May 12, 2019 (#1720)
"Cutting Through the Matrix" with Alan
Watt
(Blurb, i.e. Educational Talk)
"With Scientific Tyranny over You and Me,
The Future
Ain't What it Used to Be."
© Alan Watt May 12, 2019
*Title & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - May
12, 2019 (Exempting Music and Literary Quotes)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDRESS: CTTM
P.O. Box 815
Keene, TX
76059 USA
EMAIL: alanwattcuttingthrough@yahoo.com
(Because of bombardment
of Trojans and Downloader Viruses and Spyware, will be deleting ALL mail
containing attachments.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE OFFICIAL WEBSITES OF
ALAN WATT
cuttingthroughthematrix.com,
cuttingthroughthematrix.net,
cuttingthroughthematrix.us,
alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca
MIRROR SITE
cuttingthrough.jenkness.com
INTERNATIONAL AND
MULTILINGUAL SITE
alanwattsentientsentinel.eu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The
Matrix on May 12, 2019. I suppose
everyone's settling back into the... the new system, the new chapter as I call
it, of the same system really but it's a new chapter for sure, with an
upgrading of it's agenda, techniques, etc., for this new era we're in. Because
the whole century is divided up into chapters. The same with Agenda 21, for the
21st century. It's all in chapters, 2015, 2030, etc., and that's how it's done.
That's how it is all done of course. Just
like the UN had 100-year plans and 50-year plans and 40-year plans. We've got all these different chapters, or
plans, for the whole of the century. And they've been quite blatant about them,
there's no secrecy really involved about where you have to
be taken, and lead, in this whole century and the changes that have to be made.
And you're going to accept it, whether you like it or not. It's rather blatant
about that too.
Because the whole world is to change. The whole world, remember, is to change, not
just your nation, into a global system run with the same agendas basically.
Slight variations according to time for different countries because of their
economics and because of their climate and all the rest of it. But it's the
same agenda for the whole century. And they must get this accomplished.
Of course, as I’ve mentioned many times before
that everything that's happening now is a crisis, you
see. And under the guise of crisis, whether it's terrorism or climate change or
global warming or whatever they want to call it, it's all your fault. And you have to go along with it because crisis gives them necessity. And necessity is the excuse
they use to take your rights away from you and force you along in this
system.
This system eventually will be cashless,
completely. It must be, you see, to
control everybody. Because money is a control mechanism. If you
can't get it you're going to starve to death. And if it's all electronic you won't be able
to even use cash, you won't get cash, it won't be accepted. And if you're being punished in some way, and
this is the whole system now, is punishing you for any wrongdoing or not going
along with the agenda, then they'll withhold your funds until you knuckle under
and accept whatever it is that you've railed against. Quite easy to get you in line. If you can't
feed yourself or if you can’t get accommodation to live under and keep you warm
and out of the elements, then you'll suffer obviously. Many ways to get you, in fact. And that is
the way of the future. It's already here actually. But you'll see it increasing very quickly as
time goes on.
Because as you've noticed across the world
everyone's becoming aware, with trepidation, of the system changing. It's not
pally anymore, you might say. And you're being warned and cautioned, etc., as a
prelude to what's to come. Because speech now is apparently dangerous. It
depends what you're using it for and what you trying to express.
You'll always find there's a deep state, they call
it the deep state today. But the deep state has always been here. Politics to a
very true extent, and good extent, politics is a front. I've said it before, it's for throwing rotten
tomatoes at it in a sense, and calling names at someone, and you vote them out
to get the next ones in who have promised you something better, you see. And
that's all they ever do is promise you. Because they know what the public are
talking about, complaining about, and they come out and promise you whatever
you want. They offer you utopia. And you go along with it. It never happens of
course and so you always try the next bunch.
Back and forth, back and forth like a ping-pong game basically. That's
what we're living in today.
But behind it all there's only one agenda and you
see it regardless of who appears to be in power. Look at all the different parties in the US
and Canada as an example. Nevermind the European Union and Britain. Canada and
the States and Mexico and some other countries by the way, and Latin America too,
starting with the free trade deal negotiations they called it, it took a long
time to get that all signed and so on. Then they went on to NAFTA and worked at
that for years. Presidents and prime
ministers all got together every year, still do, and they sign deeper
integration. Because the whole point is integration. Without any public input
into it.
Because it's the same agenda, exact, identical to
the European Union. How it's going to benefit us all, bring jobs, jobs,
jobs. But they didn't tell you, it was jobs
across the world. And of course too, it would be, everyone would benefit, etc.
This is a very old agenda. I won't go
into it again and reiterated again. It's very old. It's well documented. Karl
Marx talked about it. The ones who ran the British Empire, all the top
capitalists ranted on about it, how wonderful it would be. And the CFR draft it up here for the
Americas and boasted about it. And their
counterparts, or their affiliation in Britain, their parent company, you
might say, the private Royal Institute of International Affairs drafted
up for the European Union. So you have
private organizations running the world.
And you don't have a say in it.
I won't go into it again and again and again but
if you ever forget that, if you ever forget that regardless of who's in power,
or appears to be in power, why is it that the same agendas get further signed
in, further signed in, deeper and deeper and deeper, for maybe 40 years
sometimes? Like the European Union. Actually, 60 years for the European Union. The public didn't even know it was even going
on at the end of World War II. They were not
to be told until it was completed.
And when they were to be told anything it was, oh,
it's just a bit of free trade deal where we can negotiate things. That's what they were told. They weren't told
it was going to be integrated parliaments into one system. But that's what it is. And the same for the
Pacific Rim as well, that was to be another grouping as well. So we're well on our way. And it tells you, as I say, it’s not one
single party, left-wing, right-wing or middle or
whatever they want to call themselves, have come out and told you this, then they're
all in it together. Obviously.
Obviously.
But certainly, our public servants, but they're
not serving the public. They're serving somebody, and they already know it,
that there's a deep state, there's always been a deep state. In Britain, even
the writers, those who document the histories of Britain, including the
organization that ran the Empire and still does, they've still got a sort of an
empire there though it's fixed itself in with the US taking it over, it's all
one system. It runs the economical
system of the world, and also gives too many of its
top members the mineral rights, oil rights and everything else to its top
members across the planet as well. Because
they don't do it for… Believe you me, and there's no such thing as altruism
amongst them. They always put themselves across as being altruistic, as though
they’re born, really, they're sent by God to help poor mankind, you know, that's
how they put themselves across. They're
all incredibly rich at the top.
Incredibly. Many of them have titles, most of them do at the top, and
awards from all other countries for participating in the same global agenda.
It's a completely different world for them once they get into it. They even have their own videos out for their
own potential members, how to come into their organization and how they'll
benefit as the doors are opened for them.
It's astonishing.
Meanwhile at the bottom level we're given nothing
but fake history and who won this battle or that battle. In more recent times
we're told why we've gone into countries, to help them or democratize them and
all that nonsense, you know. And they call them peacekeepers as they go in
looking just like soldiers always looked. And how we're run by jingoism and
slogans all dreamed up by big marketing companies. And we are run that way. Massively so. The newspapers
use the massive marketing companies as well to try and get readership back in
them in an electronic age. They've been backed, again, by, they've been kept
afloat, lots of them, the top ones, with our tax money. Because
those who are authorized traditionally to tell the public what they're supposed
to be told – I won't say what they're supposed to really believe or know, what
we're supposed to be told – they're licensed and they already have the set up,
this discipline set up of management at the top going all the way down the tier
groups until... So it's more disciplined
than just some general thing that starts up, a wildcat company, you might
say. So it's important to have these
organizations, these institutions as they call themselves, still running the
show and telling us what more to know.
But they're using big marketing companies
to try and get readership in an electronic age. You'll find that they've
got psychologists, again, and neuroscientists and behaviorists
working with them all the time, who come in and tell you how to hook the
people into their sites. You'll notice some of the newspapers, actually lots of them have stacks of photographs and they
advertise, the money for any photographs of anything happening across the world
if you send them into them right away.
Because most of the things that happen in the world, to individual people,
like ourselves, really have very little effect on the
rest of the world's direction. And so, to an extent it's trivia but
they've got fantastic photographs to divert you off into this, that or
whatever. And always emotive topics
with them. They're called grabbers. And
often very different from the actual article if you go into read them. But they
use these techniques to get you in and to get you to read. If you read that
one, the next, there'll be something at the end of it, another photograph or
another big caption that grabs your attention to get you into it. Until they
want you to spend as much time as possible on their particular
site. Because they get lots of
money from advertisers.
You've got to
participate in your own deception. I've said this many times before. The same with
voting. You know this person is not it's going to bring in heaven and
utopia for you. I mean, surely you know that, right? So, you participate. The younger folk are trained to be radical
armies, almost in the Bolshevik fashion.
[Alan laughing.] And they are today.
In might touch on that later, I don't know. It's all organized that way from
the top.
But the rest of the public, they know. They know that you're not going to get a...
You know the real cost of living is going up and up and up, and the value of your
currency is dropping and dropping and dropping.
Because it's designed that way. You're living on debt. The country lives
on debt. Every note brought into existence, whether it's digital or paper or
plastic is still, it's still borrowed. It's borrowed from some group or
another, or private or whatever. But the fact is, it's debt money with built-in
inflation in it, you see. So you know whoever you vote in is not going to make
things better for you. You know the agenda is to get you off
of eating meat, for instance. Because it's part of…
That's what I'm saying, the whole agenda is one agenda. And all the things they
are telling you that you must do to save the world and the planet, are part of
the eugenics agenda as early as the 1920s. Even before that, in fact.
How to get the public to voluntarily reduce themselves. Well, you tell them,
it's because you're going to save them. You see? Isn't that beautiful? Isn't that fantastic? To save you all we've
got to make you do the very things that you wouldn't do voluntarily when we
just wanted to bring down the population, of all of you.
Isn't it beautiful, 'eh, how they always use the
same techniques? Because they work.
And during a wartime scenario, for instance, we don't mind as much... Oh, they're saving us from those nasty people
over yonder, you see. And therefore, you go on starvation diet if need be
for food. And you won't have the money
to purchase much at all so you can't buy all the little goodies, or even if you
could possibly even get them. And you
put up with hardship. You put up with everybody you know dying off, maybe even
yourself. Under the war situation. You get nothing out of it at the end of it of
course accept the debt. You're handed the bill. Because we still borrow money
to pay for all the armaments and things. But we put up with incredible
hardship... to be saved.
So use that scenario and bring it back under,
we're saving you all from destroying the planet. You are the enemy, but we're
saving you, the enemy, because you're destroying the planet. So you've got to
stop, cut back your numbers. Then you
won't be able to, you know... And they'll cut back your income. Cut back your
meat intake. Because protein's awfully
good for, that's why folk are living so long, so many people
actually. And they know this.
And then cut back energy, so you won't have all the piping and water and so on. The stuff that helps to eliminate diseases and so
on was running water and good sewage systems, etc. That's all to be cut back
and priced out of existence. In comes the diseases, in comes of the problems
and you start dying off.
But it's necessary to do that to save the planet,
you see. A war scenario. And folk will never figure it out [Alan chuckles.] that
it's the same folk behind it. And using all of our tax
money. It's fantastic what you can convince the public to go along with when
one system owns the entire system. One system owns all your… can actually… they
own your government, they are your
government, your government works for them, and they simply tax it all from you
to pay for it all. Isn't it beautiful?
Pretty good system, 'eh? You've got to admit it, it's a pretty good
system, for those that are in charge of it.
But the public are not to be told any truths
because it might spoil it. It's a great deception. But the world's pretty well
always been run by great deceptions. As I've said before, we even vote because
we like to be deceived. We participate in deception, our own deception. Of
course we do. Most folk go along with
deception because they're afraid not
to. That's part of it too. They're afraid, most folk are afraid, and they take
the easiest route in any decision like that. And the easiest route is pointed
out to them, take this route here, and they go along with it.
I remember reading from, I think it was one of
Solzhenitsyn's books, and also Gouzenko, Fall of a Titan,
excellent book to read actually, very important one. I think it was Gouzenko maybe who talked
about in the Soviet, early... He was a young child in the Soviet Union, and
they were in a country area, and they looked over a hill, and they used to
watch the prisoners being marched back to the prison camp after a day’s labor
in the Soviet Union. They said that what
struck them was that there was only two guards, one in
the front and one in the rear, with the prisoners, maybe 20 prisoners or more,
maybe even 40 sometimes. And they'd be in their drudgery, dredging along,
miserable as could be, half starved, cold and very weak, and occasionally
getting a kick for being slow or whatever, you know. And these two children
used to watch them every other day when they were up playing around on the
hill. One day they saw when they were dredging back, and a couple of people in
the group had decided to try and take these guards out. So they knocked them
down, disarmed them, and told to the rest of the prisoners, run, run, follow us and run. And none of them moved. None of them moved.
So the two guys eventually ran off in a certain direction they had
planned. They watched the rest of these
guys look stunned and look towards each other, and gradually some of them
started to walk back towards the camp, and the rest of them just followed suit.
That, you see, is human nature of the majority of the public. They will not take the chance.
Even if they're walking into certain destruction, and they’d get punished
anyway for two of them escaping, no doubt.
Or punished for letting it happen… because they didn't stop them. [Alan chuckles.] In other words, you can't win, you see. But fear
in itself overcame their survival instincts. Fear.
Fear of being caught and punished or tortured.
It's a good disincentive from trying to break out, isn't it?
Now, there's many techniques of punishment. And all law works by the initial coercion,
you're threatened, it can be very subtle initially. And most folk comply. Fill this in, you fill it in and away you go.
But if you don't comply then you'll get the next letter, which is more nasty. And you might get a knock on the door in fact.
So remember, that law runs on something called force. And police are a
force as well, don't forget it. They used to call them police services. But now they're called police forces. And it's being drummed into us
through all the movies you've watched and all the
television shows you've watched too. They even dress in black, which is the
executioners' uniform.
In Canada they used to wear the blue shirts,
light blue shirts. Nice and tidy. A lighter blue uniform, not quite navy blue
but a bit lighter. But a light-colored shirt.
And a different cap. And they didn't have their pants tucked in to
combat boots. There's a reason all this happens, and it happened in the 90s,
the 1990s, getting ready for what was to come. I did a show back then too
because I noticed the sudden transformation of it. They tried with a few
articles in the Toronto papers, for an example, of showing you public relations
photographs of the new police dressed in, but they had army fatigues on at the
time. And supposedly called out to deal with possible shots in Toronto, someone
heard shots or whatever. It looked to me at the time to be more of publicity
stunts to get you acclimatized to seeing them dressed in army uniforms, helmets
and all, and the same green combat gear.
But they decided it wasn't going down to well,
this association with military wasn't going down to well. They still wanted the
military association, but they changed it into literally the black outfits,
that were more a kin to the old German special forces
uniforms. And that's what they are. They've got the cap and the black tunic,
and the pants in the combat boots, etc. and that. Everything is black. Which is an ominous, ominous shade, it's not
a color technically. But it's a very
ominous shade, you know. It's a neutral, they call it. That's the symbology of death and the
executioner. And that's why it came out then. This other town that I was living in at the
time, after the first escapades that they had with the military gear, they came
out with this black outfit. They would
have three or four of them walking side-by-side chatting and joking along the
streets. And I noticed, I says, now how come no one's looking at this. I'm
staring at it and saying, what on earth is this? It was so different! And then
I saw in the papers, it says, residents might've noticed police walking down
wearing blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. They were getting the public acclimatized
to the nice new smart uniforms.
This is all before the terrorism thing happened
and 9/11 happened, not long before, but it happened before. It was all getting you ready for it. And
ready for the big transformation in society where they'd maybe even expect some
kind of problems amongst the population in society. Everything is worked out in
advance. It didn't happen by chance. It didn't happen by itself. It didn't
happen because they were just bored of seeing light blue uniforms. It was designed that way to be the same as
the US, because they were going the same way.
This idea of special forces inside society,
and that's how you're trained, most folk go along with that without even giving
it much thought at all. They accept anything in their surroundings quite
easily. And they do accept, like many I've noticed in the past or stated in the
past, that most folk literally will not even use their own minds to think about
anything. They do wait until their favorites authorized newscaster comes on to
tell them about it and what to think about it. And if you get an ominous
feeling when you see something like that and your newscaster says nothing about
it, you'll dismiss it from your mind as unimportant. If it was important the
newscasters and authorities would tell you, you see. That's how they,
that's how simple it is for most people to be conditioned into anything.
That was the same time of course that Allan Rock,
who went off to work from the federal government into the United Nations right
afterwards, he, I think it was up at the Attorney General level he put through,
supposedly single-handedly according to the newspapers at the time, an omnibus
bill. It was called an Omnibus crime
bill. Nothing was happening, remember,
in the 90s, especially in Canada. They said that, the reporters, what is this, this is about indefinite
detention without charge and blah blah blah. They said, this is an anti-terror bill or, you
know, a wartime bill. That's exactly
what it was. But the public were never given a reason for it. About three years
later of course 9/11 happens and there you go.
What happens too, for the public's information is
always way behind what's planned to happen, you see. [Alan chuckles.] We are living through agendas, there's no
doubt about it. None
at all. And Maurice Strong’s agenda,
he's only one part of it working with the Rockefeller Brothers for years, and
he brings through the whole idea of Biodiversity Treaty at the Rio Conferences.
None of the public are involved in this.
It's all to do with the top honchos that are in with the United Nations,
the world government and so on. And Maurice Strong also when he came over to
Canada, they brought him back from Canada briefly when Bob Rae was in Ontario,
the premier of Ontario, and he was put in charge of Ontario Hydro Electric Power
for the whole of Ontario. Ontario is a very big place remember. At the same time
he was drawing a salary from the United Nations. Caused a wee bit of a conflict, not much mind
you, because he could to do [Alan chuckles.] lots of things and no one's going to say boo
to him.
Because there's such a thing as, almost a special
kind of select royalty amongst them. And you can see that if you have eyes to
see. But he closed down one of the power plants and
said he wasn't going to reopen it. This is way back then. All to do with what we're seeing now... We've got to start
getting the public to use less energy, less energy. This also includes
water. Electricity, it includes water if
you need electricity to pump it or to supply it to your homes. So, it was all
planned a long time ago and the people just adapt and adapt and adapt. Just
like the ones getting led back from the dreary, dreary occupation you might
say, on that road back to the Gulag. And
that's what the public did, they simply adapt and adapt. It must be okay
because after all, they mean well, you know, our managers mean well, they're
there to serve us. Where do you see any instance, for example, of them
being there to serve you? I mean, if that's the case I want to be one of them,
to get the servants paycheck. Because I really need it badly. In other words,
everything is deception, including the terminology, isn't it? It really is. But that's what you must do.
Today I looked across some of the old books I've
got here because certain things just stick in your mind, sometimes whole
chapters do. But I was thinking of Charles Galton Darwin and his book The Next Million Years. Remember,
Charles Galton Darwin, a descendent of Charles Darwin, he was also a top
physicist. He worked on the atomic energy program to create the atom bomb. And the Manhattan project, he was part of the
team for the Manhattan Project. He coordinated; it wasn't just done all by
those in the US. It was done with scientists from Australia, Canada, Britain
and so on. But he helped to actually work to design the
bomb. After that he dedicated himself to
working on eugenics, the program of eugenics, which his whole family going way
back to Charles Darwin were completely involved in along with the Huxley's.
Thomas Huxley, remember, was a great pal of Darwin and he became "Darwin's
bulldog" and took over the agenda for Darwinism and eugenics when Darwin
died.
Charles Galton Darwin - en.wikipedia.org
I've mentioned in so many talks before that
there's no doubt about it, from the speeches that, say, the brother Julian
Huxley gave, the brother of Aldous Huxley, when he was put in as head of
UNESCO. He talked about the different categories of helpers that manage the
lives of us mere mortals down below. He mentioned the financial class way up
there and those who manage the system of economics. Below that they had the
scientific class, including the mind people, the people who manage your minds,
the behaviorists and psychologists and all that. Very important. They manage
the culture and keep you, you know, down there somewhere in Lala land and
happy. He talked about all different kinds that's necessary, and that existed
then, to manage us all. Including the media and what the media's job was
back then. It was rather blatant, people use to
understand what I'm talking about now.
And here I am going off prattling on about, I didn't even intend to go
this way.
But the fact is, when I was growing up the older
people all distrusted the media. They knew who owned the newspapers. And the magnets. And hhh, they knew
who they were, and they knew the organizations they belonged to. This was
before computers, folks. People, they were not stupid. They knew what
their leanings were, with so-called left, right or whatever it happened to be.
They were much more educated in it all back then than they are today. And they didn't
trust them because they knew what power was all about. They knew what
governance was all about, how they were governed by all of
these special institutions, that Darwin and the Huxley's and all the rest of
them were talking about and were part of in fact.
You see, the deep state is a modern term for what
existed back then. It's always been here. And the first thing
you'll find in the writings of The Next
Million Years, you'll find, you'll go into… Again, they always touch on
histories, as though it was all a known fact and all the rest of it. But it's
to convince you that what he's going to eventually hit you with, is quiet, you
know, reasonable. So how to get people to be reasonable about getting
sterilized... and, you know, giving up good food and stuff and getting sick
again and dying? I mean, how do you get...
It's almost like salesman. Salesman try to get you to say yes. It's a nice day, isn't it? Yeah, yeah.
Beautiful sun. Yeah. Look at the, there are the lovely flowers,
aren't they? Yeah. Nice garden, oh. And away they go. And the
more times they can get you to say yes, eventually when it comes to the sales
pitch for the items they're going to sell, or insurance, you don't want to say
no to this nice person that you said yes to all along. It's simple
stuff. But it works. It really works. We’re
very predictable. Well studied. We are well studied, like you wouldn't believe.
But you'll find as I say, let me, let's just take
something to do with Charles Galton Darwin's book. And again, you'll agree with
most of the stuff because all of the stuff he's
talking about is obvious solutions, you see, he wants your permission to go
along with. But you'll find that he says, he talks about creeds. Now, a creed,
he talks about all, many, how society is structured, etc., very simple, not in
any great depth. But he talks about creeds and things that have had a long-term
effect on cultures. If you got a long time of peace because it's a religious
culture, but what they call a creed, you see, which gives your morals and a
just society, well, just to an extent, you all know the rules, there's less
crime and so on. And you can work together or even help each other, or even
feed each other, hopefully, as nature should really... That's what being human
is about is helping each other. That's how we survived even thousands of years
ago, before commerce came along the way it is today. But they talked about creeds being awfully
successful at that.
And before he goes on to creeds in his book The Next Million Years, he does touch
on the different problems in society. How do you get the public..
how do you get the public to just give everything up and be bossed around by
their betters, the scientific class, you see?
Then he said…
The Next Million Years, Charles Galton Darwin
Thus a creed may have the rudiment of the quality, possessed by the genes of mankind,
(Alan: ...the creed, he's
talking about religion, you see.)
of being able to produce a permanent effect on humanity.
If the history of the future is not regarded as the automatic unfolding of a sequence of uncontrollable events - and few, of us would accept this inevitability - then anyone who has decided what measures are desirable for the permanent betterment of his fellows will naturally have to consider what is the best method of carrying his policy through.
(A: So he's talking about ways
of getting you to depopulate yourselves. Even sterilization of the unfit, etc. That's what he calls it, the unfit, and even
feeble. All the stuff the Nazis were blamed for. And this is after Nazi Germany
by the way. Because they brought
eugenics back and one of the biggest pushers of that of course was cleverly put
through at UNESCO by Julian Huxley.
M-hm. They made it part of the progressive movement,
they call it the progressive movement. So progressive eugenics, you see, by
genetic, regressive genetic alteration. It sounds better than just eugenics
that got a bad name, you see. But
anyway, getting back to Darwin here and Darwin says…)
...desirable for the permanent betterment of his fellows will naturally have to consider what is the best method of carrying his policy through.
There are three levels at which he might work. The first and weakest is by direct conscious political action;
(A: …trying to get politics to
push it through, you see. But don't throw that one out the window, right, he
calls it the weakest. Then he says…)
his policy is likely to die with him and so to be ineffective.
The second is by the creation of a creed, (A: …it’s a religion, right.) since this has the prospect of lasting for quite a number of generations, so that there is some prospect of really changing the world a little with it.
(A: Don’t forget what he said
there, he’s giving you a lot of stuff in a little paragraph here. So…)
The second is by the creation of a creed, since this has the prospect of lasting for quite a number of generations, so that there is some prospect of really changing the world a little with it.
The third would be by directly changing man's nature, working through the laws of biological heredity, and if this could be done for long enough it would be really effective. But even if we knew all about man's genes, which we certainly do not, a policy of this kind would be almost impossible to enforce even for a short time, and, since it would take many generations to carry it through, it would almost certainly be dropped long before any perceptive effects were achieved. That is why creeds (A: …religions…) are so tremendously important for the future;
(A: You see, that’s what your sustainability and greening and vegan and all that, that’s all part of the new creed that they’ve created. [Alan chuckles.] If you’ve not figured that out all ready.)
…a creed gives the best practical hope that a policy will endure well beyond the life of its author, and so it gives the best practical hope that man can have for really controlling his future fate.
So he's tells you, this
is in the 1950s the book came out, 1952 I think it was, what his, this was in
all his own stuff he was talking about. He was in think tanks galore, his own
level, to do with this, what they called the problem of humanity. That it existed
before the war and during the war, and here they are after the war. They
didn't, it never died off. The
eugenic society is alive and well. And you
know, it's actually been awfully successful, isn't it?
Because they've convinced the West, nevermind the
fact that they're going sterile anyway, hm.
Just like you'll find from the writings of their other compatriots of
these characters like the Darwin's, like the Russell's, that all knew each
other and worked together in the same think tanks, etc., of how you sterilize
the public, etc.? Hm? And then how to make it desirable to be
single. Give them lots of sex, take care of any problems... By the state, which
you use tax money to deal with problems. It would be awfully easy
actually. How do you do it? You
create promiscuity, hypersexualize them through their culture industry, etc. It
was all designed.
People think things happen by themselves. The
deep state is real. If the state wanted
you all to live in an Edwardian or even Victorian fashion, you'd go right back
to it very quickly. And they could do it
too. There's nothing they can’t do with you
or convince you of. Because they have their psychology and their understanding
of human nature, and the techniques used to change your behavior, they could do
it very quickly. That's what I'm trying to say to you.
But most folk will never be convinced anyway. Or
don't care. Remember, again, most folk don't care, who belong to the same group,
being that of the bulk of the populace who take the easiest path out of a
problem. And the path is always directed for them, you get a signpost for it,
this is the easy path. They take it. Most people use this path, they take
it. [Alan laughing.] It's like [Alan chuckles.] when you go
searching for anything on the Internet, most
people who look for this also saw, you know… Forget that! I don't even
follow that, I just… All this stuff is turned off on my computers. Forget it. I
know what I'm looking for. You know,
whether I find it, it will be a battle.
But I have more of a chance doing that way, without being distracted
into, by the nudge units as they call themselves, you know, Behavioral Insights
Teams.
So really, we truly are, we truly are living,
it's not even an experiment. It's way beyond all of that. It's so... It's
everything. Everywhere you look. Everything you listen to. It's all through
your entertainment industry. All your updates, what you're supposed to think,
believe, be angry about, be loving about, whatever it is they tell you what is good behavior. And they keep changing you all the time.
And folk go along with it all.
That's what Winston was talking about, the
Winston character in 1984. At the
end Winston literally comes to love
big brother. He comes to love big brother, so much so he would have tears,
genuine tears in his eyes. And when O'Brien told him, and would shock him with
torture, how many fingers have I got up,
he'd say. If O'Brien held up four or
whatever, or five, O'Brien would say, he would shock him and say, I've got
three up, even if he's holding 5 up, right. O'Brien said, with all the shocking,
as he’s screwing with your mind until you’re so, your mind is frazzled, and
they'd rebuild your mind, until towards the end Winston said, I'm trying to see five, you know. And
O'Brien says, that's not good enough, you
must really believe it. And if I say I can fly Winston, you'll believe I can
fly. It wasn't good enough to say
what they wanted you to say, you had to believe
it. Understand? That's where folk are today with it all. There's
many ways of torturing you. You don't have to get physical torture.
Now, let's just touch on this here. But yeah, The Next Million Years, again, I've
done talks before on some of these books and you should go through them in my
website in the archive section. You'll start to learn something, for those who
haven't done it. You'll find that
there's nothing new under the sun, especially with all the agendas that are
right in front of your face today, and being disclosed
as though they're just instituting them today. They're old agendas and they were planned long before you were born. A lot of them were planned in the last
century, and even before that one. [Alan
chuckles.] There you go, hey.
So anyway, I'll put up a link to the postwar era
with Huxley of course. You have to go through it and
read about the Huxley's. Very important family of course. You'll find…
‘Julian Huxley and the Continuity of Eugenics in Twentieth-century
Britain’
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
by Professor Paul Weindling
(A: So, it's not conspiracy
theory at all. He talks about...)
The life and ideas of Julian Sorrell Huxley (1887-1975) represent not only considerable contributions to evolutionary theory but also to eugenic thought and social planning.
(A: So, it’s not conspiracy.)
Huxley’s career history was complex and disjointed making him an international and very much a public figure.
(A: It goes into how, really,
the Huxley's were awfully important, and how they were descended from Thomas
Huxley, Darwin's bulldog. You'll find too they're all intermarried; all these
families are intermarried. Getting back
again, before I go any further actually, it says here…)
…providing an influential analysis of human evolution and a set of persuasively appealing concepts for both the wider public and scientific elite.
(A: They want you to go along
with it, you see. And appealing concept… Well, it's not that bad, is it, you
see. Getting back to Winston, you know, I really want to see it, you know, what
you're telling me, how many fingers are up there. And they really want to see it,
you see. And so, you must be broken, and come
with perfect servitude, as Aldous Huxley mentioned, how the public will
go along into this new agenda, which they're floating right through right now,
with perfect, into perfect servitude, they'll
come to love their servitude. It's all the same agenda. It's almost like coding of the language, just
slightly different here and there, the insiders all know what it means, they
know who's talking and using the same language. You see? But anyway…)
A full-scale critical biography of Huxley has eluded historians, because of the sheer complexity of his activities. Historians of the life sciences have recognised the theoretical originality of his scientific contributions, and his role in developing what he called in 1942 “the evolutionary synthesis”. His popularising of natural history and ornithology in a new guise of ethology showed his visionary ability to define a field of research. His central commitment to “reform eugenics” linked to social planning has been elucidated for the pre-Second World War period. While Huxley’s role in co-authoring the anti-Nazi We Europeans (A: Because he was an author in this one.) has been duly recognised, Huxley’s overlooked support for refugee scientists from National Socialism, not least at London Zoo from 1935-42 can be linked to his evolutionary agendas. A number of historical initiatives open the way for reconsidering Huxley: these include interest in the early years of Unesco and the Unesco declaration on race, elucidation of how Cold War Culture was shaped by intelligence agencies, and historical reconstruction of the place of eugenics in international population policies and practices.
This is not
a conspiracy theory. And it goes on and
on and on. But that's only one of many actually. And
most folk don't care. As I say, most folk are still in that workers group going
back to the camp and there's no guards left. They’re under invisible guards,
like we have today, they’re invisible and you get a little email, you know, or
something like that, or a knock on the door.
You see what I'm saying? It's all here, folks.
I also want to put this one up too.
Why the 'post-natural' age could be strange and beautiful
bbc.com / 3 May 2019
(A: Hm? Isn't that wonderful? Post natural age, as you get conditioned,
hey. It says…)
At 4913 Penn Ave, Pittsburgh, there is an unusual institution. The Center for PostNatural History is a small museum with an eclectic and bizarre mix of specimens: you will find a rib-less mouse embryo, sterile male screwworm, a sample of E. coli x1776 (a specimen designed to be harmless and unable to survive outside the laboratory), and a stuffed transgenic BioSteel goat named Freckles, genetically modified to produce spider silk proteins in her milk.
These are some of the things on show there. But
it's getting you used to post-natural this and post-natural that, post-natural
humans, you see. And that's what you're
going through today with the big changes. You see, they all work together,
though, they all work together.
Hopefully you won't breed at all and then your population will really
plummet very quickly. That's what they also want. But not too fast, at once,
you see, not too fast. They actually have ideal rates
of it, of the decline.
But they also go through different little
documentaries that are out there, you'll probably see them in this museum.
Where they show you, we may even become… Don't forget that Julian Huxley coined
the term trans-human, right, he called himself the trans-humanist all that
time ago in the 1920s and 30s and 40s and 50s. This article here goes into
again, the trans-human thing where you may even get animal genes put into
you down the road, too. For animals
going extinct and you who carry their genes down through generations, maybe
bring them back in the future, from your own…
This is how they're getting you used to this complete change. Change
is the key, the word change. Planned change, hm. And allowing yourself to be changed,
hm. For the good of all, you see. It's a
crisis don't you know.
So, I'll put this article up too and then again,
what was the agenda before World War I and before World War II? Depopulate, too many of the wrong people, too
many of the wrong people. Well, now we've got crisis and climate change,
and, oh there's just not enough energy to… blah blah blah blah blah. So you
know, same agenda. But now it's under necessity,
to save us all, they must bring down the population to save us all. An oxymoron
right off the bat, but that won't compute with most folk.
Plant-based meat startup Beyond Meat prices at $25 a share ahead of IPO
foxbusiness.com / 2 May 2019
The Bill Gates-backed plant-based meat startup Beyond Meat priced at the top end of its IPO range at $25 a share ahead of its debut on the Nasdaq on Thursday, lifting the California based company's potential market value to almost $1.5 billion.
So the same monopolists that run, you know,
information and computers and so on, right, are into all other things too. Now
they're going for your food supply. And
you already had it where the big big companies own seeds, you can’t even save seeds now,
they put the killer gene in them, the Terminator gene so you have to go back
every year and buy seed from them if you want to grow stuff as a farmer.
Are you beginning to get it, what monopoly is all about, folks? Power and
control. So, I'll put this one up. Then
here's another one…
Lab-Grown Meat Coming to Supermarket Shelves Soon?
foxbusiness.com / 1 May 2019
(A: Our governments are funding
these, and they're paying, in losses that they say they've got at the big big supermarkets, hey, they're
paying them to grow it.)
This startup makes lab-grown meat from animal cells.
A Silicon-Valley startup, Memphis Meats says they have successfully made the world’s first lab-grown chicken strips as well as duck and beef using animal cells.
So, this is a different one. Again, they've actually
done artificial stuff that they tried creating in laboratories, I think
it was in Holland initially. I think
there's quite a few countries involved in making this particular
artificial meat. Quite a few
countries involved. Holland is one. The US is one. Israel is another one. I
don't know if Britain is doing it yet. But so many countries will be involved
in all of this stuff.
But they want us all to eat, especially substitutes, meat substitutes.
But now they've got artificial meat as well because they don't want you having
beef around, you know, people are living too long, they claim. M-hm.
Here's one here too…
No more bacon sarnies? Ed Miliband…
(A: ...of Britain, right, Ed
Miliband, a politician actually who comes from the
family of some say communists, but definitely socialists. His brother who was another
politician went off from Britain and he's now the, or he was put in charge at
the time, he‘s still with them, a big, big charity for the philanthropic salary
of half a million a year I think it was. They're awfully well-paid, these particular socialists. But it says…)
No more bacon sarnies? Ed Miliband says we will have to 'eat less meat' (A: …This is the one who’s still in Britain…) and backs more taxes (A: …naturally…) on holiday flights to tackle climate change in a fiery BBC interview with John Humphrys - dailymail.co.uk / 30 Apr 2019
(A: There you go. So, I'm sure
he will do without, right? Hm? M-hm.)
So, it says he's a former Energy and Climate Change Minister. What a title to have, energy and climate
change minister. He's in charge of the climate, 'eh, or he was. They used to
have these titles for the gods of Egypt, they had gods for all things, including
the climate, you know, the sun, and air.
And, yeah, rain too. We just elect them. Or you think you do. So, there
you go. And it all comes out of our taxes too, which also impoverish you, until,
you know, they're getting the message, less energy, less energy, less energy.
Technically money is a form of energy. There was an organization out in the 30s
came out with that, and they actually planned it that way, energy units. And some of the top bankers today still talk
about it.
White Castle - plant-based sliders
foxbusiness.com / 11 Apr 2018
It looks like meat and even tastes like it, but it’s not made from cows.
(A: Isn't that statement right
out of Orwell's 1984 when they're in
the canteen and Orwell's neighbor who works there too at the same place says,
to this kind of white mush that they're eating, he says, isn't it amazing, he says, looks like meat, tastes like meat, but
there's no meat in it at all. And here you're reading it from articles
they're putting out, looks like meat, it
says, and even tastes like it, but it's
not made from cows.)
Impossible Foods CEO Patrick Brown explains the process behind creating the company’s plant-based protein, and how hamburger restaurants around the country are taking bite out of it.
So there you go. It's like the old soya stuff
from the 60s and 70s, that quivering jelly stuff you used to see. I've got a
few articles and I'll put all these links up anyway for you, for people who are
interested in catching up on it.
Maggot sausage and a scoop of insect ice-cream: Scientists claim alternative protein made from BUGS 'needs to be incorporated' to meals - dailymail.co.uk / 1 May 2019
But anyway, as I say, they want to bring down,
you know, the population, to eat less meat, to tackle climate change, remember,
the big crisis. You see, it's a wartime crisis, you're the enemy to the planet
as mankind, you see, so they got to deal with that problem. And you must go
along with it, but they want your consent to go along with it. And at the same
time all this is happening, right, you've got euthanasia, big time euthanasia.
I can remember, I think it was the night of 2001 when I was on a show, of the
11th of course, 9/11 2001, saying, the hardest thing… Because I knew the whole
agenda would be unleashed with this whole thing. Because two Bushes by that time had given us
the big talks on a new world order,
and if you're in-the-know and you'd studied enough from the same sources at the
top, you know what they were talking about, the unleashing of a whole new
agenda, to the public anyway but an old
agenda to them, for this order of living, depopulation, a world system all run
by the same group at the top.
Again, you've got the whole Agenda 21 to
work through for the 21st century where all of this must be accomplished step
by step by step. Out of the cars, a temporary solution given you, so you
won't complain too much, which won't be around for too long. Getting you off of meat. Getting you used to the fact that
you can't afford the energy anymore, especially electricity and so on.
Things that have made it more comfortable and more sanitary and keeping disease
down and all the rest of it, all the things you need are gradually being taken
down, for most of the public. Easy to do when you mandate it this way. And then you tax penalties, so only those at
the very top and wealthy people can afford to live like they had lived before.
Quite simple, isn't it.
But you also get the next part of it too, that
even Obama prattled on about, more openly about, his grandmother being sick,
etc. And why openly talk about that in a
public speech? Well, he's talking about euthanasia. Because the old agenda, which again, goes way
back, waay back, and again came out in the 1930s with
Brave New World, where you'd live a
healthy life until a certain age and then you'd get sick and then you die. And they would teach the children to
celebrate death. And the bodies would go
back into the earth. Like they're doing
now, again, like the articles last week with the green goo, they turn you into
green goo and they can poor you into the roots of a tree, you know. Starting to
get it, are you?
It's a very old agenda. But you see, you must get
the public to go along with that. And as Aldous Huxley said, you know, they'll come to love their servitude.
He was warning you too. He says, perhaps they could make the public with
techniques, he's talking about psychology and behaviorism and all these
techniques of manipulating your minds and your beliefs or whatever. He said, perhaps they can convince the public to
accept things that the public possibly they should not accept
for their own good. That was on the television show with Mike Wallace
when he said that. He gave you little warnings.
Unlike his brother who just dictated to you. His
brother, by the way, Julian Huxley, had to go and get electroshock therapy and
various other things. He was manic. And he'd go into depressive phases
too. They call it bipolar today. It ran
in their family, through certain inbreeding too, tendencies, depression, and
going way back actually. It runs in their family. And don't forget these
families are all intermarried, the Darwin's, the Huxley's. The Darwin's were
interbred with the Wedgwood family for generations, the two families interbred
completely. So, they're already into the
specialized breeding programs for those who haven't figured anything out
yet. [Alan chuckles.],
And I'm not, this is no conspiracy, this is his
historical fact. So, let's go into the
next part too and it talks about...
More than a quarter of the deaths in Holland are “induced,” report
finds
aleteia.org / 22 Jan 2019
(A: Meaning, euthanasia, a quarter
of them now. I followed that and gave
talks over many years on Holland. Because Holland, by its own admission, and
its own studies of the population, are the most passive compliant population in
Europe. They're the least ones, the least people in Europe to demand anything
from their government or go against the government policies. They're very
compliant. That's why they picked Holland to start it with years ago. So more
than a quarter of the deaths in Holland are induced, right.)
Euthanasia in the Netherlands is on the rise.
Fifteen years after the Netherlands decriminalized euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, more than 25 percent of all deaths in the nation are induced, rather than by illness or other natural causes.
(A: You understand that?!)
…rather than by...
(A: They're dying...)
…rather…
...more than 25 percent of all deaths in the nation are induced, rather than by illness or other natural causes.
That figure is based on statistics from 2017 and includes almost 6,600 cases of euthanasia; 1,900 suicides and some 32,000 people killed through a practice called palliative sedation, according to an article in the Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/jan/18/death-on-demand-has-euthanasia-gone-too-far-netherlands-assisted-dying
(A: It's got the link on that
article too. I'll put these links up tonight for those who want.)
In the article, journalist Christopher de Bellaigue traces the history of euthanasia in the Netherlands from when it was introduced for extreme cases (A: They always start off with extreme cases…) (“unbearable suffering with no prospect of improvement”) to the point where some are advocating for a legal pill that practically anyone can take in case they are tired of living.
They're already giving it to ones who are just
depressed, you see. So, they want to get
rid of the gene pools of those who have any of these problems happening to
them. Now, how many youngsters go through
depression bouts? I mean, everybody does at some point or another, I think, as
you’re finding out who you are, what life's about, and you're not even sure
yet. [Alan chuckles.] And a lot of folks when they're adults don't know what
life's all about yet, because it's so deceptive.
But that's Holland. Now, Canada, again, and many
other countries have followed suit with this. Here's an article here to do with
that too. It's quite amazing, really. This is from Life Site News.
Euthanasia doctor hired for prime role at Ottawa Catholic palliative
care hospital
lifesitenews.com / 1 May 2019
(A: So, the Catholic palliative
care hospital hired a euthanasia doctor...)
A doctor who performs “assisted deaths” (A: …they like to call it…) and lobbied for legal euthanasia in Canada now has a pivotal role at a Catholic hospital in Ottawa renowned for its palliative care.
Dr. James Downar was hired in October as head of palliative care at the University of Ottawa, a tripartite position in which he splits his clinical time between the intensive care unit at Ottawa General Hospital and the palliative care ward at the Catholic Elisabeth Bruyère Hospital.
Downar is also a researcher with the Bruyère Research Institute.
Dr. Jose Pereira, a staunch opponent of euthanasia, formerly held the position.
News of Downar’s appointment comes as LifeSiteNews learned that Canada’s Catholic health sponsors approved secret national guidelines in consultation with the bishops to allow third-party euthanasia assessments for medically frail patients onsite at Catholic health care facilities — including Bruyère.
Catholic moral theologian Dr. E. Christian Brugger says allowing such assessments at Catholic institutions is “morally wrong cooperation” because it is “scandalous and a gross failure to bear witness to the Gospel.”
(A: Well, they better make their
minds up what they're serving, hey. They've already had complaints from social
media about it and people who are really ticked off at it. But it says...)
Downar’s euthanasia advocacy is a matter of public record.
As the former chair and member of the Physician Advisory Committee for Dying with Dignity Canada, he lobbied for the legalization of euthanasia in Canada.
He performs assisted deaths, supports the harvesting of organs of euthanized individuals, (A: Interesting too, he's in the organizations to harvest organs, 'eh.) was a paid consultant on the Canadian Medical Association course (A: They call it MAID...) on “Medical Aid in Dying,” (A: They call it MAID of course, because it's your maid, you'll be calling for a maid when you need help, right, so MAID is just to kill you. Pleasant in a way, isn't it?) and advocates that euthanasia be part of palliative care.
(A: Eventually, you see,
palliative care will simply BE euthanasia. You see? Instead of taking care as
best as you can until a person dies naturally, they're going to simply bump you
off quickly. They want palliative care to become medical assisted death, you
see. They already offer you a quick exit in the Canadian hospitals. I've
already done stories on that where they offer to young people who are not
dying, ha, ha. But they're actually offering it to some people.)
(A: And it's a downhill thing
from here because believe you me, these characters are out in society. They're not giving this because they believe
it's helping society. You've got to understand the types of characters who run
in positions and who are appointed to positions of authority over the general
population. You've got to see... there are plenty of psychopaths all through
society. Plenty of them. All through society. You find them in surgery at
times, with surgeons and things like that.
If you were to hear what they talk about it might shock you. But your
government’s promoting this, remember. So, this one goes on and on and on. It
says…)
Ottawa’s Archbishop Terrence Prendergast told the Catholic Register he believes that Downar’s appointment will not threaten Bruyère’s Catholic character.
(A: …the hospital's Catholic
character. Oh, I think it would,
wouldn't you? Anyway he…)
… was a paid consultant on the Canadian Medical Association course on “Medical Aid in Dying”…
(A: That's the dying course,
remember, and…)
As the former chair and member of the Physician Advisory Committee for Dying with Dignity Canada,
(A: And also big Pharma... Boehringer Ingelheim, Canada, Medtronics, and Novartis. So, big Pharma. So that's what this guy is a member of, and probably other organizations no doubt too. It's the way these guys are.)
So, there you go, it's on your face, really. There's
nothing to guess at. Plus, he promotes harvesting organs. M-hm.
I keep telling folk, we are the
business. We are good business, aren't we?
And most folk don't even know they're a business, until even when they’re
dead they don't know they're a business.
We are THE business on the planet. We provide the
tax money for everything, don't we. We provide the kind of money that gives a
lot of characters big massive salaries.
And we pay for, and we create organizations that allow, sometimes, these
characters to rule over us and do what they want to do. And bring in the big
agenda, m-hm. I'll put this one up for
anybody who cares about it. It even has lists of hospitals in the US and Canada
that, the US for sure that tell you where you can go and get this done. [Alan laughing.] Yep.
Death by organ donation: Euthanizing patients for their organs gains frightening traction - usatoday.com / 2 May 2019
So, it's quite something we live in. And again,
eugenics, getting back to it, don't forget what I started the talk with. It's quite important, is meant to realize
what you're living through. Yep. And we are. We're living through it. It's all
the same agenda, euthanasia, isn't it, hm.
Linked in completely, absolutely linked in is euthanasia
with population control, eugenics, economic system. Because
you see, we've not to be a burden on society. If we're paying money into the
system, according to the United Nations a
good global citizen is a good producer and
consumer. That's how they define
it from their own writings and charters. So obviously if you're not producing anymore,
you're consuming, then you're just a burden on society. Well, here's a pill,
it's only 25 cents for goodness’ sake, and that will save the system a lot of
the money that you've paid into it that we can use for other things. And they
can maybe harvest your organs in the process and make up a little bit of money
on the side. We're awfully good, aren't we? We really are good, you know.
I wonder if they'll give us little incentives
down the road, with the article last week where they're going to turn us into
green goo, rather than cremate us, and pour us into mother Earth here to grow
plants and stuff. Will we get some money
before we are dead maybe? We could put our names forward and then they can say
okay, if you turn me into green goo to feed the trees and the plants and that,
can I get some cash before I die, hm?
Hey? Or are they really going to push
this for the good will of us, to give it all for nothing? Because we give
everything else for nothing, don't we, hm?
It's strange what all the folk can make money off, that you leave
behind, like organs and stuff like that. It's just astonishing that they live
an awfully good lifestyle, hm, out of all these nothings, that just happened to
be you. Ha! [Alan chuckles.]
And now our overseers too, as was predesigned of
course, Macron and Zuckerberg meet in France... talking about Facebook, meaning
the other ones too. And the whole system is meant to tackle hate speech,
meaning anything that's politically incorrect is going to be called
hate, naturally.
Zuckerberg meets President Macron as France demands Facebook does more to tackle hate speech - days after co-founder says the social media giant should be broken up (A: You see.) - dailymail.co.uk / 10 May 2019
And again, all these big institutions that you
think, oh, all just suddenly appeared out of nothing by just geniuses that
hatched out. Well, good luck in
understanding anything at all if you believe that. It's all part of the system. And then another article too…
How the trade war with China could hit you - usatoday.com / 10 May 2019
... because I think it's going to cost you up to
25% taxes on things coming in from China. It's great now that you can't make anything here, 'eh? But they're giving a list of things that are
going to be taxed, to start with, right.
And of course, all the ones, the wholesalers have already said they'll
pass the taxes on to the consumer.
That's all of you. You paid for
all your factories and that, and all these companies that actually made real
tangible goods, you paid for it all to go to China through deals made by your
politicians, that you're not invited in on, except to pay for it all. And now you've got to pay taxes on all the
imports from China. Because they're pretending they've got a tiff going with China.
A quick guide to the US-China trade war - bbc.com / 10 May 2019
And once taxes are in of course they always last,
'eh. Because they always use, like your ‘temporary
war tax’ is now your ‘income tax’, isn't it. Temporary war tax, victory tax and
all that.
Again, with Brave
New World you had Soma, and I mentioned about the legalization of different
drugs, 'eh. And you've got legalization
now of even, in some of the states in the US, you've got... I think it's Denver
actually...
Denver becomes first US city to decriminalize 'magic mushrooms' - theguardian.com / 8 May 2019
So, magic mushrooms are going to be okay. And
when they say it's going to be okay… Folk
always harvested their own. Now of course you have professional corporations
that will be in charge of growing it all and making
money off it. Because it's always big corporations
take everything over, if not even start it and launch it in the first place.
And it's only the start because they'll go on and on with other drugs too.
That's what some of the top honchos have said.
Because it's now Soma time, now that much of your
meaning of life seems crazy... the pace of life is getting crazy… the reasons
for being around seem crazy, hence euthanasia, etc. No kidding you, this is all tied in, it's all
worked out this way. So I'll put these articles up anyway on the drugs and how
they're pushing, how they're pushing through, again, the so-called, the top
media – you're not allowed to say certain words
now – with the top media, authorized, are pushing it all, because their
job is to push a lot of things, that confuse you. But you've got…
Is microdosing LSD a solution to the 'crisis
of meaning' in modern life?
montrealgazette.com / 24 Apr 2019
(A: It's... oh, there ya
go. See.
So, let's bring LSD in micro-doses, 'eh.)
No visions, no wavering lights, no breathing wood. It’s less about being at one with all forms of life (A: ...making you one with them…) and more about just getting through the day.
(A: So, it's good for you. It’s
therapeutic now, right. Rather than just
jump out the window and things like that, I knew folk who did that, it's going
to help you, you see. You understand how
they can make you believe anything?
'Eh?!)
It was one of the largest formal studies of its kind. The participants — 909 of them, recruited online from 29 countries — included teachers and people who worked in advertising, and ranged in age from their late teens to their late 70s. By gathering responses to an online questionnaire and challenging them to a task to measure their creativity, two University of Toronto PhD students completed one of the first psychological profiles of the growing microdosing community.
“Microdosing” is the regular consumption of small, non-trippy amounts of psychedelic substances such as LSD and “magic mushrooms.”
(A: Isn't that amazing, you got all these articles all flooding in at the same time from different, what seems to be different sources, hm.)
The study found the microdosers scored lower overall on neuroticism and “dysfunctional” attitudes,
(A: Meaning, you're very...
you're not going to be... you're going to be more pleasant. You know, can we tax you more? Oh, no
problem, sure, okay, go ahead, yep. So,
you'll be more pleasant and stuff and less neurotic. You won't say, well you can’t tax me anymore,
I'm starving as it is, for God’s sake, you know. Nope, you can't say that. They just want you to take a little trip of
LSD, you'll say, oh, sure, man, you know, cool man, yeah yeah, good cause, yeah
sure. And...)
and higher on a brief “wisdom” scale
(A: You'll be more
wise. You see how they push that rubbish forever? You ever seen the
rubbish that folk write after they've been tripping out? or even smoking dope
'eh? At the time they've got great philosophy and great poetry. Then they
realize, what the heck…??? And of course they, you know, they try to burn them
before anybody sees them, you know, these are rubbish, hm. But here they are telling the same old con
game here, higher on a brief wisdom scale...)
that measures beliefs like, “I am in touch with my feelings,” or, “I have a good sense of humour about myself.” They seemed more open-minded, more curious and more creative, coming up with more unique and unusual uses for a brick, and a knife. (A: Huh?) In other words, their mental health seemed to be flourishing.
(A: I guess that's well-being, 'eh, I guess. Hm. Isn't that wonderful. In other words, the system, the big system will like you more when you're just, way out man, sure. You know, laid-back. It says…)
. . . compared microdosers (current and former) against controls (no microdosing experience whatsoever), their study lacked a placebo arm, making it hard to prove cause and effect.
“This isn’t the 'tune in, drop out' counterculture of the '60s
(A: No, no, no, it's to be pleasant. You see, you'll be awfully pleasant to everything that you're told. Can we take your shoes, we need them? Oh no problem man, you know, sure, yeah, yeah.)
. . . University of Toronto Centre for Psychedelic Studies — (A: Like they haven’t done enough of them, ‘eh? And no doubt will be getting little grants for this too.) are preparing what could be the first Canadian study of its kind, a new randomized trial that will compare placebos to measured doses of psilocybin (A: …that’s the mushroom.), the principal psychoactive compound found in certain types of fresh and dried mushrooms. (A: Can you believe we're wasting our money like this?)
But again, this agenda, you gotta get drugged,
folks. Because society is getting so crazy. And you know what it is? As they
take all your beliefs from you… when you see things that just don't make sense,
you actually physically see things, and you’re
told to believe other things...
And then you can't... Well, you've got to get drugs, you'll start to see
lots of weird things. I'm telling you, like the jolly green giant. There was a
guy who did that, hey. He was tripping out on a hillside and he literally
claimed there was a guy hundreds of feet tall, completely green, went hopping
along over the hills and over him. Yep. No kidding you. Yeah.
So, you're going to feel laid-back for goodness’ sake. And yeah, it will also do away, with some of
these drugs, some of these drugs do away with appetite. Whereas dope of course
tends to make folk eat more. M-hm.
Another one, even the Guardian is in on the act.
I mean, these papers, it ain’t coincidence.
'It makes me enjoy playing with the kids': is microdosing
mushrooms going mainstream?
theguardian.com / 3 May 2019
...increasing numbers are taking tiny doses of psychedelic drugs in the UK. Why?
(A: Suddenly, a sudden
phenomenon, 'eh, all over the place at the same time. Well, isn't that amazing,
folks, 'eh.)
Inside is a grey powder; her finely ground homegrown magic mushrooms.
(A: There you go.)
“I’ll take a very small dose, every three or four days,” she says...
Understand what's going on, folks? You know, hm? Do you? The things you've already been taught
to accept are getting more bizarre. The things that they want you to accept,
and have you comply with things as you go into poverty, fuel poverty, energy
poverty and all the rest of it, are going to get more bizarre. But it's much easier when you're pleasant and
compliant, isn't it? Yeah, man, no problem.
You know, peace. Yep. And...
'I felt alive': University lecturer, 40, who 'micro-dosed' tiny amounts
of psychedelic mushrooms says drugs encouraged her to split with husband
dailymail.co.uk / 4 May 2019
(A: Well, I wonder if she's on
Oprah yet, you know.)
Lindsay Jordan, 40, university lecturer from east London, says it 'freed' her
Yeah, drugs can free you. Yep. Certainly can.
Wow. Wow, I'm telling you.
And then you go into of course the other side of
things, like Shanghai where they're actually, the addiction to things are so
bad now with drugs they're doing brain surgery on people now and even putting
electrodes in, the old Tavistock idea of electrodes right into the skull, and
you can actually work them with your computer or tablet, probably with your
cell phone too.
Experimental surgery gains support as opioid deaths rise - apnews.com / 9 May 2019
Yep. So that's how you deal with the madness in
society that's been forced upon people. And you get through it all, you see,
you won't notice a thing. You'll just... In fact, you literally probably won't
notice a thing, anything. And...
The mums who took cocaine during play dates
bbc.com / 8 May 2019
(A: Isn't that… All these happy
stories suddenly came out. You think
they all came out by themselves, 'eh?)
Cocaine use in England and Wales is at a 10-year high, with middle-class users accused of fuelling the drugs trade.
(A: They'd be unmarried single
mums and they'd have their babies in the carrier and they go up and do a line
here with their pals and stuff and sit and chat. And then when they're pregnant they also kept
doing it and yada, yada, ya, you know. M-hm.)
One of the UK's leading providers of private addiction treatment says it has seen a 128% increase in the number of cocaine addicts since 2015.
Drugs are great for you, 'eh? Wow.
And here they are pushing more, I'm telling you, at the same time, telling you
at the same time what happens, 'eh.
Quite amazing.
And again, getting back to, you know, euthanasia,
all these people that want to help you, you know, and reduce the population, and get organs at the same time.
Death by organ donation: Euthanizing patients for their organs gains
frightening traction
Palliative
usatoday.com / 2 May 2019
Organ donation is a selfless gift to those on transplant wait lists. But what if we euthanize patients by harvesting their organs?
So, they kill you when they harvest the organs. How's that? Because then they're really fresh, 'eh.
I'm telling you. There you are.
But it's such a nice article... it's just wonderful. It's just… You'll actually want to go and do it after you read this
article. If you take some of the drugs
in fact, you might, you might definitely volunteer for
it. No problem man, you know.
So, getting back to what I said at the beginning.
What I said was, Charles Galton Darwin, descendent of Charles Darwin, and a
physicist who had no problem working on something that would kill millions of
people, the atomic bomb. He wasn't satisfied with that. He wanted to kill an
awful lot more people and euthanize the rest, or else sterilize them at least.
He mentions that in his book The Next
Million Years, if we could just
convince folk to be sterilized for goodness sake, you know, all the wrong people. You know, get them to go along with it, see
their point of view. Again, you know, like Aldous Huxley said, maybe people can
be coerced into coming into agreement with all these things,
and be quite willing to be servants basically of the world State. You'd
be happy with your servitude, you see.
There's nothing that can't be done to you. And
again, Huxley talked about different drugs that could be used. And so did
Charles Galton Darwin. And here ya go,
folks, hm. Here ya go.
And then the enemies of their agenda, the enemies
being too much good energy for giving you sanitary conditions and heat and
warmth in the winter and things like that, start doing away with all of that,
making it unaffordable by most, you get diseases creeping in, and water will
get contaminated again... Well, Bertrand
Russell said, if they only had a black
plague every generation or two, it will keep the population down. Hmm.
Now, I'm not making this stuff up, folks. This is
not conspiracy stuff. It's in-your-face.
And again, I can't make, I said this in my early
talks too, I said, you can't force people to do anything about anything. You could actually do
it if you had the money, lots of
money and use the techniques of persuasiveness, and especially get the young
kids. Brainwash them quickly and make
them hate whatever you want them to hate.
And they become their great army, the
creed, the very creed that
Charles Galton Darwin said would be very effective. It's a creed, it's a belief,
it's a religion. They're
fanatics, these young, they're absolutely fanat... They're like any fanatical type religion, and
they'll do what they're told.
Ruthlessly. It's all there. It doesn't happen by itself. And what the deep state doesn't want doesn't
exist.
So, I'm sorry for prattling on so much in this
talk here. But as I say, I wasn't
prepared for it really. I was just going to mention Charles Galton Darwin and
leave it at that and go into two or three things. But you can always tie things in. You won't get articles in the newspapers or on
television or whatever coming out, all the same articles at the same time
promoting the same things. When we've lived through years and years of drug problems everywhere and suddenly
they're promoting it all. Wake up folks,
'eh. Either wake up, or as they used to
say, or dropout, hm.
Well that's it for me tonight, Alan Watt from
Ontario, Canada, it's good night and may your God or your gods go with
you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
‘Julian Huxley and the Continuity of Eugenics in Twentieth-century
Britain’
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Why the 'post-natural' age could be strange and beautiful
bbc.com / 3 May 2019
Plant-based meat startup Beyond Meat prices at $25 a share ahead of IPO
foxbusiness.com / 2 May 2019
Lab-Grown Meat Coming to Supermarket Shelves Soon?
foxbusiness.com / 1 May 2019
Maggot sausage and a scoop of insect ice-cream: Scientists claim
alternative protein made from BUGS 'needs to be incorporated' to meals
dailymail.co.uk / 1 May 2019
Miliband - we will have to 'eat less meat'
dailymail.co.uk / 30 Apr 2019
White Castle - plant-based sliders
foxbusiness.com / 11 Apr 2018
Charles Galton Darwin
en.wikipedia.org
Euthanasia doctor hired for prime role at Ottawa Catholic palliative
care hospital
lifesitenews.com / 1 May 2019
Death by organ donation: Euthanizing patients for their organs gains
frightening traction
palliative
usatoday.com / 2 May 2019
More than a quarter of the deaths in Holland are “induced,” report
finds
aleteia.org / 22 Jan 2019
Zuckerberg, Macron to tackle hate speech
dailymail.co.uk / 10 May 2019
How the trade war with China could hit you
usatoday.com / 10 May 2019
A quick guide to the US-China trade war
bbc.com / 10 May 2019
Denver becomes first US city to decriminalize 'magic mushrooms'
theguardian.com / 8 May 2019
'It makes me enjoy playing with the kids': is microdosing
mushrooms going mainstream?
theguardian.com / 3 May 2019
'I felt alive': University lecturer, 40, who 'micro-dosed' tiny amounts
of psychedelic mushrooms says drugs encouraged her to split with husband
dailymail.co.uk / 4 May 2019
Is microdosing LSD a solution to the 'crisis
of meaning' in modern life?
montrealgazette.com / 24 Apr 2019
The mums who took cocaine during play dates
bbc.com / 8 May 2019
Experimental surgery gains support as opioid deaths rise
apnews.com / 9 May 2019
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering
Information: |
|||
"Cutting Through" |
& |
"Waiting for the Miracle....." |
|
Ancient Religions and History MP3
CDs: |
& |
Blurbs and
'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc) |
|
"Reality
Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom,
Esoterica and ...TIME" |