, you can't,
eventually the people are going to have to, they either stand up or they don't.
It's very simple, isn't it. As they say, the power is all in the people. But
they will be so divided, and they've got all these psyops working against them
to divide and conquer them, I doubt if they'll get enough people together to
stand up. They might. They could with some miracle. But it would take
literally a miracle to make it happen, I think. Because then government would
have to back off. And try something else. Maybe even something more lethal you
might say. You never know.
This is a BIG agenda that they've been planning
for a long, long time, long before you heard the term Covid, and how they'd get
it through, hm? Well, climate change,
no, try this Covid thing, eh. Hm, ftt.
This other one too…
Moderna vaccine
‘may not stop people spreading Covid’
metro.co.uk / 25 Nov 2020
Moderna’s vaccine may not stop people who catch coronavirus from spreading it to others, him
(A: [Alan
chuckles.] I love how they say it now,
is just like Bertrand Russell said, we’ll
train the people to just parrot experts, until they can’t think for themselves
or decide anything for themselves without the help of an expert. You
don’t even need names now, eh? Generally. So, scientists have warned, eh?)
scientists have warned.
Although promising trial results have shown the US-developed vaccine is 94.5% effective (A: …right…) at stopping people from getting ill, trials haven’t yet tested whether the jab actually prevents transmission.
(A: So I won’t even bother reading it all because it's contradictory in itself. There's quite a few articles like that, that's full of contradictions. So anyway it says, the spokesperson says…)
He urged people not to ‘overinterpret’ the promise of the vaccine,
(A: In other
words, don’t have any faith in it.)
though he said he ‘believes’ it should prevent viral spread.
(A: That’s
science at work, it’s a belief system. Never mind the facts, but this person…)
… ‘believes’
it should prevent viral spread.
Moderna’s jab does not kill the virus, (A: …and this is the important part…) unlike most vaccines…
(A: You know how they take a weakened form of the
virus and they put it into you. The idea is to trick the body, right, in
attacking it as a live virus and creating antibodies so you have immunity. This
is different, Moderna’s one.)
Instead, it is
designed with the intent of preventing the virus from latching onto receptors
on human cells that let the virus enter cells. (A: Okay?)
Unlike more complex human cells, viruses can’t make their own energy. Instead, they have to hijack the machinery of human or animal cells, absorbing that energy and allowing the virus to make copies of itself.
(A: You see.
So that’s the Moderna one.)
How the different Covid-19 vaccine candidates work
(A: …and they give you some more information.)
And without getting into our cells and taking them over for its own purposes, the virus can’t replicate.
(A: This is the idea behind this Moderna
one. It changes, it reprograms your
DNA basically. Permanently. They think. M-hm. This is how it works. This is
a trial. This is a very experimental vaccine. So it's amazing the two don't
know, and this other one, right...)
…suggests its vaccine it developed with Oxford University should prevent viral spread.
(A: …even though it’s early data, and it’s trials are still ongoing. So it hasn’t finished yet, so why would they even be saying that, it should prevent viral spread?)
Pfizer and Moderna only tested trial members who developed possible symptoms of Covid-19, according to Science Magazine.
Without knowing of others members of the trials might have been asymptomatic spreaders, there was no way to say for sure whether the vaccine prevented them from infecting others.
‘When we start the deployment of this vaccine we will not have sufficient concrete data to prove that this vaccine reduces transmission,’ Mr Zaks added.
(A: I’ll say this before I go onto the next
line…)
‘When we start the deployment of this vaccine we will not have sufficient concrete data to prove that this vaccine reduces transmission,’ Mr Zaks added.
‘Do I believe that it prevents transmission? Absolutely, yes, but I saw this because of the science.
(A: He saw it because of the science. Well, it’s
either scientific or it’s not. It’s not a belief system. So it says, hhhch…)
‘Do I believe that it prevents transmission? Absolutely, yes,
(A: Science is not supposed to be based on belief
but on fact and experimentation, and the evidence. Aaaaaaaaaaarrgh. But if you repeat this stuff, you will, oh
you will be hammered for saying it. They can say it, but you can’t say it. This
is the new normal, you see, certain folk can say certain things and you cannot
say it, even though you are reading their stuff, saying it. [Alan chuckles.]
And it says here…)
‘But absent proof I think it’s important
‘But absent proof I think it’s important we don’t change behaviours
(A: …odd sentence. I guess he must’ve missed a
full stop, or a period missing somewhere, or a comma.)
‘But absent proof I think it’s important we don’t change behaviours solely on the basis of vaccination.’
He said people should continue to use preventative methods like mask wearing
(A: So regardless of your vaccination, that’s
what Fauci said months ago, even with
the vaccinations you’re going to have to wear a mask. It truly is
planned this way, you see. This is permanent, folks.)
and social distancing
(A: It’s total
behavior change for the whole society across the planet.)
to stop the spread of coronavirus.
Moderna will continue to collect data if and when its vaccine is approved.
Oxford University and AstraZeneca got all trial participants to swab themselves at home, allowing it to test whether the vaccine was preventing people from transmitting the virus, or just stopping them from becoming unwell.
It's all up in the air, as far as I can see. But
don't let that stop a good agenda, eh. I mean, they've banked everything on
this agenda, folks. Hhhch. So they're
not going to back off for anything at all. Nothing. No. Zilch.
This is an interesting article by Jeremy Loffredo
and Whitney Webb. It says…
The Johns
Hopkins, CDC Plan to Mask Medical Experimentation on Minorities as “Racial
Justice”
unlimitedhangout.com / 25 Nov 2020
(A: That’s an interesting article actually.)
With the first COVID-19 vaccine candidate set to receive an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) from the US government in a matter of days, its distribution and allocation is set to begin “within 24 hours” of that vaccine’s imminent approval.
(A: And this is all with links to the articles,
like, “within 24 hours”, and where that came from, NBC news, etc.)
The allocation strategy of COVID-19 vaccines within the US is set to dramatically differ from previous national vaccination programs. One key difference is that the vaccine effort itself, known as Operation Warp Speed, is being almost completely managed by the US military, (A: I fell better now, don’t you, eh? Hm?) along with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (A: That makes you feel even better again.) and the National Security Agency (NSA), (A: Hhhch, wow.) as opposed to civilian health agencies, which are significantly less involved than previous national vaccination efforts and have even been barred from attending some Warp Speed meetings.
(A: Doesn’t that make you feel better now,
feeling secure and safe, eh?)
In addition, for the first time since 2001, law enforcement officers and DHS officials are set to not be prioritized for early vaccination.
(A: Hmph.
…to not, so they’re not going to get it, right. Why would they not give
it to the Department of Homeland Security officials and law enforcement
officers?)
Another key difference is the plan to utilize a phased approach that targets “populations of focus” identified in advance by different government organizations, including the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).
Characteristics of those “populations of focus,” also referred to as “critical populations” in official documentation, will then be identified by the secretive, Palantir-developed software tool known as “Tiberius” to guide Operation Warp Speed’s vaccine distribution efforts.
Tiberius will provide Palantir access to sensitive health and demographic data of Americans, which the company will use to “help identify high-priority populations at highest risk of infection.”
This report is the first of a three-part series unmasking the racist components of the Pentagon-run project to both develop and distribute a COVID-19 vaccine. It explores the COVID-19 vaccine allocation strategy first outlined by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and subsequent government allocation strategies that were informed by Johns Hopkins.
The main focus of this allocation strategy is to deliver vaccines first to racial minorities but in such a way as to make those minorities feel “at ease” and not like “guinea pigs” when receiving an experimental vaccine that those documents admit is likely cause “certain adverse effects…more frequently in certain population subgroups.” Research has shown that those “subgroups” most at risk for adverse effects are these same minorities.
(A: Hm.)
The documents also acknowledge that information warfare and economic coercion will likely be necessary to combat “vaccine hesitancy”
(A: So they’re using your psyops and cyber warriors. They have literally thousands of cyber warriors working to attack people online and so on, to disrupt your flow of information and, well, it's to treat you as an enemy of the state. To treat you as though you were any enemy that the color revolutions attacked across the world. They go after the citizenry. And they must give you a bad name like vaccine HESITANCY. It’s not a right to decide for yourself. You’re supposed to get and give informed consent. You're supposed to BE informed before you give your consent. Now they're trying to do away with that and just go, vaccine, why are you hesitating? Well I'm thinking about, you know, the information. Informed, you know, information.)
among these minority groups. It even frames this clearly disproportionate focus on racial minorities as related to national concerns over “police brutality,” claiming that giving minorities the experimental vaccine first is necessary to combat “structural racism” and ensure “fairness and justice” in the healthcare system and society at large.
Part 2 of this series will discuss how Palantir, a company currently helping DHS and law enforcement violently target African Americans and Latinos, will be in charge of allocating “tailored” COVID-19 vaccines to those same minorities as well as Palantir’s origins and its executives’ views on race.
Part 3 will explore the direct ties between a COVID-19 vaccine front-runner and the Eugenics Society, which was re-named the Galton Institute in 1989.
(A: By the way, you can go in yourself and see all the articles, they still have lots of them there for the public. Although they have their inner site though, and you have to be a member, a vetted member to get into it and see all the real important stuff. But there's enough interesting information there at the Galton Institute to see what they're up to. You'll see a lot of important well-known names of important people who are members of it. So I'll put this article up too, it goes on and on and on and it's quite good. He goes into the different people involved in this one, different characters like...)
Tom Inglesby, who led discussions at the CHS’s Event 201 exercise in October 2019
(A: ...and so on
and so on. It's a small world when you
see the same names popping up over and over again, eh.)
Another member of the Biden transition team is Luciana Borio, a current member of the CHS steering committee. As both a former FDA scientist and former National Security Council member, Borio signifies the relationship between the national security state and the biosecurity state. She’s currently a vice president of In-Q-Tel, the venture-capital arm of the CIA.
(A: Oh, it’s just a small world indeed isn’t it.)
In-Q-Tel’s current executive vice president, Tara O’Toole, who at the onset of the COVID-19 outbreak declared that “the best way ever to protect those who are well is with vaccines,” is Inglesby’s mentor and predecessor as director of the CHS. She was also a key player and the lead author of the CHS’s Dark Winter and CladeX bioterror simulations.
(A: CladeX is another one. The links are all here for these by the way,
you know, the official links and so on. It’s an interesting article when you
read down through it and so on. Quite a
long one. It goes into previous studies they’ve done already with different
ethnic groups.)
Notably, African Americans are understood to be at a higher risk for adverse reactions to vaccines. According to a study by the University of Pennsylvania (A: And the link study of the university is up here too), African Americans exhibit a disproportionately higher immune response to certain flu shots. And in 2014, the Mayo Clinic (A: The link is here too. These things are all founded on studies and so on, this article.) found that African Americans have almost double the immune response to the rubella vaccine as Caucasian Americans. (A: Eh. Hm.) Immune reactions that are too strong can result in more adverse events and inflammatory responses such as transverse myelitis, a debilitating inflammation and paralysis of the spinal cord. A 2010 study in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health showed that African American boys were at significantly greater risk of suffering severe neurological injury from the hepatitis B shot as compared to Caucasians.
Again, you have a certain vaccines, I've gone
over these before, they can give you, again, disproportionately higher immune
response. If you get a bunch of vaccines
at the same time that can cause it too. I had that, that's what brought on my
arthritis eventually. And my spine was
on fire, believe you me! A whole bunch of vaccines given in the span of about a
week I think it was, and yeah, that happened to me too. So I'm very, very wary
of these things. Absolutely. Certain
folk will get, of course the people that it affects like that they'll just say,
well, they had the wrong genes for our vaccine. [Alan laughing.] Well, my genes were
perfectly fine for everything else until you invented your vaccine. But facts
don't matter.
China Wants
Passenger Tracking System for Global Travel Coronavirus Reset
breitbart.com / 23 Nov 2020
(A: …the same
thing with the planes and so on.)
…wants travelers to adopt a global QR code system to help determine their health status and travel “permissions” in a post-coronavirus pandemic travel reset.
(A: There you go.
It's a reset, everything’s a reset, isn't it, eh. Global mechanisms for it all,
hm.)
During the virtual G20 summit on Saturday, Xi called for a coronavirus “global mechanism” which involves international recognition of health certificates in the form of QR codes to allow people to travel freely.
(A: Well, you could travel freely if you were
free, folks. Having all these codes and permissions is not free. That’s the
difference between RIGHTS, you see, and freedom. You have natural rights, you don’t need
permission to have them, hm.)
The dictator says the system can be based on “nucleic acid testing results in the form of internationally accepted QR codes,” reported state news agency Xinhua.
“We need to further harmonise policies and standards and establish ‘fast tracks’ to facilitate the orderly flow of people,” he is quoted saying.
QR codes are bar codes that can be read by mobile phones that are a common tool of tracking and control in Communist China.
Coming to a place near you. I'll put these links
up there too for those that want to follow it. But nothing really is
surprising, eh. Also...
The COVID-19
RT-PCR Test:
(A: And this article says…)
How to Mislead
All Humanity. Using a “Test” To Lock Down Society
globalresearch.ca / 5 Nov 2020
(A: I’ve already
read articles before on this particular test and why it’s not the most reliable
test. This goes into it again as well, about the amplification. They cycle it,
they call it cycles. They take particles of a virus, or what they think might
be a virus, and amplify it and multiply it many times over in cycles they call
it. When they get a certain level, a
certain amount of cycles, they say there's a possibility there's a virus there.
You can’t tell if it's alive or dead or anything else, or if you've had it for
that matter. Or they can't even tell you if you've been in the vicinity of
someone that had that particles they breathed out and you breathed them
in. You know? M-hm.)
(A: Arghhhhhhhhhh,
but forget the facts. I mean, I've been over this one ad nausea really, and
this one again goes through it all. They tell you about the number of times
they copied it, what they did and said, the makers even say over 30 is very
unreliable. Well, they're using up to 40 odd, maybe 45 cycles to try to get,
hhhch, positives. Well, it's going to
give you more and more false positives, and they actually say that in the
different instructions on it for the laboratories. It doesn't matter. That's why
they picked it. Wherever you go in the world before coronavirus, you're going
to find all kinds of possible bits and pieces of viruses, of coronaviruses. But
it didn't have a political purpose at that time, you know.)
RT-PCR does not reveal any virus, but only parts, specific gene sequences of the virus.
(A: You see.
And they go on and on of how it’s done.)
It’s quite a good article of course, for those
that want to at least get some understanding of how it’s done and how they come
to these conclusions that they do. Maybe find out why they come to these
conclusions, that would be a different thing altogether.
GCHQ in cyberwar
on anti-vaccine propaganda
thetimes.co.uk / 9 Nov 2020
(A: So people who don't want the vaccine, it's not called just anti-vax, now it's anti-vaccine propaganda now, you see. I've already read some of the articles from reputable papers where the people who, the CEOs of the company say, well we BELIEVE it does this and we BELIEVE it does that, and we're not sure about this and that because we haven't finished yet, but we BELIEVE. That's okay for them to say that. But if you, if you go over these articles you're doing anti-vaccine propaganda by just reading it obviously. Hm. Ftt. So...)
GCHQ
The spy agency is using the tools developed to disrupt terrorist groups to tackle disinformation online and on social media.
(A: Now, you can
tell right off the bat that it's the same usual agenda, the same groups running
the intelligence agencies.)
The spy agency is using the tools developed to disrupt terrorist groups to tackle disinformation online and on social media.
(A: And…)
Spies tackle disinformation linked to Russia.
(A: Hhhhh!
Russia! Russia! My goodness, eh. [Alan chuckles.])
GCHQ has begun an offensive cyber operation to disrupt anti-vaccine propaganda being spread by hostile states, the Times understands.
(A: ...it says.
The Times, the newspaper. I've read similar articles on this before. So
it's...)
... using a toolkit developed to tackle disinformation and recruitment material peddled by Islamic State, according to sources.
It is the latest move by cyberagents to counter activity linked to Moscow whose aim is to exploit the pandemic in order to undermine the West and boost Russian interests.
The government regards tackling false information about inoculation as a rising priority as the prospect of a reliable vaccine against the coronavirus draws closer. A government source said: “GCHQ has been told to take out (A: ...to TAKE OUT, I think I read the same one.) antivaxers online and on social media. There are ways they have used to monitor and disrupt terrorist propaganda.”
Like slowing
your computer down, eh. [Alan laughing.]
And worse things of course that they do.
Then they go into the different tactics, if you want to get the whole
article. But it's cyber warfare, and I've already mentioned it, that your own
governments have it in the newspapers, they're using their spy agencies and
their cyber warfare agencies, and other ones too, they're using foreign
governments' cyber warfare agencies to attack your own citizenry. So that's
what it is. That's where your tax money goes.
GCHQ spies launch cyber counter-attack against anti-vaccine propaganda being spread by Russia - dailymail.co.uk / 8 Nov 2020
You know, so
much for your opinions, eh, you can't have your opinions anymore. And you have
no rights over yourself at all, or your body, for goodness sake, the state owns
you body and soul. They can do with it
as they want. Obviously. You're not really using it, are you? I mean, are you
using your body, much, you know, for any good purpose, eh?
Canada now
is blocking bulk exports of drugs to the US it says here.
Canada blocks bulk exports of some prescription drugs in response to Trump import plan - msn.com / 29 Nov 2020
These are
the cheaper, probably the apo type drugs, they call it apo drugs, generic,
noncorporate name type drugs, to the States. And no doubt they've got a good
reason for doing it. Hhhch, like they don't want the public to get some cheaper
drugs. It's probably in fact that someone's got the nudge from the States not
to do it because the States jealously guards its pharmaceutical industry, and
what they want they generally get, you know. Like high prices for stuff, for
their own drugs.
US – UK Intel
Agencies Declare Cyber War on Independent Media
unlimitedhangout.com / 11 Nov 2020
British and American state intelligence agencies are “weaponizing truth” to quash vaccine hesitancy (A: I’ve said this many times before.) as both nations prepare for mass inoculations, in a recently announced “cyber war” to be commanded by (A: Artificial intelligence.) AI-powered arbiters of truth against information sources that challenge official narratives.
(A: Now, there’s a free society for you, eh. So
they declare a war on the public, and anyone that challenges the official
narratives. There’s a free society.
That’s the kind of stuff you would always point to other countries, oh
see, look, they’re doing it over there in these tyrannical countries. Here it
is HERE, folks. It’s the same thing.)
In just the past week, the national-security states of the United States and United Kingdom have discreetly let it be known that the cyber tools and online tactics previously designed for use in the post-9/11 “war on terror” are now being repurposed for use against information sources promoting “vaccine hesitancy”
(A: And it goes
into it too, Warp Speed and all the rest of it.)
UK Intelligence’s New Cyberwar Targeting “Anti-Vaccine Propaganda”
(A; Again, it
mentions the Times reports and so on, the newspaper. The links are all here for it and contained
in this article. It mentions again…)
… the British military’s 77th Brigade, which specializes in “information warfare,”
(A: Yeah, generally in other countries, folks, and
they’ve been using on their own public. Wasn't it freedom of speech, that old
farce of a line they used to give you in Britain, we're a free country,
we gave democracy to the world.
M-hm. There ya go. So they're...)
…not only take down “anti-vaccine propaganda” but will also seek to “disrupt the operations of the cyberactors responsible for it,
(A: They call it cyberacters.)
including encrypting their data so they cannot access it and blocking their communications with each other.”
(A: Do you understand, this is the stuff all the,
that we’ve been warned about hackers, this is your own governments doing it,
folks. Because they’ve been doing it across the world. Where do you think all
these folk who learned it across the world got it from? From your government
agencies. That are now using it on you. M-hm-hm. And they’re using…)
…the “Five Eyes” alliance (US, Australia, New Zealand and Canada)
(A: …and there’s other ones apart from that too,
mind you. To take you all down, eh. So you're not allowed your own opinion
anymore. They've set warfare departments
against you. They've declared war on
you. It says, oh, the Times, says it's troubling, you see…)
This is highly troubling given that the US recently seized the domains of many sites, including the American Herald Tribune, which it erroneously labeled as “Iranian propaganda,” (A: [Alan chuckles.]) despite its editor in chief, Anthony Hall, being based in Canada. The US government made this claim about the American Herald Tribune after the cybersecurity firm FireEye, a US government contractor, stated that it had “moderate confidence” that the site had been “founded in Iran.”
(A: …moderate confidence.)
In addition, the fact that GCHQ has alleged that most of the sites it plans to target are “linked to Moscow” (A: Come on!) gives further cause for concern given that the UK government was caught funding the Institute for Statecraft’s Integrity Initiative, which falsely labeled critics of the UK government’s actions as well as its narratives with respect to the Syria conflict as being related to “Russian disinformation” campaigns.
(A: [Alan
laughing.])
No it’s, they’re at war with you, people. It’s
got all the links on it to what they’re talking about here in the article. Again, which is the way it should be, so it’s
not just made-up nonsense, it’s got a lot of good information on it.
But yeah, this is the end of any free society,
any modicum of a free society, this is the end of it. We never really had free
societies. Not completely free. I mean, true free societies would be anarchy,
and that's the fact of it too. Because
true anarchy would have no authority at all, you see, you can't get any
further right wing than that, the abolition of it. And some of the old
anarchists used to, they used to preach that too, that just... That's where
even the saying came from too, don't
tread on me, with the snake and so on. That's symbology, it was, I won't
bother you if you won't bother me. You know? That was the idea of real
independent anarchy. Not these managed anarchists that are part of again a
government-funded psyop, you know, irregular warfare.
Anti-Lockdown
Protests All Across Europe
off-guardian.org / 19 Nov 2020
Increasingly draconian lockdown measures, economic destitution, and sweeping police powers are evaporating public trust and eroding public patience.
And sure enough, I mean, last week you had lots
of demonstrations going on across the European countries. Very quiet in Canada
and the States, I think anyway. Unless I've missed something maybe, because
it's possible, I don't watch TV. So I don't really know. They had some smaller
protests in Canada. Doug Ford in Ontario…
Doug Ford slams
anti-lockdown protesters outside his home as ‘buffoons’
theglobeandmail.com / 27 Nov 2020
(A: That's very
descriptive, they're buffoons. He
doesn't go into the point of their anger, naturally, just calls them nasty
names like buffoons.)
The Covid 19 vaccine will bring life back to normal.
(A: Now, the people who've, I just read the
articles, you just have to wear a mask and be 6 feet apart and all the rest of
it. So he's not telling you, he's speaking an untruth I would say, in their
terminology, you know. They don't say lies, they say untruths.)
Doug Ford warns of possible lockdown new restrictions as Ontario's Covid 19 cases rise.
(A: Because
they're testing more people, you see. Yep.
But they're buffoons. Yep. There
ya go.)
And the New York Times talks about…
Iran’s Top
Nuclear Scientist Killed in Ambush, State Media Say
nytimes.com / 27 Nov 2020
(A: So it's,
yeah, it's on the go there. A brazen killing.)
The scientist, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, believed to be 59, has been considered the driving force behind Iran’s nuclear weapons program for two decades, and continued to work after the main part of the effort was quietly disbanded in the early 2000s, according to American intelligence assessments and Iranian nuclear documents stolen by Israel.
One American official — along with two other intelligence officials — said that Israel was behind the attack on the scientist.
I remember a few years ago they were doing that
too, with the sticky bombs they call them, something that was invented I think
in World War II, and against, for tanks. You would basically pull the wrapper
off the thing and, it was like, it looks like a ball with a stick on it really,
but there’s sticky goo on the outside. You just whack it against the side of
the tank for instance after you pulled the pin and ran and it would blow up,
you see, it would stick to the tank. But a few years ago they were doing that
with cars, and it was thought to be, well, it was agencies, again, from
outside. Israel and so on would go into
Iran and blow up different scientists who were in some of the cars. These guys
with the sticky bombs would be driving motorbikes and whack, just stick it to
it, bomf, and boom, up it went. So it’s
ongoing of course, ongoing, ongoing. But that’s another one killed.
But I really, you really smell the stepping up of
the same wars again too. With all the
rhetoric back about Russia. And we're all cozying up again to China. Because after all, China is the model state
for the world, right. And it's got big, big money and it can help any friends
financially, you know. There you go. But
you can really smell it coming, don't you, the whole agenda.
And from the World Economic Forum…
Building Back
Better: An Action Plan for the Media, Entertainment and Culture Industry
weforum.org
(A: Their white
paper. That was July of course. But building back better. B-B-B. Yep. A stronger ecosystem, and so on. Yeah.
All planned out for you. You didn't have to do any work at all. They've
done it all for you. Your whole future is planned there, yeah.)
Practical actions for advertisers, publishers, agencies, and platforms to improve the media ecosystems.
(A: It's an
ecosystem, you know.)
in this phase of building back better post Covid 19.
(A: Ahhhhhhhhhh,
better, better. New is good, you know, new is good. Buy new.)
And also, I'll just touch on the next
article very shortly. But first I want to say again, cuttingthroughthematrix.com. Help
me tick along here as we go through all the chaos that we're going through and
the chaos to come. Because there's a lot
more they've got planned for you, believe it or not. I'm not kidding you. If
you think the present year restrictions are insane...
You understand, I mentioned before how they
did it with depatterning, they called it, for MK Ultra and [Ewen] Cameron the
guy who was appointed to oversee it. He also belonged to the CIA. The CIA has people in all countries, you know, they
put them on the paycheck and that's it. Cameron of course got, and he couldn't get
away with what he did without permission from the Canadian government too. They used a lot of the psychiatric hospitals
across Britain and elsewhere for all these experiments, you know. Big experiments.
What he would do was bring in patients of
course, oh you're depressed, oh don't worry about it, we'll give you 100, 200
ECT shocks, electro convulsive therapy, LSD galore, and give you mass day and
night music or instructions, vocal, on tape, that you couldn't switch off, you
couldn't move your hands up to pull the thing off your head or anything like
that. We'll eradicate all your previous
memory and reprogram you. Repatterning they called it.
They use psychic
driving, the repetition of the same things over and over. The same kind of thing you got with 9/11 with the same planes going
into the tower, planes going into the tower, planes going into the tower,
planes going into the tower, over and over again for weeks and weeks and weeks.
Psychic driving. That's what they do. And the same narratives. Osama bin Laden,
Osama bin Laden, Osama bin Laden, Osama bin Laden, yada, ya. Same thing, weapons of mass destruction,
weapons of mass destruction, weapons of mass destruction. Same kind of stuff,
you see. That's what they call psychic driving.
Now it's Covid 19, Covid 19, Covid 19. And lockdown, lockdown, lockdown. Obey, obey, obey, is a big one of course for
repatterning. Then you get to do dumb
things, and how many folk you can have on a Saturday compared to a Thursday or
a Friday or Monday in your home and yada, yada, yada, ya. And I'm just starting. Because you see, once
you go off the rails of sanity, and their Pavlovian trick, you know, of obeying
and then getting shocked again. And
before you have a total breakdown they have to, it gets easier to get you to do
stupid things and crazy things. Easier and easier. Because you're getting off
of normal common sense.
Common sense is a very important thing that
you take for granted. Have you seen what they do in the stores with the
Perspex? What do you think? I mean, the air goes around the side of the
Perspex, it goes over the top of it. The
little bit holding the bottom for the hands to go through for cash or credit
card, it goes through. Iiiiiiit's ridiculous. It's a physical symbol of
something else. And the person behind it is wearing a mask. You're wearing a mask. And you've got a
half-inch thick Perspex thing between you.
And you're saying, mmmmm-mmmm-mmmm-mmmm, wwwwwww, mmmmmm, wwwwwmmm,
wmmm. And they look puzzled and,
wwwwwaaaa, rrrrrrr, yyyyyyy. Then you're getting flustered, aaaaarrrrrrrrrr,
weerrrrrrrrrrr, rrrrrrrrrrmmmmmmm, rmmm.
And of course they pull their mask down and say something, oh yeah,
okay. Or they go to the side, around the
side of the Perspex, which is about 6 inches further, and then they speak to
you normally, okay, yeah, yeah.
It's
all intended to create maximum FRUSTRATION. That's
its purpose. And as you get frustrated and angry, it's training you to
QUENCH your ANGER and deal with it and contain it. You know anger is a
kind of a natural response to absurd situations. Anger is a
self-preservation mechanism in the right circumstances. You're being trained to
SUPPRESS it. So they increase it, and they train you to
suppress it.
Do you understand what's happening? Repatterning
of behavior. It's all happening. Pavlov's dog.
Shock, shock, until you get a breakdown, shock, shock, shock. Yep. Be
good, be a good little dog, stand over there and get your dinner. Then you do
it and do it, and suddenly you get shocked one day, and you have a breakdown,
you're doing the right thing, isn't that what I was supposed to do, wasn't it
master? You know?
This is massive, MASSIVE psychological
WARFARE. As I've said before, you have all kinds of behaviorists and experts.
It's interesting how, hhhch, someone that was pushing nothing but voting for
the last few years, is a front, goes back on track after it's all over with
Trump, and just is repeating my stuff verbatim, hhhch, to try and get some
credence back. I get a chuckle out of that one too. Yeah, you get all kinds of experts.
Psychologist, behaviorists, and neuroscientists. On board working against us
all. To again, break down.
What do you think rebuilding is? Rebuilding
is destroying existing, that's your sanity. It isn't just rebuilding society by itself.
You've got to destroy it first, then you rebuild it. Are you getting the
picture? It's awfully important that, rebuilding, then you rebuild. You breakdown, in the patterning behavior,
you breakdown, eradicate, you WIPE THE MIND of memories, and then you
reprogram that with new memories, new normals, new everything, you see, new
ways of behavior. That's rebuilding back better, you see. Building back better.
Repatterning. Meaning training you to be a different kind of human. More
compliant. Obedient, absolutely. By
suppressing your frustrations, which lead to anger. Suppressing your righteous
anger, that's how you do it, folks.
Now, we're talking about cyber war and the
psyops as well, all combined. Your tax money and the Five Eyes attacking them,
all the people who really are noticing inconsistencies in the mainstream
propaganda. Of course that's how black
mark would call them, you know, their articles, propaganda. As they call you a propagandist for noticing
their articles as you counter it. This is warfare, you see. The dark arts as they call it, eh.
This article here is from, long article by
the way, it's a 240-page article from the Department of Defense. It does touch
on it at the beginning of this chapter, chapter 1, a little bit about the backgrounds
of the methods that will be used.
FM 3-05.130
Army Special
Operations Forces
Unconventional
Warfare
September 2008
UNCONVENTIONAL WARFARE
1-6. The United States is not unpracticed in using many of these methods. It is accustomed to wielding (A: This is unconventional warfare.) all instruments of national power. (A: Right.)
At the dawn of the 21st century, the United States still enjoys the largest economy in the world (A: That was then, eh, a few years ago.) and continues to wield enormous economic and financial influence.
(A: So then it
goes into...)
The reach of all these instruments is paralleled by intelligence and law-enforcement instruments that provide constant feedback of information and respect for international codes of behavior.
1-7. Failing a peaceful resolution of international competition, the United States has a tested military capability to use UW. Although such special operations (SO) are inherently joint missions of the USSOCOM, the capability has traditionally and primarily resided in ARSOF. The spiritual forbearers of American UW can be traced to the colonial period. ARSOF has a direct military lineage of conducting UW, which dates back more than 50 years to the World War II (WWII) Office of Strategic Services (OSS). The United States has conducted UW in support of resistance movements, insurgencies,
(A: Now, this is important. Because if you study into it, you'll find really the whole idea of the riots and demonstrations were part of insurgencies, standard color revolutions.)
and ongoing or pending conventional military operations. It has operated by, with, or through irregular forces against a variety of state and nonstate opponents. Such sensitive operations are a high-value component and a specific application of the military instrument of national power. ARSOF UW—properly employed within the context of all such power effectively integrated—is more relevant than ever in the 21st century international environment.
(A: Then they go
into a bit of history of unconventional warfare, how …)
1-8. UW originated with the creation of the OSS (A: That's the precursor to the CIA.) during WWII.
UW was generally defined in terms of guerrilla and covert operations in enemy-held or -influenced territory.
In 1951, the Army’s UW assets were consolidated under the Office of Psychological Warfare, and the Army published the first two field manuals for the conduct of SO (with an emphasis on UW). By 1955, the first historical manual that specifically linked Army SF to UW (FM 31-20, Special Forces Group) declared, “UW consists of the three interrelated fields of guerrilla warfare (GW), escape and evasion, and subversion against hostile states.”
1-9. In the subsequent Cold War decades, the definition expanded and contracted, verbiage changed, and missions conceived as a part of this unconventional enterprise were added or subtracted. The common conceptual core has nevertheless remained as working by, with, or through irregular surrogates
(A: And this is
important, right.)
...working with, by, or through irregular surrogates in a clandestine and/or covert manner against opposing actors.
(A: Do you
realize they go into other countries that have middle classes and working
classes and so on, and they’ll find other forces or irregular forces, or create
them, right, or create alliances with them.)
...surrogates in a clandestine and/or covert manner against opposing actors.
(A: They use them
against the populations. That's what you saw I think with all these
demonstrations in the States, and during a whole Covid pandemic supposedly. And
the lockdown. Then they decided to go after police shooting and killing black
people. Why then? And why these Antifa ones suddenly there? ...leading the
group's of the Black Lives Matter? It was mainly white, Antifa. This is
warfare. This is psyops and it's also subversive techniques that they've used
in color revolutions across the world. We've seen it for years. Yp.)
(A: So you
understand the terminology here, the opposing actors are the Americans,
basically, the population of the US. That's what they're using it on. And going
into restaurants and yelling at people and going down neighborhoods and
screaming at folk and threatening to burn them down and so on. So the current definition...)
At present, the current definition of unconventional warfare is as follows: operations conducted by, with or through irregular forces in support of a resistance movement or insurgency or conventional military operations.
(A: That was from
Unconventional Warfare, September 20, 2007.)
This definition reflects two essential criteria: UW must be conducted by, with, or through surrogates; and such surrogates must be irregular forces.
(A: What is it they kept telling you about Antifa? It’s not a real organized group. It’s just, you know, different people that
join; this is what they kept telling you.
You could see their leaders [Alan chuckles.] who were well-funded, and
we know that from CIA, etc. and there’s certain characters in it.)
1-10 Moreover, this definition is consistent with the historical reasons that the United States has conducted UW. UW has been conducted in support of both an insurgency, such as the Contras in 1980s Nicaragua, and resistance movements to defeat an occupying power, such as the Mujahideen in 1980s Afghanistan. UW has also been conducted in support of pending or ongoing conventional military operations; for example, OSS/Jedburgh activities in France and OSS/Detachment 101 activities in the Pacific in WWII and, more recently, SF operations in Operation ENDURING FREEDOM (A: Enduring freedom. Remember, hhhch, as they, we were bombing Afghanistan.) (OEF)/Afghanistan in 2001 and Operation IRAQI FREEDOM (A: That was a good one too. Yep, Iraqi Freedom, as they put it into the stone age.) (OIF)/Iraq in 2003. Finally and in keeping with the clandestine and/or covert nature of historical UW operations, it has involved the conduct of classified surrogate operations. Details of classified operations are in FM 3-05.20, (C) Special Forces Operations (U), and FM 3-05.201.
1-11. The definition establishes a “litmus test” for clearly differentiating UW from other activities and clearly establishes the purpose for conducting UW. Including the idea of “by, with, or through surrogates” eliminates any confusion with unilateral direct action (DA), special reconnaissance (SR), or counterterrorism (CT) missions.
(A: We’ve got all
of it happening in North America, they sided with counterterrorism, didn’t it,
the war on terror.)
Identifying the historically demonstrated use of irregular forces as surrogates in the definition eliminates any confusion with foreign internal defense (FID) or coalition activities using regular forces. The clearly stated purpose of UW to support insurgencies, resistance movements, and conventional military operations not only eliminates the possibility of incorrectly characterizing UW as solely an IW activity but also articulates UW’s relevance to the Army and joint force by specifying support to other operations.
(A: Now, to most
folk this is going to be awfully, awfully boring, so I won’t do it all
naturally, because it's 240 pages, or 248 pages. But it does go into irregular
forces, and it gives you classifications and clarifications of the different
kinds of forces that they use. Also asymmetric warfare, unrestricted warfare,
fourth generation warfare, and so on. But it really goes into it deeper down in
chapter 4 and so on with different techniques of going into countries, finding
discontented groups, arming them, train them, and backing them. And if they don't exist to basically create
them, you know. It doesn't matter, you see, most followers don't have to really
understand the big picture. They just get the basic propaganda and they join
in, they join on, you know. That's what you saw in the streets in the States
there too. They joined it, discontented youngsters, because they see no future.
But they didn't know the big, they didn't know they were getting used. Hhhch.
And they'll never know that probably.)
(A: It gives the
irregular warfare joint operating concept of it, 2007, and it describes what
traditional warfare is, right. It's rather obvious what it is and what its
purpose is by the different groups involved.)
IRREGULAR WARFARE
1-17. For some, the emerging concept of IW risks adding further confusion to what is unconventional in warfare.
(A: Then they
differentiate irregular warfare from conventional warfare and unconventional
and so on. So they give you the state and nonstate actors...)
1-19. JP 1-02 defines IW as “a violent struggle among state and nonstate actors for legitimacy and influence over the relevant populations.
(A: I’ll say that again. Just think back to the
summer here of discontent, where during a pandemic, supposedly, it’s decided
then, it even came out in the manual for Antifa that they look for sparks basically for heightened emotion and then jump
on the bandwagon. So they use the Black Lives Matter group and then
jumped on the back of that, and to get prominence, and went on a rampage as you
well know. I’ll say this part again, right, this is…)
1-19. JP 1-02 defines IW as “a violent struggle among state and nonstate actors for legitimacy and influence over the relevant populations.
(A: Who, were they your champion or your
persecutors during the lockdowns when the people in the streets were burning
your places down and so on? And many folk joined it thinking they were, oh,
this is the thing to do, yeah.)
IW favors indirect and asymmetric approaches, though it may employ the full range of military and other capacities in order to erode an adversary’s power, influence, and will.” IW is inherently a protracted conflict that will test the resolve of the United States and its partners. Adversaries will pursue IW strategies, employing a hybrid of irregular, disruptive, traditional, and catastrophic capabilities to undermine and erode the influence and will of the United States and its strategic partners. Meeting these challenges and combating this approach will require the concerted efforts of all instruments of U.S. national power.
(A: Well, they say the US has been using the same
technique across the world. In fact, they’re the ones who perfected it all
really. Over many years. But you read about it, and you simply realize that all
this is getting used inside America. Now it’s being used all across the
Internet naturally. Right down to doing what they said they do, which is
stopping the communications of people who speak out against activities. They
get banned. This is warfare. This is
military psyops. And it’s military cyber
warfare. And it’s all in this massive
thing here.)
(A: They've got
their diagrams of how it works, and how they're always fighting for the minds
of the bulk of the population, or even countries that they're taking over
you're seeing the same thing happened too. Look what happened in the States too
during it all. There were people in white neighborhoods putting Black Lives
Matter signs in their windows thinking, hoping that they would be accepted as
being on board with them and they wouldn't get their homes burned down. In
Black Lives Matter and so on. Battle for the minds of the people. And the folk
that cave-in and go along with. You see
how it all works?)
(A: This is all
well understood. Well understood, yep, how to silence adversaries and so
on. During the regular warfare and major combat operations are different,
that's street stuff. Unconventional warfare and...)
Stability, security, transition, and reconstruction
(A: What are you
going through right now with the build back better? People are in shock from the Covid pandemic,
lockdowns, the total collapse, planned destruction of societies economic system
for all small businesses, which were the majority of businesses by the way. And
lockdowns and so on. And they want to come out of it. But they're not to go
back to what was. So they have...)
Stability, security, transition, and reconstruction
(A: What does it
say at the World Economic Forum, build back better.)
Stability, security, transition, and reconstruction
(A: There you
go. Is it starting to come together,
folks? I could go on and on and on naturally because it's a massive article.
Also, they have counter insurgencies.
It's interesting.)
Counterinsurgency: Those political, economic, military, paramilitary, psychological, and civil actions taken by a government to defeat an insurgency.
(A: What do you
do when your government IS the insurgency? ...or what you think is your
government anyway, or those who control the government? What do you do then,
eh? But this article goes on, and I think in chapter 4 they go into more to do
with special forces. They use lots of ex-mil... well, guys who are really on
the payroll, but they're really classified as private companies now and special
forces that deal with it all. That's what most of your cyber warfare is to do
with that too. But so much of this is to do with techniques, you see, and how
they have...)
planning and direction
evaluation and feedback
collection
dissemination and integration
processing and exploitation
analysis and production
(A: ...in their
mission, it's all done beforehand, you see. And it's so easy in real time now.
And how to get into anybody's Internet system, altar and then persuade them, or
alter their perceptions of things without them even knowing it's happening.)
(A: So what do you
do when your own military system is turned against you? the people who
pay their paychecks, the taxpayers? And they go into the "financial
instruments of national power", you know. Which can give you the
prosperity and stability in the States.
But what they're really saying is, it's the same in other countries
too. You go after the financial system. In other words, you can create financial
collapses, naturally, sure. Alter their
medium of exchange, lower the value of their currency. It's all part of warfare, for those who don't
know it. All contained in here too.)
(A: Even your law
enforcement now is a member of international, not just national power but
international power.)
2-50. As globalization increases world integration, the scope of threats to U.S. security and public safety becomes more global. The law enforcement instrument increasingly and necessarily works outside of U.S. borders to combat these threats.
(A: Interesting,
and now your military is working inside your own country, as the cops are
working outside of it. But there's so much you can really take in here. They
also have lots of people on the payroll as assets, the CIA, most people
are assets actually as you probably know. Or they work part-time, hhhch,
they're contract for CIA and intelligence agencies, you activate them at the
right times. But they have doctors, they have lawyers galore, all on board with
this, folks. Scientists, people who have got a say in the public forum on
science. All assets too. Are you
starting to get the picture of what runs you now?)
(A: You're
authorized statements, regardless of many other people who are not members of
the club, but who have maybe even better qualifications in sciences that are
mentioned, and they get pooh-poohed and knocked down. Mostly they're not
members of, they're not assets, they're not members or contract employees.)
(A: As I'm
reading this article you realize that everything's a farce, isn't it. It's all
noble languages used here and there, and noble terminologies to do with, for
example it says…)
Applicability of National Policy to Army Special Operations Forces Unconventional Warfare
(A: And it gives
you an example of the...)
3-18. The NSS states that U.S. policy is “to seek and support democratic movements and
institutions in every nation and culture” and identifies that this bold and noble policy is “the work of generations.”
“to seek and support democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture”
(A: And they’re
being turned upon the people, who are trying to use their freedom of speech, to
silence their freedom of speech. It's
like the BeeGee's song, words are all I
have. Words eventually mean
nothing. Hhhch. Words are all I have. Because evil intentions runs the world,
especially with law, eh, the terminology. And they give you wonderful
platitudes, oh, and mottos. It says here
the special forces motto...)
SF motto “to free the oppressed.”
(A: ...to free
the oppressed. To free the oppressed. Have you looked around the world? Have
you looked at the devastation since 9/11 happened? To countries across
different parts of the world? …free the oppressed.)
“to free the oppressed.” The seeking out and supporting of democratic movements—even within nondemocratic state regimes—imply the utility of ARSOF UW in denied, hostile, and sensitive areas. The focused persistence required for a generational effort is consistent with the long-term shaping, political work, and partner organization-building fundamental to understanding UW.
(A: Mind you, and
they also use stacks and stacks of nongovernmental organizations by the way.
Across the world. But this is a very interesting manual basically. And…)
Ranges of military operations
(A: Let me think
now, here are some of the goals, and external factors, in chapter 4. It
says…)
4-6. Planners must understand the U.S. military command relationships (Service and joint, military and interagency) that may affect ARSOF elements and supported irregular forces. In addition, planners must understand the—
- Scope and limitations of each agency’s influence and programs.
- Legal and political restrictions on ARSOF activities.
(A: Well, they’ve
already been given a wide range in the Americas by their own governments, eh.)
- Sources and assistance available to ARSOF to further assure mission accomplishment.
- Role of the U.S. media and the international press.
(A: …is essential for warfare purposes. I say that again…)
- Role of the U.S. media and the international press.
(A: Hm.)
- Intent and goals
of the USG. (A: US government.)
- Intent and goals of NGOs (A: Nongovernmental organizations.), humanitarian relief organizations, and other key civilian agencies in the UWOA.
- Command relationships of international agencies and NGOs with representatives of the USG.
- Intent and goals of international agencies (such as the United Nations [UN] or North Atlantic Treaty Organization [NATO]).
- Applicable ROE (A:
…and so on.)
(A: But anyway, the main part is, you got to have
the media on board with you, and the international press as well. And...)
RECOGNIZE POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS
ENGAGE THE THREAT DISCRIMINATELY
4-13. The third component of engaging threats discriminately deals with tactical considerations. ARSOF must carefully target tactical operations in UW to ensure success and avoid alienating the civilian population.
(A: This
is almost like psyops and cyber warfare, eh, propaganda, etc. And…)
CONSIDER THE LONG-TERM EFFECTS
(A: It's a battle
like they said before for the population and for their minds. Which leads to at
least to a form of allegiance, at least compliance, you see. So they'll use
inside your own nation the pros and cons. If there's division there, they'll
pick the sides they want to win and give them more credence, apparent credence
over the other ones. It might not be legitimate, the credence part of it that
is, or true. It's what appears to be true. It's all perception
management, you see.)
ANTICIPATE AND CONTROL PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS
4-17. All operations and activities in a UW environment have significant psychological effects. Combat operations and civic action programs are two examples of the type of operations or activities with obvious psychological effects. ARSOF must strive to ensure that all audiences understand operations. Losing control of perceptions (A: You see, perception management.) may result in a distortion of facts and may even diminish or destroy the gains of even superbly planned and executed missions.
What they are trying to do too in countries
that they go into is find out leaders that are opposed to them, the forces
coming in, right. Then you find ways to
discredit those leaders in the eyes of the public. Well, that's the same as the
psyops they do inside your own nation's.
That's what they're doing now. That's what the governments have said,
hhhch, in the mainstream articles, is that they've declared war upon their own
people is.
This is a dangerous thing to have, folks.
Dangerous, dangerous. Youngsters, often, that they employ for it too, they've
been brought up playing video games and all they know is that they want to win,
they don't care who they destroy. Even their own people. They probably really
don't feel any connection with you anyway. Even though you're paying their
salaries. [Alan chuckles.] Dangerous,
dangerous policy altogether.
But this article here shows all the
different resources they have and who they work with, and how they create
different groups within countries, and control psychological effects of
populations, etc. Interesting. You see, you're under a war at the moment,
using, you know, the general emergency powers acts and so on. Which is War Powers Act, or martial law as
it's commonly called. And they're using the military against their own
population. It's rather sad, isn't it, it's come to this. But it’s an all or nothing agenda by those
who decide that they have the right to rule the planet. Nevermind just own it, they want to also have
the right to decide how it's going to be run, minutely, down to the individual
level. That's what it's all about, folks.
So it's kind of sad that most folk don't
know what's really happening. The mainstream media is on board with the
military obviously. As I say, you must
always... And they had that in the Event 201, where they admitted they already
had all the social platforms and the media on board with them, in the practice
event, never mind the real thing. It's all prearranged, you see.
That's why top scientists in their fields
who have even better, for qualifications, than the characters that are giving
you the authorized versions of the pandemic.
These other scientists with the better credentials, and who are working
with patients are completely dismissed out of hand. That's totalitarian, you
see. That's military, that's what the military would do.
Because you see, they're building back
better project for the World Economic Forum, Mr. Klaus Schwab, has to be rammed
through. All post-Democratic, as I've
said long ago, because you don't vote for any of these characters. You don't
vote for the UN. You don't vote for Schwab or the World Economic Forum. You
certainly don't vote for the Army, hhhch, and whatever they get up to. They are given orders by those who rule you. I
say rule, rather than govern. Because
this is rulership. Governing is a different thing legally than rulership. Well,
you're under rulership now, you see. That's what you're going through.
Anyway remember folks, you can help me tick
along here. Cuttingthroughthematrix.com. We're living through sad times
indeed, where your own tax money is paying not just to invade other countries
for warfare purposes, or material resources or whatever, but also being used
against your own populations.
Dangerous times. And yet you'll probably all
go and vote again, eh? For a system that doesn’t represent you, obviously.
Rather sad that.
So help me tick along. Cuttingthroughthematrixcom. Send a few bucks my way, hopefully, and
I'll try and keep the gears moving at my end of it. And stay, stay the course because it's not
over yet. Until the grossly obese, morbid obesity person sings, as they say.
I'm very PC tonight. That's just the way it is.
For myself Alan Watt, from Ontario, Canada,
it's good night and may God or your gods go with you.
Topics of show covered in following
links:
Technocracy And
The Great Reset - Patrick Wood and James Delingpole
bitchute.com / 28 Nov 2020
Ankle bracelets,
testing on-board sewage for coronavirus and NO boarding without a vaccine:
Qantas CEO Alan Joyce reveals the very strict rules Aussies will have to follow
just to fly overseas
dailymail.co.uk / 23 Nov 2020
Tighter tier
restrictions could 'spell the end of the traditional British pub'
manchestereveningnews.co.uk / 23 Nov 2020
Scotland becomes
the first country in the world to pass landmark legislation offering free
period products to anyone who needs them
dailymail.co.uk / 24 Nov 2020
Scotland becomes
first country in the world to make sanitary products free for women
zeenews.india.com / 25 Nov 2020
Can I stay
overnight with family in Tier 2 or Tier 3 this Christmas?
express.co.uk / 27 Nov 2020
Level 3 of the
'Plan for Living with Covid-19' explained
independent.ie / 24 Nov 2020
Fury as 20million
Brits are forced into Tier 3 despite R rate below 1
thesun.co.uk / 26 Nov 2020
Moderna vaccine
‘may not stop people spreading Covid’
metro.co.uk / 25 Nov 2020
The Johns
Hopkins, CDC Plan to Mask Medical Experimentation on Minorities as “Racial
Justice”
unlimitedhangout.com / 25 Nov 2020
China Wants
Passenger Tracking System for Global Travel Coronavirus Reset
breitbart.com / 23 Nov 2020
The COVID-19
RT-PCR Test: How to Mislead All Humanity. Using a “Test” To Lock Down Society
globalresearch.ca / 5 Nov 2020
GCHQ in cyberwar
on anti-vaccine propaganda
thetimes.co.uk / 9 Nov 2020
GCHQ spies launch
cyber counter-attack against anti-vaccine propaganda being spread by Russia
dailymail.co.uk / 8 Nov 2020
Canada blocks
bulk exports of some prescription drugs in response to Trump import plan
msn.com / 29 Nov 2020
US – UK Intel
Agencies Declare Cyber War on Independent Media
unlimitedhangout.com / 11 Nov 2020
Anti-Lockdown
Protests All Across Europe
off-guardian.org / 19 Nov 2020
Doug Ford slams anti-lockdown
protesters outside his home as ‘buffoons’
theglobeandmail.com / 27 Nov 2020
Iran’s Top
Nuclear Scientist Killed in Ambush, State Media Say
nytimes.com / 27 Nov 2020
Building Back
Better: An Action Plan for the Media, Entertainment and Culture Industry
weforum.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering
Information: |
|||
"Cutting Through" |
& |
"Waiting for the
Miracle....." |
|
Ancient Religions and History MP3
CDs: |
& |
Blurbs and
'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc) |
|
"Reality
Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom,
Esoterica and ...TIME" |